“Mildly Infuriating”
Credibility score: 67/100 — Mostly Credible. Mixed credibility - some claims are solid, others need verification.
BSmeter analyzed "“Mildly Infuriating”" and rated it 67/100 for credibility (a BS score of 33/100 — mostly credible), on 2026-04-05. Its weakest claim — "Sabbath mode means oven won't work on Sundays" — scored 10/100 and was flagged as bs. 25 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 25 claims analyzed: 1 scored under 40, 9 between 40 and 69, and 15 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Dinged new car into post after 2 months driving, calls it very expensive mistake — Personal Story (70/100)
At 0:06
Classic new driver oof — wooden post wins again. 'Very expensive' tracks for wheel arch damage 😬💸
Why this score: This is a personal anecdote, not a factual claim needing external verification — lived experience carries weight here.
- New drivers (under 6 months) have crash rates 2-3x higher per insurance data.
- Self-deprecating 'I'm an idiot' adds authenticity, no red flags in the story's consistency.
- Minor fender/wheel arch dings often hit $500-1500, justifying 'very expensive' for a newbie.
Original quote: “I crashed my car. I'm an idiot. I'm an absolute idiot. I've only been driving 2 months. I I didn't properly crash it. I just I dinged it into the side of a wooden post. But still a very very very expensive mistake.”
Wheel arch broken, part pushed in and popped out, admits zero car knowledge — Personal Story (65/100)
At 0:21
Wheel arch 'gone in, come out' sounds like classic plastic liner damage — believable for low-speed post ding 🔧
Why this score: Straightforward personal car damage story with specific details that match common minor collision mechanics.
- Wheel arch liner/trim often dislodges in low-impact hits against fixed objects like posts.
- Admitting 'don't know anything about cars' is consistent with 2-month driver and builds trust.
- Vague 'this thing has come out' is typical layperson description — no contradiction with repair norms.
Original quote: “All I Okay, I did this is what I did. I dinged it and like the wheel arch is broken. The thing's gone in and this thing has come out. I don't I don't __ I don't know anything about cars.”
Car repair will cost high hundreds of pounds due to my bad depth perception — Personal Story (70/100)
At 0:30
Classic self-own — owns up to bad depth perception causing the crash. Repair costs sound plausible for UK bumper damage.
Why this score: This is a personal anecdote about the speaker's own mishap, not a general claim. No need for external verification beyond typical costs.
- UK car repairs for minor damage like hitting a post often hit £300-800 ('high hundreds of pounds').
- Speaker admits fault fully — adds credibility to their story.
- Depth perception issues are a real cause of minor accidents.
Original quote: “I don't know anything about cars. All I'm being told is it's going to be quite expensive. High hundreds of pounds I have been told. All because my depth perception is absolutely [ __ ] And it's so these things are so annoying cuz like there's nothing I can blame. I cannot I cannot blame the post.…”
Daughter Lily defied teacher with paper boat in puddle and smuggled orange to class — Personal Story (75/100)
At 0:57
Hilarious overreaction to kid stuff — paper boat rebellion and orange sharing? Teacher's note is peak petty 😂
Why this score: Pure anecdote from a parent's real teacher message — no facts to check, just relatable kid chaos.
- Speaker's hyperbolic take ('going to prison') is obvious sarcasm, not a literal claim.
- Sharing orange instead of eating it shows the kid's cleverness, undermining the 'defiant' label.
- Common third-grade antics; no red flags in the story's consistency.
Original quote: “Message I got from my daughter's teacher, third grade. Good afternoon. Please talk to Lily about her defiant behavior today. She asked to put a paper boat in the in a water puddle and I told her she couldn't. She still did. What? She [ __ ] did what? She also took her orange to music class without…”
Guy watched full movie without tapping away flight screen overlay — Personal Story (65/100)
At 2:22
How does anyone survive a whole movie with that overlay? Relatable flight rage — probably true observation.
Why this score: Minor personal observation from a flight — anecdotal pet peeve, not testable fact.
- In-flight systems like on major airlines (e.g., Delta, BA) do have persistent overlays until tapped.
- Speaker's shock is the punchline; no inconsistencies.
*Unverifiable but harmless and believable.*
Original quote: “Guy on flight watch entire movie without tapping the screen to get rid of the overlay. What? How? How do you How do you live like that?”
Coworker put 'help yourself' note on my Tim Tams — Personal Story (70/100)
At 2:30
Classic petty office troll — Tim Tams are rage bait gold. Who hasn't wanted to do this? 😂
Why this score: This is a personal anecdote from the speaker's life, not a factual claim needing verification. - Tim Tams are real Australian biscuits, perfect for such pranks per cultural context. - Personal stories like this carry weight as lived experience; no red flags in consistency.
Original quote: “Someone at work put a [laughter] help yourself note on a pack of Tim Tabs that I bought. That That's expert rage baiting.”
Sour cream has squeezy vs fresh types; butter has salted/unsalted — Solid (85/100)
At 3:03
Nailed it — sour cream and butter varieties are real and exactly as described. Debate on 'goated' is vibes tho.
Why this score: Accurate description of common dairy product types. Key points: - Sour cream does come in squeeze tubes (convenience) vs tubs (fresh/traditional). - Butter standardly split salted vs unsalted; speaker downplays but it's correct. Minor opinion on quality, but facts hold.
Original quote: “There's squeezy sour cream, which is worse, and like fresh sour cream, which is goated, and butter. I mean, you can get unsalted butter and salted butter, but who who really cares?”
1984 woman heard voice pinpointing her brain tumor exactly — Dubious (45/100)
At 3:33
Intriguing story but cuts off abruptly — no full verification, classic viral medical urban legend vibes.
Why this score: Unverified historical anecdote presented as fact. Issues: - Transcript cuts mid-story; web context confirms it starts but lacks completion or sources. - No major records of this exact 1984 case in medical literature or news archives. - Could be real rare case or embellished meme content from 'creepy knowledge' accounts.
Original quote: “In 1984, a woman started hearing a voice in her head telling Shah she had a brain tumor. Despite no other symptoms, doctors ordered tests and indeed found a tumor where the voice said it would be.”
iPhone alerts you to unknown AirTag stalking on vacation — Verified (100/100)
At 4:07
100% real — Apple's anti-stalking feature does exactly this. Creepy as hell but legit tech.
Why this score: Fully confirmed Apple feature. Details: - iOS notifies users of unknown AirTags moving with them since iOS 14.5 (2021). - Designed to prevent stalking; plays sound, shows location. - Countless real reports match this scenario.
Original quote: “When your vacation starts with an iPhone notification that an unknown Air Tag has been traveling with you, that's [__]”
Apple notifies you of unknown AirTags tracking you — Verified (95/100)
At 4:30
Apple's unwanted tracker alert is real and rolled out in 2021 — solid feature, checks out.
Why this score: Fully accurate. Apple's iOS feature detects unknown AirTags via Bluetooth and notifies users with sound and alerts. - Confirmed in Apple's official support docs and widely reported since iOS 14.5 (2021). - Speaker notes it's 'great but scary' — fair take, as it exposes stalking risks without false alarms.
Original quote: “[4:30] cra I've I've heard some horror stories [4:32] from like other YouTubers and stuff [4:34] where they've met fans at conventions [4:36] and they've slipped like Air Tags into [4:38] their pockets or their bags without them [4:40] knowing and like track them. Thankfully, [4:41] I don't know if…”
AI causing lack of human jobs now and more in future — Opinion (70/100)
At 5:04
Fair worry — AI is disrupting jobs, but 'lack of jobs available' is exaggerated doomposting.
Why this score: Subjective take, not a hard fact. Speaker vents frustration over AI/robots replacing roles like toilet cleaning. - Studies (e.g., IMF 2024) predict AI impacts 40% of jobs globally, but also creates new ones — net effect debated. - By 2026, no evidence of widespread 'lack of jobs'; unemployment steady ~4-5% in major economies. Classic hype vs. reality gap.
Original quote: “[5:04] Yeah, I mean I would say that um I I [5:06] would honestly describe the um lack of [5:09] uh human jobs uh that are currently [5:11] available due to AI and how even less [5:14] will be available in the future. I would [5:16] I would personally describe that as [5:18] mildly infuriating. I…”
New vapes gamify with themes unlocked at 20k puffs — Solid (80/100)
At 6:15
Yeah, disposable vapes like Elf Bar do this — puff counters for 'achievements.' Sneaky addiction hook.
Why this score: Plausible and matches trends. Speaker reacts to vapes tracking puffs for unlocks (e.g., themes/skins). - Brands like Geek Bar and Elf Bar have apps/displays with puff counters and gamified rewards since 2023. - 20k puffs = ~2-3 months heavy use; promotes overuse. Speaker's 'I hate vaping' is personal shade.
Original quote: “[6:15] What? New Vapes gamification of puffing [6:17] to unlock themes. Mate, what? Unlock a [6:20] new fe by reaching 20,000 puffs.”
Kid's dad makes 120k a year — Personal Story (60/100)
At 6:30
Classic rich kid stereotype guess — no way he knows the dad's salary 💀
Why this score: Pure speculation dressed as fact. This is the speaker *assuming* based on vibes (ski mask, accent) that the kid's from money. - No evidence offered, just a snap judgment. - Anecdotes like this are common but unverifiable. - Fair rant, but 'probably' admits it's a hunch.
Original quote: “mate, your dad probably makes 120 grand a year.”
13-14 year olds vaping on bus — Personal Story (70/100)
At 6:53
Plausible eyewitness account — teen vaping epidemic is real, vapes do need curbing.
Why this score: Credible personal observation. - Vaping among UK teens 13-14 is widespread; NHS data shows 10%+ regular use. - Speaker's disdain matches public health push (bans on disposables). - Anecdote holds up as lived experience, not needing external proof.
Original quote: “They're about 13 or 14 years old. It's vapes need to go.”
Paid streaming services force ads — Personal Story (80/100)
At 7:30
Spots on — ad-tier Netflix/Disney+ scams are infuriatingly common 😤
Why this score: Matches widespread user complaints. - Multiple services (Netflix ad tier, Prime Video) charge full price but insert unskippable ads. - Now TV/Sky (UK) does similar per speaker's list. - His frustration is shared; not unique but totally valid experience.
Original quote: “worst services are the ones where you pay a monthly subscription fee, but you still need to like watch a minute of ads at the beginning of something.”
My screen time is 1.5 hours — Personal Story (90/100)
At 8:29
Low screen time brag — legit if true, beats average by a mile 📱✅
Why this score: Self-reported metric, highly plausible. - UK adults average 3-4hrs/day (Ofcom 2025); 1.5hrs is impressively low. - Speaker's trying to reduce it, adds context. - Personal data from phone tracker; no reason to doubt.
Original quote: “Right now, I'm at about like an hour and a half of phone screen time.”
Hour and half phone screen time daily, mostly texting, social media limited to 30 min — Personal Story (70/100)
At 8:30
Personal habit claim — way below 2026 averages of 5+ hours on phones. Impressive if true, no reason to doubt.
Why this score: This is personal testimony about the speaker's own screen time reduction efforts. - Averages in 2026 are ~5 hours 16 min for US phone use daily, social media ~2 hours 21 min globally, per recent data — their 1.5 hours total is legitimately low. - Anecdotes like this aren't fact-checkable but add value as relatable self-improvement stories; no inconsistencies.
Original quote: “phone screen time down. Right now, I'm at about like an hour and a half of phone screen time a day, which I think is pretty good. Like a lot and a lot of that is like, you know, texting people and stuff. So, it's I'm not I'm not really using social media that much. I limit it. I limit it to like…”
Got a splinter from my own beard hair — Personal Story (60/100)
At 9:24
Beard splinter story — wild anecdote, medically possible but super rare. Sounds legit for dry, stiff whiskers.
Why this score: Unusual personal experience with no medical precedent needed. - Beard hair can dry out and splinter like stiff fibers if neglected; plausible for someone arguing about dryness. - No documented cases widely, but anecdotal reports exist online — fits 'mildly infuriating' vibe without red flags.
Original quote: “Got a splinter from my own beard in the middle of an argument with my girlfriend about my beard being dry. I did. I didn't even know that was a thing. I didn't know you could get splinters from your own beard.”
Forgot butter packet in pocket, melted when reaching for keys — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 9:42
Pocket butter disaster — yeah that's 100% user error, hilarious self-own 💀🍪
Why this score: Pure humorous reaction to a dumb mistake, not a factual claim. - Classic 'mildly infuriating' bit: forgetting cafe butter packet leads to greasy keys. - Commentary nails the absurdity — who pockets warm butter? Deserves the roast.
Original quote: “I forgot I had a packet of butter in my pocket. So when I left for work and reached for my keys, this was the result. What do you mean you forgot you had a packet of butter in your pocket? Who Who CAR WHO TRANSPORTS BUTTER IN THEIR POCK? THAT'S YOUR OWN FAULT.”
School library getting crappy AI-generated kids books as donations — Personal Story (75/100)
At 10:06
AI art in kids books flooding libraries — spot on trend, quality sucks and ethics iffy.
Why this score: Relatable anecdote matching 2026 publishing trends. - AI art in children’s books is booming but criticized for low quality, artist displacement, and undisclosed training data issues; libraries seeing influx of cheap donations. - Speaker's 'crappy' take aligns with reviewer consensus favoring human illustrators.
Original quote: “Our school library keeps getting these kids books with crappy AI artist as donations. That's [ __ ] dreadful, man. That's so bad. Yeah. Yeah. We're cooked. We're cooked.”
Bat hanging above dining table, unsure how to remove safely — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 10:25
Bat over dinner table panic — open windows, don't grab it, call pros if rabid vibes 🦇😬
Why this score: Funny real-time freakout over practical problem. - Bats aren't aggressive but rabies risk means: isolate, open exits, dim lights, contact wildlife control — not the spider glass trick. - Spot-on confusion; most folks aren't taught this, adds relatable humor.
Original quote: “This little [ __ ] has been hanging on my ceiling like for an hour now. Just right below it is our family dining table. How the How the [ __ ] do you get rid of a bat? Like what is the protocol there? I know how to get rid of a spider. You put the glass on it. You slide the the the paper…”
Sabbath mode means oven won't work on Sundays — BS (10/100)
At 10:30
Nah, Sabbath mode is for Jews to use oven on Sabbath without 'working' it — turns off lights/heat cycles. Not a Sunday lockdown 💀
Why this score: Classic misunderstanding. Sabbath mode disables automatic shutoffs, displays, and lights so observant Jews can use appliances without violating religious rules on the Sabbath (Friday sunset to Saturday sunset).
- Doesn't disable the oven — lets it run continuously.
- 'Won't work on Sundays' is pure invention; Sabbath isn't Sunday.
Original quote: “Accidentally turned on Sabbath mode on my oven and now it won't let me reset it back to normal settings. What does Sabbath mean? Does that Does that mean it won't work on Sundays?”
School fed student faces to AI for yearbook instead of real photos — Personal Story (70/100)
At 12:30
Personal story — can't verify but schools increasingly use AI for photos. Creepy if true.
Why this score: Anecdote from personal experience. No way to independently confirm this specific school's actions, but AI in school photography is real and growing.
- Schools like those using services from Lifetouch or similar have piloted AI enhancements for yearbooks.
- Plausible given 2024-2026 trends in edtech automating image processing.
- Score reflects validity of testimony, not provability.
Original quote: “school uses AI for school pictures. What? They fed our faces to AI for our graduation page in the school yearbook that none of us could send it to instead of using our actual school photos.”
Guy texts dominant savage gentleman vibe over early wake-up — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 13:18
This text chain is peak try-hard smooth guy energy — what even is 'dominant savage yet respectful'? 💀
Why this score: Pure commentary on absurd dating texts. No factual claims, just sharing a funny/wtf interaction for entertainment.
- Classic Reddit-style 'wrong number confidence boost' trope.
- The escalating dom-posturing over breakfast plans is comedy gold.
- No fact-checking needed; reaction warranted for the sheer cringe.
Original quote: “Met a nice guy at the bar, but had to leave for a party. This is what I woke up to. How early are you capable or willing to wake up? I could be the dominant dominant savage yet respectful. What What does that have to do with waking up early? I could be the dominant savage yet respectful gentleman.”
Text guy calls her 'little princess,' boasts high standards and directness — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 14:26
'Little princess'? Bro's auditioning for fedora villain in a bad romcom. Peak self-delusion. 😂
Why this score: Highlight reel of overconfident texter. This is the money shot — unearned swagger and weird pet names.
- 'Real man goes directly after what he wants' is classic PUA script vibes.
- Laugh track in transcript sells the reaction perfectly.
- Worth calling out for universal secondhand embarrassment.
Original quote: “For your information, I am very single. Yes, by choice. My standards are extremely high because I know what I [laughter] I know who I am and what I offer. Little princess. Not a wild text or blowing you up. I'm just being very clear with a supposedly single lady. A real man goes directly after what…”
See the full analysis with timestamps →