It just keeps getting worse..
Credibility score: 36/100 — Low Credibility. High BS alert! Many claims lack evidence or are misleading.
BSmeter analyzed "It just keeps getting worse.." and rated it 36/100 for credibility (a BS score of 64/100 — low credibility), on 2026-07-06. Its weakest claim — "Comparing US democracy to countries with political prisoners, like it's all the same vibe. 🤡" — scored 20/100 and was flagged as false equivalence. 14 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Sets up the video with emotionally charged language and specific, unverified details about the incident. — Loaded Language (45/100)
Starts with 'absolutely horrific footage' and 'severely beaten' before showing anything. The emotional buttons are already pressed. 🚨
Describing the violence as 'literally punching her in the face' and 'literally hitting her' — Loaded Language (45/100)
Using 'literally' twice to describe the obvious violence, as if we needed confirmation it wasn't a metaphor. We see it, chief. 🥊
Asks 'Where's the guns at?' implying a need for lethal force. — Emotional Button (45/100)
The 'where's the guns at?' is a classic emotional appeal to escalate the situation, tapping into fear and a desire for extreme intervention. 🚨
Setting the scene with a dramatic, unverified claim about business shutdowns. — Missing Context (45/100)
They're just dropping 'businesses shut down' like it's a fact, but for what reason? And when? Zero details. 🚩
Dismisses 'just like Iran' comparison while advocating for authoritarian measures. 🚩 — Volume Game (45/100)
Says 'not just like Iran' right after suggesting shock collars and forced labor. The self-awareness is... optional. 😬
Comparing US democracy to countries with political prisoners, like it's all the same vibe. 🤡 — False Equivalence (20/100)
Lumping the US with countries that jail political opponents is a wild leap — not all 'issues' are equal. 🚩
Speaker says they'd only do 'teen takeovers' if they knew they'd get away with it, implying harsh punishment is the only deterrent. — False Dilemma (20/100)
Suggests the only two options are 'get away with it' or 'shock collar/prison/shot.' Like there's no in-between for consequences. 🤡
Labels people as 'second generation Moroccan migrants' before showing video of alleged attacks. 🚩 — Loaded Language (45/100)
Immediately labels the group by ethnicity and migrant status before showing the video. Setting the stage with loaded terms, much? 🙄
Expressing relief and demanding more action against 'these people' — Emotional Button (45/100)
The 'thank god' and 'got to go after these people more' is pure emotional rallying, not a policy proposal 🙄
Connects modern 'caveman' behavior to natural selection 7,000 years ago. — False Equivalence (20/100)
Jumps from 'we're all cavemen at heart' to 'natural selection 7,000 years ago' like it's the same thing. That's a leap, not a bridge. 🤦♂️
Argues against 'random women' in police force, preferring 'Amazonian goddesses'. — Straw Man (20/100)
Sets up a false choice: 'random women' vs. 'Amazonian goddesses' for police. As if those are the only two options 🙄
Dismissing women police officers based on height and weight, using a fictional character as the 'ideal' 🤡 — False Equivalence (20/100)
Comparing real police officers to Brienne of Tarth is like comparing a house cat to a tiger — one's a fictional warrior, the other's a job 🙄
Claiming Ronnie Coleman has more Mr. Olympia wins than anyone, then hedging immediately. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Starts with 'I think he has' then 'I'm pretty sure he has' — the confidence is doing more heavy lifting than the actual knowledge. 🏋️♂️
Calling 'team takeovers' embarrassing with strong language. — Loaded Language (45/100)
Using 'so fucking embarrassing' to describe 'team takeovers' — strong emotional language to drive a point, not just state it. 😬
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →