The cinnabon incident.. (it got worse)
Credibility score: 49/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "The cinnabon incident.. (it got worse)" and rated it 49/100 for credibility (a BS score of 51/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-15. Its weakest claim — "Employee fundraising by blaming Trump for the incident" — scored 35/100 and was flagged as dubious. 18 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Internet freaks out when people don't fit in neat boxes — Opinion (50/100)
Classic 'both sides are crazy' take — zero new info, just vibes.
Employees can't shout racial slurs at customers — Opinion (50/100)
Basic employment rule, not controversial.
Viral clip hit 11 million views in 48 hours — Unverifiable (50/100)
No public view-count data backs the exact number.
Cinnabon fired the worker right away — Verified (85/100)
Cinnabon confirmed the franchise fired her immediately.
The couple has a history of lying about incidents — Dubious (40/100)
No evidence presented for their supposed lying history.
The couple lied to frame the employee — Opinion (50/100)
Strong motive claim without evidence they fabricated anything.
Muslims and other religious people want to impose their religion as law — Opinion (50/100)
Broad brush on 'tons of people' pushing religious law — no specific groups or evidence named.
Employee mocked customer's hijab, leaving couple traumatized and anxious — Dubious (40/100)
Story escalated from extra caramel to full-on religious attack with zero footage shown
Calls both sides racist in the Cinnabon argument — Opinion (50/100)
Calling the whole thing mutual racism — skips who started filming and who got fired.
Employee fundraising by blaming Trump for the incident — Dubious (35/100)
Fundraising off 'Trump did this' while comments say the couple had been harassing her all day.
Labels the couple and their brother as 'retards' — Opinion (50/100)
Just name-calling the other side — zero facts, pure heat.
Media misrepresents facts dishonestly to manipulate viewers — Opinion (50/100)
Broad accusation of systemic dishonesty with zero examples named.
Media misrepresented Cinnabon incident by omitting how conflict started — OK (60/100)
Community notes and bodycam footage suggest the couple antagonized the worker earlier.
Media is deliberately lying to manipulate the audience — Opinion (50/100)
Returns to blanket accusation without new evidence.
Cinnabon worker fundraising by blaming Trump for her rant — Dubious (45/100)
No evidence links the employee's meltdown to Trump policy — just same ethnicity as the customers.
Claims 109 countries expelled Jews and Holocaust deniers use 271k death toll — Dubious (45/100)
The 109 figure is a recycled antisemitic meme, not a documented historical count.
Predicts both sides will profit from crowdfunding after the incident — Dubious (40/100)
Calls it a moneymaker for 'both sides' — community notes only show the worker got ~$100K, nothing for the couple.
Racists have a legal right to be ignorant — Opinion (50/100)
Framing ignorance as a protected right — technically true but weirdly generous to bigotry.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →