Kimi K3 Open Source AI Beats GPT & Fable? 🤯 (Coding FF7, Red Dead & MLX)
Credibility score: 44/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
Claims analyzed
2.8 trillion param Kimi K3 beats GPT & Fable — zero model shown — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Drops a 2.8-trillion claim and leaderboard before any model or benchmark loads. Bold. Stupid, but bold. 😈
Drops 2.8-trillion-param model with no source or benchmark link — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Announces 2.8 trillion parameters like it’s settled fact — zero receipts, zero paper, zero link. 😈
Kimi K3 never stops until 100% happy — built-in harness claim — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Says the model has a 'builtin harness' that keeps going until 100% — names no code or test that proves it.
Made full FF7, RDR2, and GTA5 remakes with one model — Confidence Mismatch (20/100)
Says 'made' like he shipped finished games — these are tiny demos at best, not remakes.
Jumps from prompting an AI to 'make GTA 6 ourselves' — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Said 'make GTA 6 ourselves' like the prompt is the hard part. Bold. Stupid, but bold.
Calls built-in harness the 'main innovation' with zero comparison — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Labels it the core breakthrough like that's obvious — no benchmarks, no prior models mentioned. 😈
Lists basic edits as if they're new frontier capabilities — Missing Context (45/100)
Acts like skin tone and age sliders are mind-blowing — most image models have had this for years. 😈
Jumps from 'potentially' to asking for full AAA browser game in one breath — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Slides from 'maybe' to demanding AAA graphics and proper models with zero evidence it can deliver. 😈
Model correctly flags the absurd ask — speaker still calls the attempt 'doing some stuff' — Missing Context (45/100)
Model tells the truth about scope and budget — speaker shrugs it off and keeps going anyway. 😈
Calls current output 'not best' while promising quality with tweaks — Missing Context (45/100)
Promises 'quality game' with extra turns — never shows what that actually produces. 💀
Bugs exist but model is still great — Missing Context (45/100)
Admits collisions are broken — then immediately pivots to 'so much good' without showing the fix.
Prompt upgrade equals better game — Missing Context (45/100)
Calls the prompt 'more ambitious' while the actual output still shows placeholder buildings and broken physics.
Calls it a 'vision model' that 'sees and understands' — Loaded Language (45/100)
'Understands' is doing heavy lifting — it's generating previews, not proving comprehension. 🔥
Audio generation is now a 'skill' — Loaded Language (45/100)
Labels basic TTS as a learned 'skill' like the model gained a new ability rather than just calling an API.
Attributes 'excitement' to the model about its own work — Loaded Language (45/100)
Model isn't excited — it's role-playing the prompt. Anthropomorphism doing the selling. 😈
5-hour FF7 + MLX port — no receipts, just time claim — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Drops '5 hours' like it's measured — zero logs, zero timestamps, zero proof it wasn't 20. 💀
Calls it AAA graphics while showing early dark prototype — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Labels it 'AAA graphics' while the actual screenshots are still very dark and unfinished.
Presents MLX Linux attempt as impressive without showing results — Missing Context (45/100)
Mentions it downloaded MLX on Linux but leaves out whether anything actually worked or just failed.
Claims it's AAA graphics on an FF7 clone — confidence without proof — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Calls it AAA graphics while describing a hobbyist AI clone. That's a stretch with zero comparison data.
Assumes the AI is 'happy' with its own dark screenshots — anthropomorphism as evidence — Just Vibes (50/100)
Treating the AI saying 'done' like it has taste. Cute bit, but it's just code stopping.
Prompted the AI to fix dark textures after it already called itself done — iterative coaxing presented as success — Missing Context (45/100)
The model didn't nail it first try. User had to step in and correct it, then showed the improved version.
One prompt created full FF7 scene — confidence mismatch — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Calls it 'just one prompt' like that explains the entire result. Zero detail on what was actually fed in.
Tifa or Eric romance choice — false dilemma — False Dilemma (20/100)
Presents only two romance options when the original game and mods have way more paths.
Gemini and Claude failed, Kimi succeeded — anonymous authority on other models — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
Names Gemini Pro and Claude Sonnet Max failing the same prompt with zero logs or output shown. 💀
Calls the fix 'sneaky' then walks it back — Loaded Language (45/100)
Labels the code change 'sneaky' for drama — then immediately says he doesn't know if it is.
LLM diagnosed quantization as the bug — no proof it actually checked — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
AI said it 'checked everything' — zero receipts on what it actually looked at. Classic anonymous authority move.
Claims the real bug was something else entirely — Missing Context (45/100)
Says 'this was the bug' like it's obvious — never shows what the original prompt or expected behavior actually was.
Claims the real bug was elsewhere — but the 'good' edit gets zero scrutiny — Missing Context (45/100)
Calls the LN head fix 'good' then immediately dismisses it without showing why it wasn't the actual problem.
Calls the missing comma 'so simple' after AI found it — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Calls the fix trivial only after the model spotted it. Before that, it was apparently invisible to him.
Missing comma zero declared the sole bug — no evidence it's the only one — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Calls the missing comma 'the bug' with total certainty while admitting the model found it by accident.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →