It's so much worse than we thought..
Credibility score: 38/100 — Low Credibility. High BS alert! Many claims lack evidence or are misleading.
BSmeter analyzed "It's so much worse than we thought.." and rated it 38/100 for credibility (a BS score of 62/100 — low credibility), on 2026-07-01. Its weakest claim — "Claim: Police inaction is due to fear of being labeled racist, leading to 'two-tier policing.'" — scored 20/100 and was flagged as straw man. 3 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 3 claims analyzed: 1 scored under 40, 2 between 40 and 69, and 0 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Video opens with a highlight reel preview of a controversial police body cam incident. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 0:00
This intro is dropping a whole movie plot in 25 seconds — setting the stage for some serious drama. 🍿
Why this score: The video starts with a rapid-fire summary of a disturbing event, complete with dates, names, and accusations. It's a classic highlight reel to hook the viewer, not a claim to be fact-checked, but it's definitely setting an emotional tone.
Original quote: “The released additional body cam from Henry Noak case. Newly released police body cam from December 3rd, 2025 shows Vic from Digua murdering 18-year-old student Henry Noak falsely claiming Noak assaulted him and racially knocked off his turban. Officers responded sympathetically to Digua,…”
Claims the other person was 'obviously drunk' and escalated the situation. — Loaded Language (45/100)
At 0:30
Calling someone 'obviously drunk' and 'escalating' sets a clear narrative without needing proof. Convenient, isn't it? 🙄
Why this score: The speaker uses descriptive, judgmental language ('obviously drunk,' 'escalating the situation') to characterize the other person's behavior. This frames the narrative in a way that places blame and justifies his own actions without presenting objective evidence of the other person's intoxication or intent to escalate.
Original quote: “He was stumbling around literally I saw him from there from the getgo from there I saw look mate you clearly are obviously drunk. I said to him carry on with your day he said that and then he started just escalating the situation call me and all this sort of stuff.”
Claim: Police inaction is due to fear of being labeled racist, leading to 'two-tier policing.' — Straw Man (20/100)
At 2:30
Jumping from 'not handcuffing' to 'fear of being called racist' is a massive leap. It's creating an argument that wasn't there. 🤡
Why this score: The speaker introduces the idea that police are afraid of being labeled 'racist' as the reason for their alleged inaction, which is a speculative and unproven assertion. This sets up a straw man argument, attributing a motive to the police that hasn't been established, then attacking that fabricated motive to support the 'two-tier policing' claim.
Original quote: “Well, no. You can't say that they might stab you because if you do that, that would be racist. Such a different interaction. Two-tier policing is clear as daylight.”
See the full analysis with timestamps →