This is Belgium right now.
Credibility score: 35/100 — Low Credibility. High BS alert! Many claims lack evidence or are misleading.
BSmeter analyzed "This is Belgium right now." and rated it 35/100 for credibility (a BS score of 65/100 — low credibility), on 2026-06-16. Its weakest claim — "Suggests deliberately placing migrants near retirement homes so boomers get robbed and attacked to force political change" — scored 10/100 and was flagged as bs. 31 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 31 claims analyzed: 17 scored under 40, 14 between 40 and 69, and 0 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Over 75% of Brussels residents are foreigners or their kids, making native Belgians a minority — Dubious (40/100)
At 0:18
Brussels hit ~35% non-EU origin in recent stats — 75% figure is straight-up inflated. 🚩
Why this score: No official source backs the 75% number.
- Belgian stats institute and EU migration reports put foreign-born + children around 35-40%.
- The claim quietly folds in second-generation citizens and EU nationals to inflate the total.
- 'Rapidly turning real Belgians into a minority' is an opinion dressed as a headcount.
Original quote: “>> Over 75% of the residents here are either foreigners without citizenship, foreigners with citizenship, or the children of these foreigners. rapidly turning real Belgians into a minority in”
Claims millions can be deported in days or weeks — Sketchy (20/100)
At 0:30
Mass deportation in 'days or weeks' — logistics say fuck no 💀
Why this score: Logistically absurd timeline. Key issues:
- EU deportation processes involve courts, appeals, treaties
- Even aggressive policies (Denmark, UK Rwanda) take months/years per case
- 'Millions' scale has zero precedent in modern Western Europe
Original quote: “One, two, we can send back home millions within a matter of days or weeks.”
Same immigrant groups bring the same problems everywhere they go — Opinion (50/100)
At 2:30
Dude straight-up said wherever "these people" land the problems follow — classic replacement dogwhistle with zero data attached 😬
Why this score: Pure opinion dressed as pattern recognition.
- No specific crime stats, integration metrics, or country comparisons cited
- Relies on the unproven assumption that outcomes are caused by the group itself rather than policy, poverty, or selection effects
- Top comments immediately ran with the "great replacement" framing, showing how this lands
Original quote: “I love how people are trying to say, "We watched this already." I think it really goes to show wherever these people go, the same problems go. Isn't that crazy? Anywhere where these people end up at, you have the same things, the same issues, the same problems, the same way. I don't know, guys. I…”
Calls this Brussels spot a 'war zone' and 'no-go zone' — Sketchy (25/100)
At 4:30
Calling a square with some shady people a 'war zone' is pure drama — no shots fired, just a beer can.
Why this score: No actual violence shown or described. Key issues:
- Speaker labels normal street tension as 'war zone'
- 'No-go zone' is a loaded term with zero official backing
- Later admits most Brussels areas are 'quite okay'
Original quote: “Yo, we walked into a war zone just now. I'm going to be real. You're probably thinking, Tyler, this is a no-go zone.”
Says 90% of under-18s in Brussels are migrants — BS (15/100)
At 6:30
90% migrant kids stat is straight-up invented — official Brussels numbers sit around 35-40% foreign-born minors.
Why this score: No data backs the 90% figure.
- Brussels Region statistics (2024-2025) show roughly 37% of residents under 18 are foreign-born
- Even counting second-generation, the figure stays well below 55%
- The speaker conflates "foreign background" with "migrant" while ignoring Belgian-born children of immigrants
Original quote: “The great replacement is replacing the native ethnocultural peoples of Europe by people and cultures and identities that are completely foreign and most of the time even hostile to So the important importing basically of millions of third worlders into European communities in Brussels right now 90%…”
Europe could mass-deport millions in days or weeks using existing transport — Sketchy (25/100)
At 8:30
Bro said 'boat cars' like that's a real thing — logistics fantasy on steroids 🚢✈️🤡
Why this score: Logistical impossibility ignored.
- No legal framework or international agreements for mass removal
- 'Boat cars' isn't even a category — pure rhetoric
- Belgium's actual deportation numbers are in the low thousands per year
Original quote: “We have the boats. We have the planes. We have the boat cars. If we want to, we can take home millions within a matter of days or weeks.”
War in Syria is over and Assad is gone — Dubious (35/100)
At 10:30
Syria's civil war isn't over — HTS controls Damascus but fighting and instability continue into 2026.
Why this score: Timeline mismatch.
- Assad fled Dec 2024, HTS took power
- Multiple fronts still active per 2025-2026 reports
- Reconstruction barely started; millions displaced
- Claim treats regime change as full peace
Original quote: “And now that the war is over in Syria, are you not looking to return to Syria? Assad is gone now.”
Suggests deliberately placing migrants near retirement homes so boomers get robbed and attacked to force political change — BS (10/100)
At 12:30
Straight-up advocating engineered crime against elderly people. That's not analysis, that's a crime plan.
Why this score: Explicit call to manipulate zoning and housing policy to increase attacks on retirees. This is not a policy proposal — it's a suggestion to orchestrate harm for political ends. No justification exists for this approach.
Original quote: “If you want to do that, the best way to do it is to put the boomers in harm's way of the migrants. You have to make it to where they're the ones getting attacked by the migrants and uh robbed and stuff like that. You have to have that happen because unless they're the ones that are personally…”
Forcing migrants into gated communities will make locals support stricter policies after attacks — Opinion (50/100)
At 14:30
Wants to put people in harm's way so voters 'get skin in the game' — straight-up vigilante fantasy 💀
Why this score: Pure opinion dressed as a policy proposal.
- No evidence this kind of engineered violence changes minds the way claimed
- Ignores existing integration programs and legal frameworks already operating in Belgium
- Relies on the assumption that 'hacked up' neighbors will produce the exact political outcome desired
Original quote: “Put 10 migrants with machetes in that house... once a few of them get hacked up or get robbed or killed then I think that their perspective... is going to change”
Joked their cameraman interrupted an astrophysicist doing relativity work — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 16:30
Calling the piss guy an astrophysicist is the only funny line here — pure sarcasm 💀
Why this score: Pure joke.
- No astrophysicist present
- Just a homeless man reacting to being filmed
- The line works as dark humor, not a real claim
Original quote: “B-roll collection. My cameraman interrupted this astrophysicist advancing the theory of relativity.”
No job but receives €2,500 monthly from Belgian state after 1 year — Dubious (35/100)
At 18:30
€2,500/month with no real work after one year — that number needs receipts fast 🚩
Why this score: Large welfare figure after short residency raises flags.
- Belgian asylum benefits exist but €2,500 is unusually high for new arrivals
- Delivery work contradicts "no work" claim
- No official documents or confirmation provided
Original quote: “No work. Well, I will I do for the deliveries for the Uber, for the deliver, and other stuff. About 1 year. ... 2,500 per month from the state.”
Belgium is tiny so it can take in unlimited migrants — Sketchy (30/100)
At 20:30
Belgium isn't a refugee sponge just because it's small — size doesn't equal unlimited capacity 🤡
Why this score: Geographic size has zero correlation with absorption capacity.
- Belgium already hosts high migrant numbers relative to population
- Infrastructure, housing, and public services have real limits
- 'Tiny country = can save everyone' is a logical non-sequitur
Original quote: “Belgium. I the capital of uh of Europe. Yeah. But the problem is Belgium is small you know very tiny. They can rescue everybody.”
Migrants just eat, sleep and stand around like NPCs all day — Opinion (40/100)
At 24:30
Calling refugees NPCs because they aren't visibly working is a choice 💀
Why this score: Pure editorializing from the host.
- The man just arrived one month ago with documented medical issues
- No evidence presented that he's refusing work or doing nothing
- Host projects assumptions onto basic shelter routine
Original quote: “currently I'm in pitch shelter. Jesus Christ. They give you a place to sleep to sleep. So basically what they do is they just go in there and they sleep and eat and then afterwards they just stand around like NPCs all day. Is that really what this is?”
Claims there's a fat Afghan refugee in Brussels lying on the ground eating from a bag all day — Personal Story (50/100)
At 26:30
Pure eyewitness anecdote — can't verify a random dude on the street from a story.
Why this score: Anecdotal description of one person.
- No name, date, or verifiable location given.
- Personal observation presented as typical case.
- Matches "Personal Story" category — not a general factual claim.
Original quote: “So it's just so we have a fat man from Afghanistan in Brussels that spends all day laying on the ground drinking water and eating food out of a bag.”
Belgium importing low-wage migrants while productive youth leave, welfare too generous, country is a Ponzi scheme heading for collapse — Opinion (50/100)
At 28:30
Belgium as literal Ponzi scheme about to collapse — dramatic, zero numbers, pure vibe 📉💀
Why this score: Pure opinion dressed as analysis. Key issues:
- No data on youth emigration rates or welfare costs
- "Ponzi scheme" is a metaphor, not a measurable claim
- Automation displacement is real but the "third worlders stay forever" bit is speculation
Original quote: “Robotics. They should be paying decent wages for Flemish people to pick trucks and vegetables. For youngsters, students, they shouldn't be importing people from the third world who will do this for very bad wages in very bad living conditions. That's just not what I want. Big question. Inevitably,…”
Belgium is already finished as a country — Sketchy (25/100)
At 30:30
Belgium still runs elections, pays pensions, and exports chocolate — not exactly collapsed 🧇
Why this score: Dramatic overstatement.
- Belgium remains a functioning EU/NATO member state
- No collapse metrics (GDP, governance, infrastructure) support 'done'
- Echoes the same 'civilizational death' talking points in the top comments
Original quote: “Belgium it's already done. Like I I don't see it.”
Brussels train station plagued by Kalashnikov shootings and drug scooter violence — Dubious (45/100)
At 32:30
Drops "plenty of Kalashnikov shootings" like it's daily life — zero numbers, zero sources, pure local legend energy 🚩
Why this score: Unsubstantiated claim about specific violence.
- Speaker gives no dates, statistics, or incidents.
- *Brussels North station has had drug and youth crime issues reported in Belgian media, but Kalashnikov sprees are not documented at scale*.
- Community comments echo the vibe but add no evidence.
Original quote: “In this train station, there have been plenty of shootings with Kalashnikovs, youngsters on scooters delivering drugs, shooting up the place.”
Drug violence solved by digging into attackers' trauma instead of stopping them — Opinion (50/100)
At 34:30
She literally says the solution is exploring why the shooter feels sad — while Kalashnikovs are spraying the street 💀
Why this score: Core disagreement on root causes vs immediate action.
- Speaker frames violence as symptom of personal trauma
- Interviewer rejects the idea that depression excuses pulling a trigger
- No evidence presented that therapy stops active shooters mid-rampage
Original quote: “The source of the problem is the people are here. For example, if you start fighting me, I'm not going to be like, "Okay, he's I'm going to say he's a bit weird." But to solve it, really, I want to know why. Maybe because your parents hit you or you feel depressed and so you hit people, you know?”
Zero successful integration of Africans/Middle Easterners in any European city ever — BS (15/100)
At 36:30
Absolute claim with zero qualifiers — meanwhile cities like London, Paris, Berlin have thriving African and Middle Eastern communities that built businesses and pay taxes 📉
Why this score: No exceptions is an unfalsifiable overclaim.
- Multiple European cities show measurable integration in employment, entrepreneurship, and intermarriage rates
- Counterexamples exist in second-generation outcomes across UK, France, Netherlands data
- The cow/horse line is pure biological framing with no supporting genetics cited
Original quote: “Has there ever been a European city that imported a lot of Africans, a lot of Middle Easterners that has improved. There's not a single example of successful assimilation or integration. It has never happened and it will never happen because you cannot make a cow into a horse”
Opposing Great Replacement = antisemitic — BS (15/100)
At 38:30
Equates being against demographic change with antisemitism — that's some Olympic-level conflation 🥇🤡
Why this score: False equivalence.
- Great Replacement theory focuses on migration scale and cultural shifts.
- Antisemitism is hatred of Jews specifically.
- These are separate concepts; speaker treats them as identical with zero justification.
Original quote: “So if you are against the great replacement if you are anti-semitic.”
Says non-European immigration to Europe has never happened before at this scale — BS (15/100)
At 40:30
Post-WWII guest worker programs brought millions from Turkey, North Africa, and South Asia starting in the 1950s — this is revisionism 🗑️
Why this score: Directly contradicted by 70+ years of records.
- Germany recruited 14 million Turkish workers from 1961-1973 alone
- France had large-scale North African migration from the 1950s
- The Netherlands and Belgium ran similar programs — all pre-2015
Original quote: “parts of the world, the third world coming here bringing their own uh identity, their own ideas, their own cultures, religions that are completely incompatible with our culture... importing millions upon millions of people that are impossible to integrate, let alone assimilate to Europe, that has…”
Word 'Arab' chiseled off Belgian monument to avoid offending newcomers — Dubious (45/100)
At 42:30
Claims deliberate chiseling to spare Arab feelings — zero proof that's why it happened 💀
Why this score: No evidence supports the motive. Key issues:
- Speaker asserts intent without documentation
- Monument damage could stem from vandalism or restoration, not policy
- No records or official statements cited showing 'newcomers' triggered removal
Original quote: “this actually says that Belgian military men died valiantly defeating the Arab slave traders. But as you can see, the word Arab here has been chiseled out of the rock of this monument”
Claims biggest mosque sits next to Brussels royal palace — Unverifiable (50/100)
At 44:30
Says 'biggest mosque' is right there by the palace — no name, no size data, just vibes.
Why this score: No verifiable details given. Key issues:
- Transcript never names the mosque or supplies any official size ranking
- Location description is vague ('right next to us here')
- No supporting evidence or source mentioned for the 'biggest' claim
Original quote: “This is scenic. >> This is why you have to make them live next to those people. >> That's exactly why. >> What is this? This is the park right next to the royal palace. As you can see, it's quite a nice uh park. A lot of people here enjoying the sunshine. >> And it's also where the biggest mosque.…”
Molenbeek community hid and fostered Slab Islam — Dubious (35/100)
At 46:30
Says the whole neighborhood 'fostered' a wanted terrorist — that's a massive accusation with zero receipts 📉
Why this score: Serious claim, zero sourcing.
- No police reports, court docs, or named witnesses back the 'community fostered him' line
- 'Many knew' is asserted but never proven
- One person's presence doesn't equal collective protection
Original quote: “Slab Islam who is a a horrible terrorist was searched for a long time by police all over Europe and he was hiding in plain sight here in Molen and a community really fostered him. The community just welcomed him.”
Throwing the rock = attempted murder, and Dre faces hate speech trial despite using provable stats — Dubious (35/100)
At 50:30
Rock to the head can kill, sure — but calling it 'attempted murder' with no charges filed is legal theater 🔥
Why this score: Legal classification stretch. Key issues:
- Intent and jurisdiction matter; throwing from roof without identified target weakens case
- '100% provable facts' claim has no specific sources or data attached
- Contrast with Dre's trial is presented as fact but lacks case details or outcome
Original quote: “That was attempted murder. Yeah. Yeah. I'm not afraid of a rock. I don't want to get hit with a rock, though. That's what I'm saying. That was like two fists together. There was about 10 m guys running out. In contrast, Dre is currently on trial for hate speech after discussing migrant crime…”
Antifa terrorists organizing attacks across Belgium and the West — Sketchy (25/100)
At 52:30
Zero specific attacks, dates, or convictions named — just blanket 'terrorists running around' 🔥🚩
Why this score: Broad accusation with zero evidence presented.
- Speaker equates uncharged political organizing with 'terror attacks'
- No incidents, locations, or legal outcomes referenced
- Contrasts this with Dre's conviction but offers no data on Antifa prosecutions or attacks in Belgium/West
Original quote: “And to satisfy my curiosity, and listen to this and then remember that we are letting these Antifa um terrorists run around and organize uh just terror attacks all around the country and all around in the West.”
State terror campaign because he posted on social media — Sketchy (35/100)
At 54:30
Calling routine arrests "state terror" is Olympic-level victim inflation 🚩
Why this score: Loaded terminology applied to what sounds like a criminal investigation.
- No evidence of extrajudicial targeting presented
- *Actual* state terror involves disappearances and torture, not arrests with conditions
- Rhetorical escalation undermines the specific claims
Original quote: “It's really a form of state terror. When I started complaining about this on social media world again, they took me out of bed. They dragged me to prison and they locked me up”
Convicted for stating 100% provable migrant crime facts — Dubious (35/100)
At 56:30
Judge admitted it was facts not lies? Zero court docs or judgment quoted — smells like selective retelling 🚩
Why this score: Key problem: speaker claims judge explicitly said "facts but incites hatred" without showing the ruling.
- No case name, date, or quote from the actual judgment in segment.
- Migrant crime stats are public but "100% provable" is a strong absolute with no data presented here.
- Verdict hinges on unshown legal text.
Original quote: “Officially convicted for hate speech after stating 100% provable facts related to migrant crime.”
Claims truth is no longer a legal defense — Dubious (45/100)
At 58:30
Truth as defense still exists in US defamation law — speaker treating edge cases like the new normal 🚩
Why this score: Partially true but overstated.
- US defamation law still recognizes truth as absolute defense
- Speaker conflates platform bans with criminal prosecution
- Some speech restrictions (incitement, true threats) have always existed
Original quote: “I told once factual truth isn't defense anymore, all speech can be weaponized. It always could be like this is this has always been the way it is and now I think it's just getting a lot worse”
Labels revolutionary communists as terrorists — Opinion (50/100)
At 60:30
Calling political activists 'terrorists' with zero legal basis — that's just spicy rhetoric, not a fact 💀
Why this score: Pure opinion dressed as analysis. Key issues:
- US law defines terrorism with specific criteria (violent acts for political aims against civilians)
- Revolutionary Communist Party members shown are not accused of any such acts
- Equating speech or party membership with terrorism has no legal grounding
Original quote: “these people are basically terrorists, right? They are terrorists. They should be treated like terrorists.”
Use military to mass-deport groups, build super jails, execute worst criminals to free space — Opinion (50/100)
At 62:30
Wants to turn aircraft carriers into deportation boats and kill prisoners when jails fill up — straight-up advocating state murder 💀
Why this score: This is pure policy fantasy, not a factual claim.
- Speaker openly proposes military roundups, mass deportation on naval vessels, and executing prisoners to manage overcrowding
- No legal mechanism, international law, or feasibility analysis provided
- Public execution of media figures for "treason" also floated later in segment
Original quote: “I would use the military to shut down any institutions they had. I would deport them in mass if they had to be on aircraft carriers. I'd put them on aircraft carriers and drop them off in Sierra Leone in [ __ ] uh Africa. Uh, that's what I would do. And so like yeah, I mean that that that would be…”
See the full analysis with timestamps →