All the footage is released!
Credibility score: 49/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "All the footage is released!" and rated it 49/100 for credibility (a BS score of 51/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-09. Its weakest claim — "Repeatedly calls the court papers fake while refusing service" — scored 15/100 and was flagged as bs. 21 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Hacker released unredacted police footage of his case — Personal Story (50/100)
Personal account of leaked footage — no way to verify the hack itself yet.
First two days of footage missing; only final two days recovered — Personal Story (50/100)
Claims the heroin accusation days are gone — we'll see if the recovered footage shows anything useful.
Repeatedly calls the court papers fake while refusing service — BS (15/100)
Officer later confirms with the court they're real — he knew they weren't fake.
Says police can legally serve papers by just saying the words without handing them over — Dubious (45/100)
Utah service rules require actual delivery or leaving the documents — just yelling the phrase isn't enough.
Calling police with false threat to get someone arrested is super duper illegal — Verified (85/100)
Filing a false police report is literally a crime — that part's correct.
He called the store a billion times and threatened employees — Sketchy (30/100)
"A billion times" is doing heavy lifting — probably means "multiple".
They printed up fake lawsuit papers to serve him — Dubious (40/100)
Commenters note the officer later confirmed the papers were real after checking with the court.
Ready to arrest them under Utah cyberbullying and digital stalking statutes — OK (55/100)
Utah does have cyberstalking laws — whether the facts meet the threshold is the real question.
Utah lets anyone 18+ serve papers if not involved in case and not an attorney — OK (60/100)
Age and non-affiliation rules sound right but Utah actually requires registration or court appointment in many districts.
Random woman he met 10 minutes ago is now a valid Utah process server — Dubious (45/100)
Meeting someone ten minutes earlier doesn't prove she's registered or court-approved in that jurisdiction.
Only way she's impersonating is if she's under 18 — ID check rules that out — Dubious (40/100)
Impersonation isn't limited to age — using an unregistered server can still count as impersonation in some jurisdictions.
Claims impersonating a process server is a class A misdemeanor in Utah — Unverifiable (50/100)
Sounds plausible but no Utah statute cited — just stated like it's settled law.
Claims Aean committed obstruction by lying to police — Dubious (40/100)
Calling it obstruction while the footage is still rolling — that's a legal conclusion, not a fact yet.
Accuses someone of forging a contract and threatening to kill her — Unverifiable (50/100)
Heavy accusations dropped with zero evidence shown on camera.
Court confirms the case is real and valid — Solid (75/100)
Court clerk just verified the case exists — directly contradicts the "fake papers" claim.
Cops muted bodycam to hide conversation — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it deliberate hiding assumes motive we can't confirm from the clip.
Cops knew case was weak but arrested anyway — Opinion (50/100)
The line is the narrator's interpretation, not a direct quote from officers.
Must arrest for cyberstalking/bullying to send message — Opinion (50/100)
This is the officer stating a desired outcome, not confirming charges exist.
House raided over Lego theft accusation — Personal Story (50/100)
Personal account of events; no independent verification offered in this segment.
Everyone's facing felonies in the Lego case — Dubious (45/100)
Police say felonies on tape, but the $200k theft angle is still just their framing — not proven in court yet.
Says Bricks & Minifigs is filing fake threats in his name causing multi-state police hunt — Dubious (45/100)
Serious accusation — no evidence shown beyond the police call itself.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →