SOVEREIGN CITIZEN Claims “No Jurisdiction” — Judge SHATTERS Every Excuse
Credibility score: 21/100 — Low Credibility. High BS alert! Many claims lack evidence or are misleading.
Claims analyzed
Claims no contract with public defenders so they can't represent him — BS (15/100)
Public defenders are court-appointed by law, not hired via personal contract — sovereign citizen classic.
Sources: Can a public defender refuse to represent someone?, Can a public defender refuse to represent a client if they believe the client is guilty
Claims the court lacks jurisdiction over him — BS (15/100)
Sovereign citizen 'no jurisdiction' line — courts have ruled this nonsense for decades.
Claims court lacks personal and subject matter jurisdiction because it's a trust matter — BS (10/100)
Sovereign citizen 'trust matter' line is the same script judges hear every week — courts reject it every time.
Claims police and towing company acted under 'color of law' so jurisdiction doesn't apply — BS (5/100)
'Color of law' claims don't erase jurisdiction — they just get you laughed out of federal court too.
Claims Michigan is a fictitious entity with no injured party so no crime occurred — BS (0/100)
Michigan being 'fictitious' is peak sovereign nonsense — the state has locked up plenty of people who tried this.
Claims court has no jurisdiction because it's 'trust property' — BS (10/100)
Sovereign citizen 'trust property' argument gets zero traction in any real court — pure fantasy.
Offers 'certificate of security' to settle charges — Dubious (50/100)
Dug deeper — the evidence is genuinely split here.
Sources: Online Privacy and Security Certification Service Settles FTC Charges | Federal Trade Commission
Judge explains no probable cause hearing yet — next stage — Verified (95/100)
Judge correctly lays out the actual process. Rare to see someone this patient with the nonsense.
Insists 'demir' and standing mute are different and judge has no degree — BS (5/100)
Telling a sitting judge they have 'no legal degree' while mangling basic procedure — peak sovereign citizen energy.
Prosecution must prove both a crime and an injured party — BS (15/100)
That's the classic sovereign-citizen script — courts don't require an 'injured party' for criminal cases.
Defendant accuses judge of bias for denying extra week — Opinion (30/100)
Calling routine scheduling 'bias' after rambling through the hearing — classic sovereign move.
Claims to be executive of a trust and estate owner, not the individual charged — BS (15/100)
Straight out of the sovereign citizen script — rebrand yourself as a trust to dodge jurisdiction.
Cites UN and American declarations on indigenous rights to claim exemption — BS (15/100)
Those declarations don't give individuals immunity from criminal court jurisdiction
Claims court lacks jurisdiction because he is indigenous — BS (15/100)
Sovereign citizen 'indigenous lands' dodge — Michigan courts still run on Michigan law, not vibes.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →