SOVEREIGN CITIZEN Claims “No Jurisdiction” — Judge SHATTERS Every Excuse
Credibility score: 21/100 — Low Credibility. High BS alert! Many claims lack evidence or are misleading.
BSmeter analyzed "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN Claims “No Jurisdiction” — Judge SHATTERS Every Excuse" and rated it 21/100 for credibility (a BS score of 79/100 — low credibility), on 2026-06-11. Its weakest claim — "Claims Michigan is a fictitious entity with no injured party so no crime occurred" — scored 0/100 and was flagged as bs. 14 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Claims no contract with public defenders so they can't represent him — BS (15/100)
Public defenders are court-appointed by law, not hired via personal contract — sovereign citizen classic.
Sources: Can a public defender refuse to represent someone?, Can a public defender refuse to represent a client if they believe the client is guilty
Claims the court lacks jurisdiction over him — BS (15/100)
Sovereign citizen 'no jurisdiction' line — courts have ruled this nonsense for decades.
Claims court lacks personal and subject matter jurisdiction because it's a trust matter — BS (10/100)
Sovereign citizen 'trust matter' line is the same script judges hear every week — courts reject it every time.
Claims police and towing company acted under 'color of law' so jurisdiction doesn't apply — BS (5/100)
'Color of law' claims don't erase jurisdiction — they just get you laughed out of federal court too.
Claims Michigan is a fictitious entity with no injured party so no crime occurred — BS (0/100)
Michigan being 'fictitious' is peak sovereign nonsense — the state has locked up plenty of people who tried this.
Claims court has no jurisdiction because it's 'trust property' — BS (10/100)
Sovereign citizen 'trust property' argument gets zero traction in any real court — pure fantasy.
Offers 'certificate of security' to settle charges — Dubious (50/100)
Dug deeper — the evidence is genuinely split here.
Sources: Online Privacy and Security Certification Service Settles FTC Charges | Federal Trade Commission
Judge explains no probable cause hearing yet — next stage — Verified (95/100)
Judge correctly lays out the actual process. Rare to see someone this patient with the nonsense.
Insists 'demir' and standing mute are different and judge has no degree — BS (5/100)
Telling a sitting judge they have 'no legal degree' while mangling basic procedure — peak sovereign citizen energy.
Prosecution must prove both a crime and an injured party — BS (15/100)
That's the classic sovereign-citizen script — courts don't require an 'injured party' for criminal cases.
Defendant accuses judge of bias for denying extra week — Opinion (30/100)
Calling routine scheduling 'bias' after rambling through the hearing — classic sovereign move.
Claims to be executive of a trust and estate owner, not the individual charged — BS (15/100)
Straight out of the sovereign citizen script — rebrand yourself as a trust to dodge jurisdiction.
Cites UN and American declarations on indigenous rights to claim exemption — BS (15/100)
Those declarations don't give individuals immunity from criminal court jurisdiction
Claims court lacks jurisdiction because he is indigenous — BS (15/100)
Sovereign citizen 'indigenous lands' dodge — Michigan courts still run on Michigan law, not vibes.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →