Voicemail Transcriptions still don't work
Credibility score: 59/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "Voicemail Transcriptions still don't work" and rated it 59/100 for credibility (a BS score of 41/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-29. Its weakest claim — "Speaker highlights the absurdity of the transcription errors, specifically "fart Sunday."" — scored 45/100 and was flagged as loaded language. 11 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 11 claims analyzed: 0 scored under 40, 6 between 40 and 69, and 5 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Speaker shares a voicemail transcription that is clearly garbled and unhelpful. — No Frame (75/100)
At 0:00
Sharing a direct, unedited example of a bad transcription — it's a straightforward demonstration of the problem.
Why this score: The speaker is showing, not just telling, the issue with voicemail transcriptions by presenting a real-world, clearly flawed example from their own phone. This is clean framing because it allows the viewer to judge the quality directly.
Original quote: “Fairly certain that this transcription was not useful. It's a voicemail from Mom. "Just a few more hours and you can take the hospital and put it to the side for a week. Have a good and special week."”
Speaker highlights the absurdity of the transcription errors, specifically "fart Sunday." — Loaded Language (45/100)
At 0:11
Using "fart Sunday" to emphasize the transcription's failure — it's a humorous, but loaded, way to underscore the point.
Why this score: By quoting the most ridiculous part of the transcription, 'fart Sunday,' the speaker is using humor and a slightly exaggerated focus to highlight the poor quality. While funny and effective, it's a loaded choice designed to elicit a specific reaction (laughter, agreement that it's bad) rather than a neutral presentation of the error.
Original quote: “Mom's a giant as well as like a fart Sunday. "I love you. Bye." Thanks, iPhone.”
Explaining voicemail transcription with absurd, attention-grabbing examples. — Loaded Language (45/100)
At 0:30
Uses exaggerated and bizarre examples to illustrate a simple concept, making it more memorable but also a bit distracting. — The 'foreskin' example is definitely a choice for shock value.
Why this score: The speaker is using hyperbole and shock humor to frame the basic function of voicemail transcription. While the core idea is simple (transcribing voicemails), the examples are designed to be so outlandish that they grab attention and create a specific, comedic tone. This isn't about accuracy, but about entertainment and engagement through absurdity. It's a classic comedic framing technique.
Original quote: “NO, this is when someone leaves you a voicemail and to save you time having to listen to it, your phone informs you the message goes, "Oh, hi. This is Bon Jovi calling or for an ADHD assessment." You go to Goblin Girls Group or your mechanic calling to let you know, "Yeah, we got your foreskin…”
The request for another voicemail transcription video — setting up the segment's purpose. — No Frame (75/100)
At 2:30
Just a straightforward request, setting the stage for the content to follow.
Why this score: This is a direct request from one speaker to another, which serves as an introduction to the main topic of the video: showcasing more bad voicemail transcriptions. It's a clear, neutral setup.
Original quote: “Mark, please make another voicemail transcription.”
Voicemail transcriptions are hilariously bad, turning medical calls into absurdities. — No Frame (75/100)
At 4:30
Sharing multiple examples of bizarre voicemail transcription errors to highlight a common tech frustration. — It's a relatable, humorous observation.
Why this score: The speaker is using a series of anecdotal examples to illustrate a point about the poor quality of voicemail transcription technology. This isn't a claim to be fact-checked, but rather a shared experience that many can relate to. The humor comes from the absurd misinterpretations, like 'weasel up your' instead of 'nasal up your' or 'you have sex' from CVS Pharmacy. It's a straightforward presentation of a common tech glitch.
Original quote: “GP told me to get a colonoscopy. I found the follow-up call voicemail transcription to be a little insensitive. Hello, it's calling to check on you after we put in a weasel up your Hello, hello. This is CVS Pharmacy calling to inform you that you have sex. Hey, just wanted to let you know that your…”
Showcasing bizarre and nonsensical voicemail transcriptions as evidence of failure. — Cherry-Picked (45/100)
At 6:30
They're highlighting the absolute worst examples to prove their point. It's funny, but not necessarily representative of all transcriptions.
Why this score: The video is using extreme, often hilarious, examples of transcription failures ('Ninja Turtles morning shoes', 'Chavacano one', 'one second as the 12th') to illustrate its point that 'voicemail transcription sucks'. While these examples are real and demonstrate flaws, they are likely cherry-picked for maximum comedic and illustrative effect. A more neutral framing would acknowledge that some transcriptions are accurate, but the video focuses solely on the errors to build its case.
Original quote: “Oh, Ninja Turtles morning shoes. I'm losing [clears throat] my mind. My phone's voicemail transcribed have a good one as Chavacano one. Me when I'm a Sim. In regards to Did this voicemail transcription seriously just write out one second as the 12th and iPhone transcription for a spam voicemail…”
Voicemail transcription turns 'check-up call' into 'very quick testicle'. — Loaded Language (45/100)
At 8:30
The transcription error is so wildly off, it creates a completely different, very awkward meaning. Classic transcription fail.
Why this score: This is a prime example of how a single word error can completely change the meaning and tone of a message. The original intent was likely 'check-up call' or 'test call,' but 'testicle' introduces highly inappropriate and unintended 'loaded language' due to the transcription's failure. It's not the speaker's loaded language, but the system's.
Original quote: “>> Good afternoon, my name is Edith and I'm calling from Wellington smile the dentist. It was just a a very quick testicle.”
Voicemail transcription errors are hilariously bad, like 'I crime.' — No Frame (75/100)
At 10:30
They're just showing examples of bad transcriptions, no real framing here beyond the obvious humor.
Why this score: The speaker is simply presenting examples of poorly transcribed voicemails, highlighting the humor and absurdity of the errors. There's no hidden agenda or manipulative language; it's a straightforward demonstration of a common tech problem.
Original quote: “to reach out to you a couple times in regards to Oh, Mr. Cool. Yes, hello. I crime. Well, at least they're honest.”
Presenting multiple examples of hilariously bad voicemail transcriptions. — Highlighting AI's absurd errors for comedic effect. — Loaded Language (45/100)
At 12:30
Using specific, often vulgar, transcription errors to emphasize the 'badness' of AI. It's funny, but it's also cherry-picking the worst examples.
Why this score: The speaker is using a series of highly specific, often crude, and clearly incorrect voicemail transcriptions to frame AI transcription as universally terrible and unreliable. While these examples are likely real and genuinely funny, they are cherry-picked to maximize comedic impact and reinforce the idea that 'voicemail transcriptions still don't work' rather than providing a balanced view of AI transcription capabilities. The 'Show me you cocaine' and 'Hope your dick was good' examples are particularly effective at creating a strong, negative impression of the technology.
Original quote: “Show me you cocaine. Bye. Voicemail transcription in the mail. Hi, this is grandma. I talked to your mom tonight. She said you're going to be a badass man for your friend's wedding. Voicemail transcription from my mom. Hi, honey. It's me. I'm in the country. I am paranormal. 4-minute voicemail from…”
A rapid-fire montage of humorous and poetic definitions of 'the sky' from the community. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 12:30
This whole segment is a fun, creative interlude, showcasing community responses to a quirky prompt. No claims to fact-check here, just good vibes.
Why this score: The speaker asked his community to define 'the sky' in nine words, and this is a compilation of those responses. It's a lighthearted, creative segment designed for entertainment and audience engagement, not to make factual assertions. It sets a playful tone before diving into the main topic of voicemail transcription fails.
Original quote: “What is the sky? Haven't called him back, so I'm not sure why I know the answer. Well, I can help you there, mate. I asked my community to answer that question in exactly nine words though as a throwback to my 2021 magnet video. The sky is a blanket protecting against deadly lasers. The shell of…”
Speaker shares a humorous, slightly off voicemail transcription — highlighting the tech's imperfection. — No Frame (75/100)
At 14:30
They're just sharing a funny personal anecdote to illustrate a point about tech limitations. No hidden agenda here.
Why this score: This is a straightforward, personal story used to demonstrate the ongoing issues with voicemail transcription. It's not trying to mislead or manipulate; it's just a relatable example of a common tech frustration. The humor makes it land well without needing extra context.
Original quote: “voicemail message at five stars. No notes. Yeah, just checking up on you guys. [ __ ] you. Bye. Just received a voicemail transcription that ended with, "So, hopefully everything works out. Well, talk to you soon. Bye gnome.”
See the full analysis with timestamps →