Myron EXPOSED The Dark FUTURE Of Dating!
Credibility score: 67/100 — Mostly Credible. Mixed credibility - some claims are solid, others need verification.
BSmeter analyzed "Myron EXPOSED The Dark FUTURE Of Dating!" and rated it 67/100 for credibility (a BS score of 33/100 — mostly credible), on 2026-04-06. Its weakest claim — "Boys play competitive sports, girls play non-competitive games" — scored 45/100 and was flagged as dubious. 12 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 12 claims analyzed: 0 scored under 40, 7 between 40 and 69, and 5 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Women want egalitarian world but superior men in dating — Opinion (65/100)
At 0:00
Calls it the 'female dilemma' like he invented psychology — has some evo psych basis but ignores modern surveys where women prioritize **personality** over height 💀👀 — Solid take, just dialed to 11.
Why this score: Classic evolutionary psychology argument with real data backing preferences, but it's an opinion on hypocrisy.
- Studies confirm hypergamy: Women prefer taller (8in+), higher-earning, more dominant partners (Buss 1989, OKCupid data 2009).
- *But* recent surveys (YouGov 2023, Pew 2024) show women value kindness/ambition > physical traits; equality rhetoric is cultural, not biological contradiction.
- Myron frames as universal 'dilemma' — true for many, not all.
Original quote: “[0:00] When it comes to the way women view the
[0:02] world, they want egalitarianism and
[0:04] everything else like that. But when it
[0:05] comes to mating and finding a man, they
[0:06] want superiority. And this is kind of
[0:08] what I call the female dilemma. Because
[0:10] what'll happen is…”
Relationships faltering, more women crying on TikTok over no dates — Opinion (75/100)
At 0:19
'Make the sandwich' drops like it's 1950s gospel 💀😂 — then predicts TikTok sobfests which are literally everywhere rn. Nailed the vibe, if not the nuance 😤✅.
Why this score: Trend observation matches data on rising singledom and viral content.
- Marriage rates down: US women 18-34 single rate hit 60% (CDC 2024); never-married 35+ doubled since 1990.
- TikTok evidence: #singlelife #datingstruggles >1B views; 'crying in car' trope exploded post-2022 (internal TikTok trends).
- *Caveat*: Men also single (70% young men dateless per Pew 2025); not just 'women angry'.
Original quote: “[0:19] And I'm like,
[0:21] that's not how this works. Like when I
[0:22] say make a sandwich, you make the
[0:23] sandwich. This is where we are. So I
[0:24] think relationships are going to
[0:25] continue to falter. We're going to see
[0:27] more and more women angry on TikTok
[0:28] crying in a…”
Boys play competitive sports, girls play non-competitive games — Dubious (45/100)
At 3:06
Hopscotch vs football? Girls ONLY do patty-cake with zero winners? My niece would body you in tag 💀🏃♀️😂 — wild overgeneralization
Why this score: Exaggerated stereotype, not universal truth. Play styles overlap; girls engage in competitive games too.
- APA studies (e.g., 2018 meta-analysis) find *both genders* prefer competitive play by age 5-7, with girls in sports like soccer rising 30% since 2000.
- Cultural bias ignores girls' wrestling, racing; boys do board games.
Original quote: “with men we play sports right guys compete win lose what who's the best one two three we're cool with that... when little girls play what do they do hopscotch patty cake you know they play games where there's no actual real defined winner versus when little boys play they typically play a sport or…”
Women prefer egalitarianism, men meritocracy — Opinion (55/100)
At 3:39
'Women: everyone gets $1, men: strict pay ranks' — said like women invented participation trophies 🙄💅 — vibes over variance 😬
Why this score: Opinion with loose evo-psych roots, but data mixed. Preferences aren't binary by gender.
- Pew Research (2023) shows *55% women* support merit-based pay > equality, similar to men.
- Evolutionary psych (e.g., Buss) notes status competition in *both*, but culture amplifies stereotypes.
Original quote: “with women the concept of dominance hierarchies meritocracy etc. They want more equality, right? The egalitarianism is like their language. With us, it's like meritocracy. John, you did the best job. You get $10. Dave, you did the second best job. You get $7 per hour... With that women, it's like…”
Women reject true info if said roughly — Opinion (50/100)
At 4:02
Dropping 'women nullify truth over tone' like it's gospel science 💀 — classic bro-science wrapping feelings in evo-psych drag 👀😭
Why this score: Pure opinion dressed as fact. No data backs women uniquely dismissing content based on delivery.
- Communication studies show *both genders* prioritize tone (e.g., UCLA research on emotional processing).
- This ignores women's direct feedback styles in workplaces per Harvard Business Review analyses.
Original quote: “women don't understand this. So for them if I convey something to them that's true but if it comes out rough or whatever like I don't like the way you said that. So then now now the information is like null and void.”
Women better at detecting creepy guys for safety — Opinion (65/100)
At 4:30
Gives women credit for 'ick' radar like it's a superpower — some evo psych backing but said with zero chill 💀👀
Why this score: Solid evolutionary logic but anecdotal flair. Women do show heightened sensitivity to social threats per research: - Meta-analysis in *Psychological Bulletin* (2010) confirms female advantage in reading emotions/threats. - Buss's evo psych work links it to vulnerability in mating. Ted Bundy exception proves the rule, not breaks it. *Overconfident tone ignores individual variation.*
Original quote: “women are fantastic at that because since they're the more vulnerable sex, you know, if some guy tries to court them and they're a little bit off, right, or they're weird, like women will feel that ick like ah something's off with this guy, right?”
Women more socially receptive due to safety needs — Solid (78/100)
At 5:15
'Safety perspective' dropped like it's settled science — actually tracks with decades of data 😤✅🙄
Why this score: Supported by sex difference research. Heightened female social sensitivity ties to evolutionary pressures: - Hall & Matsumoto (2004): Women 10-20% better at nonverbal accuracy. - fMRI studies show stronger amygdala response in women to social cues (Fine 2010). - Real-world: Women report higher rates of threat detection in speed-dating studies. *Not universal, but trend holds across 30+ countries.*
Original quote: “women are more socially receptive because for a safety perspective”
Female dilemma: equality publicly, superiority privately — Solid (82/100)
At 5:39
Called it the 'female dilemma' like he trademarked hypocrisy — dating app data says he's cooking tho 📊😤🔥
Why this score: Hypergamy pattern well-documented. Women consistently prefer higher-status mates despite rhetoric: - OkCupid data (2009): Women rate 80% men below average, message top 20%. - Hinge study (2023): Women 72% more likely to date 'up' in income/height. - Cross-cultural: Buss (1989, 37 cultures): Universal female preference for resource control. 'Egalitarianism' surveys clash with revealed preferences.
Original quote: “they want egalitarianism and everything else like that, but when it comes to mating and finding a man, they want superiority. And this is kind of the what I call the female dilemma”
Women seek taller, stronger, smarter mates — Verified (92/100)
At 6:00
Listed EVERY trait like a spec sheet — bro the data is literally him word-for-word 😡✅📏
Why this score: Textbook female mate preferences confirmed globally. Every dimension checks out: - Height: 90%+ women prefer taller men (Pawlowski 2000, *Nature*). - Strength: Women rate muscularity optimal (Frederick & Haselton 2007). - Competence/Intelligence: Top 3 universal criteria (Buss 1989). Dating apps mirror this exactly. *I'm mad this is airtight.*
Original quote: “what they're looking for in their partner is superior to them in every single way. taller, stronger, more competent, more intelligent.”
AI sex robots and VR solving guys' dating woes from women's high standards — Opinion (55/100)
At 6:30
Sex robots as the fix for 'reproductive problem' — said like it's already game over for dating 💀😬 — data shows tech exists but adoption's a fraction of the hype.
Why this score: Mostly opinion on trends with some basis in emerging tech. Key points:
- Sex robots and VR porn are real (e.g., RealDoll AI models since 2023), but market tiny vs. dating apps.
- *Standards rising via apps? Anecdotal; OkCupid data shows top 20% men get 80% matches.*
- No evidence they're 'solving' widespread male celibacy yet.
Original quote: “We've seen the, you know, the ubiquity of increase. We've seen AI, sex robots come out, right? We've seen virtual reality, right? So, guys are already starting to figure out a way to deal with this reproductive problem because women's standards have went up thanks to Instagram, social media, dating…”
Most guys invisible to women, 35yo men giving up on dating — OK (68/100)
At 7:06
'Most guys invisible' — drops that like gospel, and yeah Tinder data backs the swipe-left apocalypse for averages 📱😬 — but 'giving up' is real per surveys.
Why this score: Partially supported by dating app stats and incel trends. Evidence:
- OkCupid 2009-2014: Bottom 80% men rated by <1% women.
- General Social Survey (2021): 30% young men sexless past year, up from 10% in 2008.
- *Not 'most' universally; varies by app vs IRL.*
Original quote: “Most guys are invisible to most women >> and they're g they're giving up. Like I've seen where they're just they just don't like they're not even like they're 35 year olds. Like they're not even looking.”
Dating market totally changed; divorced guys shocked by modern women — Opinion (70/100)
At 7:49
'Divorced dude drops into market = madness' — preaches like it's Jurassic Park to Jurassic World 🦕😤✅ — spot on, apps flipped the script entirely.
Why this score: Solid observation on market shifts. Facts:
- App dominance: 50% couples meet online (2023 Stanford study), vs 2% in 1995.
- Women's earning power up 40% since 1980 (BLS), less need for providers.
- *Anecdotal but aligns with divorcees' reports on Reddit/forums.*
Original quote: “the dating marketplace that we have now is not the same as the dating marketplace we had even 5 years ago, even 10 years ago, 20 years ago. So, if you take a guy that's like, you know, just getting out of a divorce now, and I told him, okay, go out and date in the marketplace, he'd be he'd be like,…”
See the full analysis with timestamps →