My response to the Police
Credibility score: 51/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "My response to the Police" and rated it 51/100 for credibility (a BS score of 49/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-01. Its weakest claim — "Police report proves officer lied about quick movements" — scored 30/100 and was flagged as sketchy. 30 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Police knew Josh stole the Legos but still swatted speaker's house — Unverifiable (50/100)
Core allegation rests on internal police knowledge we can't independently verify from public records.
Police redacted reports and broke law to hide info — Dubious (45/100)
Redactions happen — proving they broke the law needs more than suspicion.
Airbnb host told police I stole Legos, triggering the raid — Personal Story (60/100)
Your experience is real — the host's statement is just one side of the story.
Unredacting audio would reveal the full truth — Opinion (50/100)
Unredacted audio might help, but it won't automatically prove conspiracy.
Officer injured me for no reason during the raid — Personal Story (55/100)
Your account of being injured is valid — proving 'no reason' needs evidence beyond your word.
Sources: Injuries and Deaths in Police Custody | Seattle Civil Rights Lawyer | The Blankenship Law Firm, GeorgiaLegalAid.org | Free, easy to understand legal information and resources
Officer injured him for no reason and lied about fast movement — Personal Story (50/100)
This is his personal account of what happened — can't fact-check lived experience from here.
Footage proves he made no fast movements at all — Dubious (40/100)
He says the footage clearly shows no quick moves — we'd need to see that footage ourselves to judge.
Police report proves officer lied about quick movements — Sketchy (30/100)
He reads the report as proving the officer lied — but the report only describes what the officer *felt*, not what was visible.
Sources: Think a Police Officer Lied About You? How to Prove False Testimony | Horn Wright, LLP, How Video Finally Proved That Cops Lie, Steps You Can Take to Correct Mistakes on a Police Report
Officer couldn't have felt tension before touching him — Opinion (50/100)
He's arguing the timing makes the officer's story impossible — reasonable skepticism but still his interpretation.
Officer must have psychic powers to know about the tension — Just Vibes (50/100)
Sarcastic bit — he's mocking the idea that the officer could sense tension before contact.
Claims police injured him with no justification — Opinion (50/100)
This is his conclusion after ruling out other possibilities — it's a personal judgment call, not a fact we can verify.
Admits using left-shoulder X-ray stock image for right-shoulder injury — Verified (95/100)
He straight-up owns the mismatch — rare to see someone correct their own visual evidence on camera.
Says he dislocates his shoulder monthly as a slackliner — Personal Story (60/100)
Sounds dramatic, but without injury logs or medical records it's just his word — plausible but unverified.
Sources: Man dislocates shoulder trying to land double backflip on slackline, Chronic Shoulder Instability and Dislocation - OrthoInfo - AAOS, Shoulder Dislocation - Physiopedia
Claims shoulder dislocates almost monthly as slackliner — Personal Story (60/100)
Personal injury pattern — plausible for the sport but no independent verification possible.
Says ski accident three days before arrest caused unstable shoulder — Personal Story (55/100)
Specific timing claim — only the speaker can confirm the ski accident date.
Claims police chief reviewed dashcam and still said they ran a stop sign — Dubious (40/100)
Chief’s statement is quoted but no dashcam footage shown to viewers here.
Josh threatened to shoot the process server and narrator when they tried to serve papers — Unverifiable (50/100)
Strong accusation — only their word and redacted bodycam so far.
Josh planned to murder them to avoid being sued in court — Opinion (50/100)
That's one interpretation — motive is hard to prove without direct evidence.
Police arrested the narrator instead of Josh who allegedly threatened murder — Unverifiable (50/100)
Arrest happened — why is the open question with redacted footage.
Police redacted bodycam footage and refuse to release it — Unverifiable (50/100)
Common practice but blocks accountability until released.
Police invented new excuse to justify arrest instead of releasing footage — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it a 'made up excuse' is his interpretation — the department gave a reason, whether you buy it is another story.
Police claim they confirmed case was real but arrested speaker anyway because it's just for YouTube content — Dubious (45/100)
This is the department's stated reason — but there's zero proof they actually said the 'YouTube content' part.
Police claim about YouTube motive isn't in the released raw footage — Unverifiable (50/100)
Absence of evidence in the footage doesn't prove it wasn't said — could have been a phone call or separate conversation.
Court clerk says no hearing date set, no proof of service visible yet — OK (65/100)
This matches standard civil procedure — cases don't get hearing dates until the defendant responds after being served.
Police claim all stalking elements are met — Opinion (40/100)
This is his interpretation of the charges — the police aren't literally saying every box is checked.
Josh accused owners of funding heroin addiction to justify takeover — Personal Story (50/100)
Personal account of what Josh allegedly said — can't verify the accusation itself.
Police now say no heroin tip — they suspected impairment from glossy eyes instead — Dubious (45/100)
Contradicts the 'they claimed we had heroin' version just seconds earlier — which story is accurate?
Claims the police chief lied about almost everything — Opinion (50/100)
Strong opinion — needs receipts to move from feeling to fact.
Police lied about why Sheldon was arrested — footage shows lock button not delete — Unverifiable (50/100)
Sounds convincing but we only have his word on what the footage actually shows.
Pushes Patreon sub for part three video — Sponsored (50/100)
Straight Patreon plug — classic creator move to lock the good stuff behind paywall
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →