THEY ARE SCARED OF THIS…
Credibility score: 46/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "THEY ARE SCARED OF THIS…" and rated it 46/100 for credibility (a BS score of 54/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-10. Its weakest claim — "Says Talarico's blood is literally soy milk" — scored 5/100 and was flagged as bs. 35 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 35 claims analyzed: 5 scored under 40, 29 between 40 and 69, and 1 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Names Miller, Cruz, Waters, Jennings as biggest MAGA cucks attacking Dem masculinity — Opinion (50/100)
At 0:00
Calling four specific pundits the 'biggest cucks' for questioning Dem masculinity — pure partisan heat, not a measurable claim.
Why this score: Pure opinion framing.
- Speaker assigns 'cuck' label to four named figures based on their social media criticism of Democratic masculinity
- No data, study, or metric offered to rank who qualifies as 'biggest'
- Functions as rhetorical attack rather than verifiable statement
Original quote: “There is a key group of MAGA supporters, MAGA pundits and MAGA politicians who are trying to distort reality so much so that they attack an entire cohort of the country. I am talking about the MAGA cucks. The biggest MAGA cucks of all. Steven Miller, Ted Cruz, we have people like Jesse Waters, even…”
Says Talarico's blood is literally soy milk — BS (5/100)
At 0:30
Metaphorical attack on veganism, not a medical claim. Still nonsense.
Why this score: Pure insult, zero literal meaning.
- No blood test results cited
- Soy milk joke is tired culture-war shorthand
- Doesn't even try to be factual
Original quote: “when Terico goes in for a blood test, when he gets a physical, blood doesn't come out. Instead, soy milk comes out”
Republicans are hypocritically making AI videos of James Talarico in a dress — Opinion (50/100)
At 2:30
Calling out the flip on drag content — same party that bans it in schools now doing it for clicks.
Why this score: Classic hypocrisy call.
- Speaker correctly notes the party that pushed anti-drag laws is now generating the exact imagery it claims to hate.
- *No factual dispute here* — it's a consistency argument, not a data claim.
Original quote: “They're trying, number one, it's funny seeing the Republican party try to place men in women's dresses. They're the ones usually complaining about that, but they do the same thing with Calico.”
Republicans are using AI to manufacture fake evidence for their lies — Opinion (50/100)
At 2:41
The 'AI = instant deepfake factory' line is doing heavy lifting — no specific examples shown yet.
Why this score: Broad claim, zero receipts in this segment.
- Speaker asserts AI is now the main tool for election lies and BLM footage.
- *No specific videos, timestamps, or accounts named* — stays in the realm of opinion.
Original quote: “AI ads need to be banned. Number three, AI is the best thing to ever happen to the Republican party because now they can just create the misinformation to substantiate the misinformation.”
Trump and others now use AI to fake footage of cities burning and election fraud — Dubious (45/100)
At 3:06
Minneapolis 2020 damage was real and documented — the 'entire city burning' was the exaggeration, not the event itself.
Why this score: Partial truth, stretched framing.
- Minneapolis *did* see widespread arson and $500M+ in damage per insurance data.
- Speaker correctly notes the 'whole city on fire' line was false, but conflates that with claiming *no* fires happened.
- No evidence presented that AI-generated footage was the main vector for 2020 claims.
Original quote: “When Donald Trump spreads election fraud lies, he can just create the disinformation now with AI. When they used to say that Minneapolis was burning down during BLM, like they used to say the entire city was burning down. That wasn't true. But now they can just manufacture that.”
Trump never protected or provided for anyone but himself — Opinion (50/100)
At 3:30
Borrowed Scott Galloway line — clean soundbite, but 'never protected anyone' is doing a lot of work.
Why this score: Subjective judgment dressed as fact.
- The 'protect and provide' definition comes from Scott Galloway on a 2024 Harris call.
- Speaker applies it exclusively to Trump while ignoring policy outcomes (tax cuts, judges, Abraham Accords) that supporters count as 'providing.'
- Pure value judgment — can't be verified or falsified.
Original quote: “Real men protect and real men provide. Donald Trump has never protected anyone other than himself. He's never provided for anyone other than himself. And that's why I'm voting”
Jesse Waters says voting for a woman president is gay — Dubious (40/100)
At 4:56
Sounds like a paraphrase — no actual Waters clip or quote provided to back it up.
Why this score: Attribution without source.
- Speaker claims Waters made this statement on his show
- No timestamp, episode, or direct quote referenced
- Could be exaggeration or loose interpretation of 'rules for men'
Original quote: “according to him, it is gay to vote for a woman for president. It is gay to drink a milkshake with a straw.”
Jesse Waters left his wife for his assistant — Unverifiable (50/100)
At 5:18
Personal attack presented as fact — zero evidence or reporting cited in the segment.
Why this score: Serious allegation with no backing.
- Speaker states this as established fact about Waters
- No divorce records, news articles, or public statements referenced
- Web context contains no confirmation of this claim
Original quote: “You know what's not masculine, Jesse Waters, is leaving your wife for your assistant. Okay, that's not masculine.”
Paxton, Cruz, Vance failed to protect women or kids — Opinion (50/100)
At 5:30
Three separate moral judgments — each would need its own evidence trail.
Why this score: Opinion framed as moral failure.
- Paxton claim references unspecified legal actions
- Cruz and Vance accused of not 'defending honor' — vague standard
- No court records or statements shown to support the characterizations
Original quote: “Ken Paxton helping to protect child sex predators in Texas. Ted Cruz not defending his wife's honor. JD Vance not defending his wife's honor when she was attacked by Nick Fuentes.”
JD Vance wears more eyeliner than RuPaul's Drag Race contestants — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 5:52
Comedic hyperbole — not meant as a literal makeup count.
Why this score: Rhetorical exaggeration for effect.
- Speaker uses 'more eyeliner than RuPaul's Drag Race' as punchline
- No actual comparison data or photos presented
- Clearly satirical, not a factual claim
Original quote: “JD Vance is out there basically looks maxing. He's following the clavvicular strategy of like trying to change his entire look and he's got more eyeliner on than like anybody on RuPaul's Drag Race.”
US economy is a mess in 2026 — Opinion (50/100)
At 6:05
'Mess' is subjective — depends which indicators you pick.
Why this score: Value judgment on economic conditions.
- Speaker asserts negative state without citing metrics
- No unemployment, GDP, inflation, or wage data referenced
- Economic health is contested and multi-dimensional
Original quote: “They can't run on the economy because it's a mess.”
Trump repeatedly claims deal is two days away while bombing continues — Opinion (50/100)
At 6:30
Calling it daily idiocy is his read — no new evidence presented here.
Why this score: Pure opinion on Trump's messaging. No specific dates or quotes checked. - Transcript gives the pattern but zero sourcing for how often the claim was made.
Original quote: “And he's got and frankly, he looks like an idiot every single day that he's like, "We're two days away from a deal." And then they're bombing the [__] out of each other again.”
Republicans attacking James Talarico over Latina girlfriend as sign of weakness — Opinion (50/100)
At 6:42
His interpretation of motive — whether oppo research happened isn't verified here.
Why this score: Opinion on campaign tactics. - No evidence shown that the attacks were limited to the girlfriend angle. - Community comments praise Talarico but don't confirm the specific oppo claim.
Original quote: “they're attacking Taller Rico for having a an attractive Latina girlfriend and like dumping oppo on her is just so bizarre to me because they have nothing.”
Both parties damaged young men but Republicans hurt them economically — Opinion (50/100)
At 6:55
Broad economic diagnosis — sounds plausible but no numbers or studies cited.
Why this score: Opinion on voter priorities. - No polling data or economic stats provided in segment. - Web context silent on specific 2026 young male economic indicators here.
Original quote: “And yes, I know the Democratic party has a problem with men, but the Republican party better check their numbers because young men in particular, they want jobs. They want opportunity. They want to be able to buy a house.”
Young male Democrat friend flipped to liking party after seeing relatable figures like Zoran Mani — Personal Story (50/100)
At 7:10
Anecdote about one friend — valid as personal experience, not data.
Why this score: Anecdote. - Single friend's shift presented as evidence of broader trend. - No polling to confirm inversion among young men. - Speaker frames it as representative but it's one data point.
Original quote: “Meanwhile, the Republican party was trying to court all these podcast bros. Now everything is inversed where that same Democratic friend is really really into the party. He really likes Zoran Mani. He watches this show.”
Republicans economically screwed young voters then broke promises — Opinion (50/100)
At 8:30
Classic partisan framing — calls broken promises but skips which specific promises and what the economic data actually shows.
Why this score: Opinion on political betrayal.
- Speaker frames Republican governance as broken promises to young voters
- No specific policies, bills, or economic metrics cited
- Strong value judgment presented as fact
Original quote: “party has economically skewered young voters. That's not masculinity to make a promise and then not take care of the people that voted for you.”
Steven Miller and Republicans lack masculinity — Opinion (50/100)
At 8:45
Redefining masculinity as 'not tearing people down' — convenient new standard applied only to one side.
Why this score: Subjective redefinition.
- Masculinity redefined around empathy and lifting others
- Steven Miller singled out without specific policy examples
- Applies new criteria selectively to political opponents
Original quote: “I do not think when I look at the Republican party today that I see any masculinity. I see a Steven Miller that wants to tear people down.”
Musk, Trump, Miller only seek more power and money — Opinion (50/100)
At 9:00
Broad brush on motives — ignores any policy outcomes or stated goals beyond personal enrichment.
Why this score: Character judgment on public figures.
- Groups three individuals with different roles and records
- Claims their sole motivation is self-enrichment
- No evidence presented for the 'only' part of the claim
Original quote: “Elon Musk, people like Donald Trump, Steven Miller, these are people who gain power and gain money. And then they think their duty is to only gain more power and gain more money.”
Ken Paxton is divorcing wife for cheating on physical grounds — Dubious (45/100)
At 9:15
Divorce is public but 'physical grounds for cheating' sounds like courtroom phrasing — need the actual filing to confirm.
Why this score: Specific allegation needs verification.
- Divorce proceedings are public record
- 'Physical grounds' is legal terminology that requires checking actual documents
- Speaker presents it as established fact without source
Original quote: “The Republican party is full of Ken Paxton who's getting divorced from his wife on physical grounds for cheating.”
Trump divorced for cheating, then cheated with a porn star — OK (65/100)
At 10:30
Trump paid Stormy Daniels hush money — the divorce part is the stretch
Why this score: Partially accurate timeline.
- Trump paid Stormy Daniels $130k before 2016 election
- Divorce from Ivana was 1990 on different grounds
- Speaker conflates two separate decades
Original quote: “divorced from his wife on physical grounds for cheating. The president cheated on his wife with a porn star.”
Jesse Watters wasn't joking about deflating colleague's tires — Opinion (50/100)
At 10:57
Tone judgment call — hard to prove either way from text alone
Why this score: Subjective read on intent.
- Speaker asserts deadpan delivery proves seriousness
- No new evidence presented
- Viewers split on whether it was a bit or not
Original quote: “Jesse Waters... claims he was joking, but that segment he did where he talked about deflating the tires of his female colleague... zero chance he was joking.”
Tucker Carlson privately admitted 2020 fraud claims were false — Solid (80/100)
At 11:09
Texts from Dominion case back this — he called claims 'not even true'
Why this score: Court evidence supports the core point.
- Text messages released in Dominion lawsuit match the quote
- Carlson expressed private skepticism while airing fraud segments
- 'Tens of millions' viewership figure is reasonable for prime-time Fox
Original quote: “Tucker Carlson... went on Fox News every single day after the 2020 election and lied to tens of millions of Americans about election fraud... I'm so sick of talking about election fraud. I can't wait till we're done talking about this. This is not even true.”
TV hosts lied daily about Iran war timeline, objectives, and deaths — Dubious (40/100)
At 11:42
Broad 'every single day' claim with no specific Iran war named or receipts shown
Why this score: Sweeping generalization lacks sourcing.
- Speaker doesn't identify which Iran conflict or which hosts
- No particular false casualty figures cited
- Possible reference to past coverage but unverified here
Original quote: “these people who are going on TV every single day and lying about the Iran war, lying about the timeline, lying about the objectives, lying about the amount of deaths we've had”
Benny Johnson causes Grindr to crash in every town he visits because he's secretly hooking up with men — BS (10/100)
At 12:30
Grindr crashing = proof someone's cheating is a wild leap with zero data.
Why this score: The claim treats app crashes as evidence of personal behavior.
- No public data or reports exist showing Grindr crashes correlating with Benny Johnson's travel schedule.
- App outages happen for technical reasons unrelated to user activity in a specific location.
- This is a conspiracy-style inference presented as observable fact.
Original quote: “And you get the Benny Johnson's of the world that want to go lecture us about the importance of nuclear family month, whatever the [ __ ] that is, which is basically something they've invented because they're uncomfortable seeing pride flags out when they're driving uh to work in the morning, which…”
Democrats are taking away all rights and policing everyone's actions — Opinion (50/100)
At 14:30
Classic both-sides-do-it pivot — he just called his own party the HR department two seconds later.
Why this score: Rhetorical framing.
- Speaker equates policy disagreements with literal rights removal
- Immediately undercuts the claim by admitting Democrats sometimes overreach
- No specific rights or laws named
Original quote: “they're taking away all of our rights. They're the ones that want to police everybody's actions.”
Says Baron Trump and Don Jr. helped Andrew Tate get out of Romania — Dubious (45/100)
At 16:30
No public evidence Baron or Don Jr. intervened in Tate's Romanian case — that's a new one.
Why this score: No documented involvement from either Trump son in Tate's legal proceedings.
- Tate's Romanian detention and release were handled through Romanian courts and his legal team.
- No credible reporting links Baron or Don Jr. to any intervention or assistance.
Original quote: “have you seen the tweet from Andrew Tate? And for folks that don't know, Andrew Tate's a human trafficking miserable piece of [__] that, by the way, Baron Trump and and Don Jr. helped get out of Romania because he should be in prison right now.”
Claims he cries at the first 15 minutes of the movie Up — Personal Story (60/100)
At 18:30
Personal Pixar sob story — zero reason to doubt it.
Why this score: Straightforward personal anecdote.
- No external claim being made
- Up's opening sequence is widely known for emotional impact
- Speaker is simply describing his own reaction
Original quote: “I'm the crier in my marriage. Okay. All it takes is like the first 15 minutes of up.”
Trying to overturn election results means Paxton hates America — Opinion (50/100)
At 20:30
Calling a lawsuit 'hating America' is pure editorial — legal challenge ≠ treason.
Why this score: Subjective framing. Key distinction:
- Filing election lawsuits is protected legal activity
- Speaker equates losing a case with anti-American intent
- No evidence presented of personal hatred
Original quote: “Okay, so this guy just hates America. This guy genuinely just hates America. trying to overturn other states votes is um not masculine. As it says, masculine is about accepting a loss, moving on.”
Investigators found affair timeline: started with Senate aide, paused 2019, restarted 2020 — Dubious (45/100)
At 22:30
The restart detail sounds specific — 'investigators found' usually needs a report name, not just vibes.
Why this score: Timeline detail without source.
- Affair coverage exists but exact 2019 pause / 2020 restart isn't widely documented in major reporting
- 'Investigators found' phrasing suggests official findings that aren't linked here
- Speaker admits 'Wait a minute, I didn't know this part' — undercuts confidence
Original quote: “Investigators found the affair started with a Senate aid and ended when his wife found out in 2019 and then restarted again in 2020.”
Says politicians equivocate on hypotheticals instead of being honest — Opinion (50/100)
At 24:30
Calling out the dodge — wants straight answers even if he disagrees with them.
Why this score: Opinion on political honesty.
- Speaker prefers direct admission over evasion
- Uses Max Miller as example of avoiding accountability
- No factual claim to verify here
Original quote: “around for kids and he was like, "Well, I don't want to deal with hypotheticals because they can't answer. They have to equivocate on everything." Like, I would frankly respect these people more on this stuff. Same thing with Max Miller.”
Claims opponents ran an AI-generated threesome ad against Thomas Massie — Dubious (35/100)
At 26:30
Specific allegation with zero sourcing or evidence shown.
Why this score: No supporting evidence in transcript or web results.
- Speaker asserts a targeted AI attack ad without naming source or date
- No matching reports in current search results
- High-stakes claim left completely unsupported
Original quote: “That's what they did to Thomas Massie. They created an AI ad of him in a threesome with Ilhan Omar and AOC.”
Trump appointed Paul Ingrassia who said he has a Nazi streak — Sketchy (30/100)
At 28:30
Name is mangled ('Paulen Gracia' / 'Paul and Gracia') and no date or position details given.
Why this score: Name and context errors weaken the claim.
- Speaker appears to reference Paul Ingrassia, former GSA official
- Transcript shows repeated mispronunciations and unclear timeline
- No primary source or appointment record cited in segment
Original quote: “Donald Trump appointed somebody named Paul and Gracia, the GSA. Paulen said, "I have a Nazi streak in me. That is despicable."”
Collins vote for Kavanaugh directly caused two women's deaths — BS (15/100)
At 30:30
Kavanaugh confirmation didn't repeal Roe; Dobbs did that in 2022. Tying two deaths straight to her 2018 vote is a stretch.
Why this score: Causation chain breaks. Key issues:
- Collins voted for Kavanaugh in 2018
- Roe v. Wade overturned by Dobbs (2022), not Kavanaugh alone
- No documented link between the two named deaths and that specific vote
Original quote: “Susan Collins, who voted for Christine Nome, which directly led to the death of uh Alex Prey and Renee Nicole Good.”
Calls Graham Platner's attack on Susan Collins the cleanest hit he's heard — Opinion (50/100)
At 32:30
Pure opinion on debate quality — no fact to check.
Why this score: Subjective judgment about rhetorical effectiveness. No verifiable claim.
Original quote: “Susan Collins and Graham Platner actually made this point really well in his speech last night, has been in politics longer than Joe Biden has been in politics, okay? That is the cleanest [__] hit I've heard any candidate make on an older candidate in a long time.”
Platner won 78% in Maine Senate primary despite scandals — Unverifiable (50/100)
At 34:30
78% sounds decisive — but no election results or date given to check it.
Why this score: No primary data available in web context.
- Maine Senate primary results not appearing in current search results
- "Yesterday" relative to June 10 2026 would place it June 9
- Without official tallies, can't confirm or refute the 78% figure
Original quote: “And Platner's got to go win those people back. And by the way, he won [__] 78% of the vote yesterday in the main Senate primary after a series of scandals.”
See the full analysis with timestamps →