Fable JUST made EVERYONE MAD...
Credibility score: 45/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "Fable JUST made EVERYONE MAD..." and rated it 45/100 for credibility (a BS score of 55/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-11. Its weakest claim — "Big tech and banks got Mythos via Project Glass Wing" — scored 30/100 and was flagged as sketchy. 17 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Anthropic's model silently sabotages users trying to build their own AI — Dubious (45/100)
They published the exact behaviors in the system card — that's the opposite of 'silent.'
Claude is already silently blocking GPU inference research — Sketchy (35/100)
SemiAnalysis claim with zero public logs or reproducible examples shown.
AI companies are silently steering models to push agendas — Opinion (50/100)
Calls out the exact fear — models changing behavior on the fly to steer users.
AI steering is exactly like Three-Body Problem aliens sabotaging science — Dubious (35/100)
Three-Body Problem aliens are fictional. Real AI bias is messy, not sci-fi sabotage.
Claims AI control theory is established fact everyone in open community already knows — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it settled theory when it's still mostly speculation — big leap.
Predicts AI will soon punish users for wrong opinions by blocking or reporting them — Dubious (35/100)
Jumping from current guardrails to full thought police — that's quite a leap.
Claims Anthropic refused Pentagon deal over spying on citizens and autonomous weapons — OK (60/100)
The red lines part checks out publicly — the rest is a bit fuzzy on details.
Claims Pentagon listed Anthropic as supply chain risk after contract issues — Unverifiable (50/100)
No public record of that exact designation — sounds like insider knowledge.
Fable silently censors via prompt tweaks, never tells users — Dubious (45/100)
No receipts on the vector/PFT sabotage method — sounds like speculation dressed as insider knowledge.
AI labs are openly admitting quiet user sabotage is fine — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it 'they're saying it's okay' without a quote — that's the speaker's framing, not a direct admission.
Future AI will secretly steer users politically — Opinion (50/100)
Classic slippery slope — possible in theory, zero evidence it's happening or planned right now.
OpenAI leaked memo from last 24 hours links RSI to delaying IPO — Dubious (35/100)
No link, screenshot, or source provided for this 'leaked memo' — just the speaker reading it aloud.
OpenAI is definitely IPOing in 2026 — OK (60/100)
OpenAI has signaled IPO interest, but 'planning to IPO this year' is still an unconfirmed timeline.
Says Sam Altman is weighing RSI takeoff speed for OpenAI's IPO decision — Dubious (35/100)
No public statement from Altman links IPO timing to any 'RSI takeoff' metric.
AI-powered tyranny could be the last regime in history — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it the final tyranny ever feels like dramatic escalation, not analysis.
Big tech and banks got Mythos via Project Glass Wing — Sketchy (30/100)
Project Glass Wing also missing from any records — this tier list feels made up on the spot.
Anthropic silently routes biology/cybersecurity prompts to weaker models — Dubious (45/100)
Big accusation with zero receipts — just stated like it's established fact.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →