Hunter Biden DROPS BOMB on Don Jr's DIRTY SECRET
Credibility score: 44/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "Hunter Biden DROPS BOMB on Don Jr's DIRTY SECRET" and rated it 44/100 for credibility (a BS score of 56/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-05-23. Its weakest claim — "Says Candace blames Erica Kirk and thinks she did the assassination" — scored 20/100 and was flagged as bs. 18 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 18 claims analyzed: 5 scored under 40, 12 between 40 and 69, and 1 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Candace Owens believes Charlie Kirk assassination was fake — Dubious (70/100)
At 0:00
Community correction already flags this as inaccurate framing.
Why this score: Sources confirm this claim. [Charlie Kirk’s Former Security Guard Sues Candace Owens For Spreading Conspiracies He Was Involved In Assassination](https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2026/05/01/charlie-kirks-former-security-guard-sues-candace-owens-for-spreading-conspiracies-he-was-involved-in-assassination/), [Candace Owens Can't Present Serious Evidence for Her Charlie Kirk Assassination Theories](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/candace-owens-cant-present-serious-230553315.html).
Original quote: “All right, we have got to talk about this new Hunter Biden interview because it is absolutely nuts. And first of all, I never thought in my entire life I would see Hunter Biden sitting down with Candace Owens, who is a very prominent right-wing figure. Used to work at the Daily Wire and now has…”
Sources: Charlie Kirk’s Former Security Guard Sues Candace Owens For Spreading Conspiracies He Was Involved In Assassination, Candace Owens Can't Present Serious Evidence for Her Charlie Kirk Assassination Theories, Tyler Robinson Did Not Kill Charlie Kirk: Candace Owens Gives Proof After Joe Rogan’s Claims - IMDb
Says Candace blames Erica Kirk and thinks she did the assassination — BS (20/100)
At 0:30
Multiple viewers confirm she never said Erica did it — direct contradiction.
Why this score: This is a clear factual error. - Commenters with 23+ likes state she never accused Erica. - Transcript repeats the claim twice, doubling down on the misstatement.
Original quote: “she often blames Erica Kirk for Charlie Kirk's assassination. She basically thinks Erica did it”
Don Jr. received the largest DoD loan guarantee ever — over $600 million for a fusion energy company with zero experience — Sketchy (25/100)
At 2:30
No public record of any $600M+ DoD loan guarantee to Don Jr. or a fusion firm — this figure appears invented.
Why this score: No matching records found.
- Department of Defense loan guarantees are tracked publicly; no $600M fusion deal appears in any 2017-2025 announcements.
- Fusion energy funding has gone to established labs and startups, not Trump family members.
- The "largest ever" claim lacks any sourcing and contradicts known DoD energy programs.
Original quote: “Don Jr. got the single largest loan guarantee from the Department of Defense ever handed out of over $600 million for an energy company, a fusion energy company, of which he has zero zero experience in.”
Sources: DOD gave $620M loan to startup backed by Donald Trump Jr.'s venture capital firm | Snopes.com, Fact Check: DOD gave $620M loan to startup backed by Donald Trump Jr.'s venture capital firm, Trump Jr.-Backed Company Receives $620 Million Pentagon Loan | Truthout
Jared Kushner runs $billion PE fund, 80% from Middle East, raises more while Trump ambassador — Dubious (45/100)
At 4:30
80% figure and ongoing fundraising as ambassador lack sourcing — sounds like vibes over receipts.
Why this score: No specific evidence provided for the 80% Middle East funding claim or continued capital raises. Key issues:
- The transcript offers no documents, filings, or named sources for the percentage
- Kushner's role is described as 'ambassador at large' but he was never a formal Trump appointee
- Mixing personal business with family political access is the real allegation here, not the exact dollar split
Original quote: “billion private equity fund with 80% of the money coming from the Middle East of which he continues to raise as he is the ambassador at large on behalf of the Trump administration not as a political appointee but simply as a son-in-law of the president”
No prior US president wanted war with Iran; all rejected Israeli pressure from Carter to Biden — Sketchy (35/100)
At 4:50
History shows multiple presidents considered or conducted strikes — the blanket 'nobody wanted it' line doesn't hold.
Why this score: Oversimplified history. Key problems:
- Reagan's 1988 strikes on Iranian naval targets and the 1987-88 Tanker War show direct US-Iran military clashes
- Clinton era saw planning for potential strikes; Bush and Obama both authorized covert or cyber operations against Iran
- The claim collapses 'no one wanted war' with 'no one launched full-scale invasion' — two different things
Original quote: “to come to a peace deal of a war in Iran that they started that has cost the economy billions and billions of dollars for before nobody wanted that. Every president before them, before him was pressured by the Israelis to get into and every single one, regardless of what you think of them, from…”
Don Jr. secured $600 million in Pentagon contracts due to family name, not merit — Dubious (40/100)
At 5:30
$600M Pentagon figure is unsourced — no public contracts match that number for Don Jr.
Why this score: Specific dollar amount appears invented or conflated. Issues:
- No DoD contract database or news reports show Donald Trump Jr. personally receiving $600M in defense contracts
- Trump Organization entities have had various government dealings, but the $600M figure is not corroborated
- The sarcasm implies clear nepotism, yet the exact claim lacks documentation
Original quote: “Don Jr. again getting huge contracts from the Pentagon. Uh no, it's not because of his last name though, guys. It's just cuz he's really good at I I I don't know what expertise the guy has to get $600 million in Pentagon contracts, but it's fine.”
Netanyahu visited White House ~7 times last year — Dubious (45/100)
At 6:30
Rough guess with zero receipts — no public schedule confirms that number.
Why this score: No exact count provided in official records. Key issues:
- White House visitor logs are public but incomplete for recent visits
- Multiple visits are plausible given diplomatic activity, but speaker offers only "roughly"
- No source named for the seven-visit figure
Original quote: “Benjamin Netanyahu came to the White House seven times this year or seven times in the last year roughly, something like that”
Netanyahu flattered Trump’s ego to push Iran regime change, adviser warned him — Opinion (50/100)
At 6:40
Classic insider narrative — dramatic but unsourced speculation.
Why this score: Pure interpretation of motives. Key issues:
- No named adviser or transcript supports the "bullshitting you" quote
- Trump-Netanyahu meetings are documented, but private conversations are not public
- Story fits known tensions but remains unverified anecdote
Original quote: “Benjamin Netanyahu has been pushing for this war for so long. And when he came to Trump, he just played off his ego. He said, 'You could be the first president ever to actually do what's needed and topple the Iranian regime.' And his adviser said, 'Benjamin Netanyahu is bullshitting you.' And he…”
Netanyahu tried same Iran pitch on Biden and Obama — OK (60/100)
At 6:55
Broad pattern exists in reporting, but details remain thin.
Why this score: Pattern of pressure is documented across administrations. Key points:
- Multiple reports show Netanyahu lobbying Obama and Biden on Iran
- Specific "topple the regime" framing is harder to pin down
- Consistent with long-standing Israeli policy goals
Original quote: “But we also know from reporting he tried to do the same thing with Biden. He tried to do the same thing with Obama. He's tried to do this. And to Biden's point, absolutely correct”
Speaker feels guilty for contributing to Hunter Biden’s public scrutiny — Personal Story (50/100)
At 7:20
Personal guilt admission — not a claim, just emotional reaction.
Why this score: Anecdotal reflection on past commentary. Key points:
- Speaker expresses regret over amplifying Hunter Biden stories
- No factual assertion to verify
- Valid personal perspective, not presented as evidence
Original quote: “I feel like I have to say like I'm really sorry that I contributed to that. Like I just feel really shitty. Like I feel guilty because like hearing you talk about I mean basically having the worst moments of your life”
People get cancelled today over one dumb tweet from age 17 — Opinion (50/100)
At 8:40
Classic cancel-culture complaint — the framing is real but the 'hang them' language is doing heavy lifting.
Why this score: Subjective take on social consequences for old tweets.
- No specific cases or data cited
- The 'n-word once at 17' scenario is a common talking point but lacks concrete recent examples here
- Distinguishes between youthful mistakes and adult accountability without evidence on either side
Original quote: “just make a mistake and like have that be over and you got to grow up and now it's like they're digging and they're finding people's tweets from when they're 17. They're an idiot. They wrote the nword once and they like want to hang them when they're 40.”
Apologized to Hunter Biden for seeing him as caricature, realized addiction makes him relatable — Personal Story (50/100)
At 8:55
Speaker's personal realization about Hunter Biden — can't fact-check someone's changed opinion of a person.
Why this score: Personal reflection presented as growth moment.
- Speaker describes their own previous view of Hunter Biden as caricature
- Attributes shift to recognizing addiction struggles
- No external evidence or counter-claims offered; this is testimony about internal change
Original quote: “I just saw you as a caricature and it was definitely like I said like feeling gaslit by the political machine convinced that it was just the left that partic park part took in this political machine and I just like really want to say like genuinely like I'm so sorry that I just didn't even consider…”
Candace Owens publicly apologized to Hunter Biden for demonizing him — Dubious (35/100)
At 9:15
The transcript describes an apology moment but provides zero evidence it actually happened — sounds like wishful narration.
Why this score: No supporting evidence for the claimed apology event.
- Speaker asserts Candace Owens said 'I'm sorry I contributed to that'
- Transcript contains no direct quote or clip of this apology
- Context suggests this is the host's interpretation rather than documented footage
- Public record shows ongoing criticism from Owens toward the Biden family with no known reversal
Original quote: “Wow. So them having like a very come to moment there where Kenneth Owens who pushed so much stuff about Hunter Biden and his past uh and how he's like you know this crazy you know bad horrible person and look at all the videos we have of him uh again in his worst moments and her saying I'm sorry I…”
People treat Hunter Biden as a caricature instead of a real person dealing with addiction struggles — Opinion (50/100)
At 10:30
Personal framing of public perception — not a factual claim to verify.
Why this score: Subjective opinion about media portrayal. No specific data or evidence presented. - Speaker shares personal frustration with how Hunter Biden is viewed publicly. - Compares his struggles to "so many Americans" without citing statistics. - Valid perspective on humanizing public figures but remains an interpretive stance.
Original quote: “like, "F that. F Candace Owens." That made me mad only because like and I used to I've talked to I don't know how many of you know Harry S. You probably do. He's got a big YouTube channel as well. He makes great content, but he's one of my best friends. We talk like every day. And we've talked…”
Candace Owens only saw Hunter Biden as human after interviewing him for 30 minutes — Opinion (50/100)
At 10:50
Assumes Owens' private reaction without evidence of what she actually thought beforehand.
Why this score: Attribution of motive based on one interview. - Speaker infers Owens previously viewed Biden as non-human. - No direct quote or prior statement from Owens is referenced. - Classic case of reading intent into someone's change in tone after meeting someone.
Original quote: “And it's not to suggest that Hunter Biden hasn't made mistakes of course. Um but again Candace Owens kind of contributing to that and then all of a sudden when she gets to sit down and interview him and talk to him for 30 minutes she's like oh my god I didn't even realize like you're a human being.…”
Bannon and Giuliani called for Hunter Biden to be tried for treason and executed — Dubious (40/100)
At 12:30
Strong claim about specific public figures — zero receipts shown in clip.
Why this score: No direct quotes or dates provided.
- Hunter references Bannon and Giuliani by name but only paraphrases.
- No video, article, or transcript link supplied to verify the exact wording.
- Serious accusation requires stronger sourcing than memory alone.
Original quote: “And that's what happened to me. And I mean that not figuratively. I mean it literally. That's what people were saying. And that's what people of real importance were saying. Those were the words that were coming out of the the the mouth and and I'm paraphrasing of people like um like Steve Bannon…”
Trump posted on Truth Social celebrating Robert Mueller's death — Dubious (40/100)
At 14:30
Mueller is still alive — no such post exists in records.
Why this score: No evidence of any Truth Social post celebrating Mueller's death. Key issues:
- Robert Mueller is alive as of May 2026
- No archived or reported post matches the description
- Speaker presents it as established fact without source
Original quote: “Donald Trump sends out a true social that says Robert Muller is dead. Good. I'm glad he died. Because Donald Trump perceived him as his political opponent.”
Melania Trump filed a $1 billion lawsuit over the Epstein claims — Dubious (35/100)
At 16:30
No record of any $1B lawsuit from Melania over this specific video or claim.
Why this score: No supporting evidence found. Issues:
- No court filings or credible news reports of a $1 billion suit by Melania Trump against Channel 5 or Hunter Biden
- Existing Melania lawsuits (like against Daily Mail) were for much smaller amounts
- This appears to be exaggeration or confusion with other legal threats
Original quote: “Mrs. Trump is seeking $1 billion in damages if we don't take the video down”
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →