You Know What This Video Is About
Credibility score: 49/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "You Know What This Video Is About" and rated it 49/100 for credibility (a BS score of 51/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-05-24. Its weakest claim — "Glitch's marketing and shows lack diversity, comparing it to a Klan rally" — scored 35/100 and was flagged as sketchy. 20 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 20 claims analyzed: 1 scored under 40, 19 between 40 and 69, and 0 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Digital Circus finale leak makes its fandom rival Star Wars and The Pit as worst recently — Opinion (50/100)
At 0:00
Calling any fandom 'the worst' is pure subjective heat — no objective ranking exists.
Why this score: Subjective ranking. Key issues:
- No measurable metric defines 'worst fandom'
- Comparisons to Star Wars rely on personal taste
- 'Phantom' reference is too vague to verify
Original quote: “The amazing digital circuses finale just got leaked and this phantom is starting to give Star Wars and the pit a run for their money in being the worst fandom in recent memory and we have to talk about all of it.”
Digital Circus movie releasing on YouTube plus theaters for extra revenue — Unverifiable (50/100)
At 0:18
No public confirmation of theatrical + YouTube dual release yet.
Why this score: Release strategy unconfirmed. Key issues:
- Video presents it as known fact
- No studio announcements or credible reports match this plan
- Could be rumor or speculation at this stage
Original quote: “Okay, so for those of you who aren't in the loop, this movie is coming out. Yes, it's going to be on YouTube, but they also want to put it in theaters as why not make a little bit more money, but more importantly have like this giant”
Movie leak in Brazil was completely predictable — Opinion (50/100)
At 0:30
Calls the Brazil leak 'inevitable' before it even happened — classic hindsight flex.
Why this score: Personal prediction presented as obvious fact. Key points:
- Speaker claims they 'had it down in Spain' but it landed in Brazil
- No evidence shown for why they expected leaks in either country
- Relies on general knowledge of piracy patterns rather than specific intel
Original quote: “not make a little bit more money, but more importantly have like this giant moment for indie animation where after all this fighting to be recognized to get legitimacy to put it in theaters and to have it be a massive success and prove to everyone that this is the future, which is cool, awesome.…”
Prefers spoiling media himself to decide if it's worth watching — Personal Story (50/100)
At 2:30
Totally valid personal preference — some people hate uncertainty more than spoilers.
Why this score: Personal choice about media consumption. No factual claim to verify here.
- Speaker is describing their own habit of seeking spoilers
- This is a common strategy among some viewers who want to avoid wasting time
- No external evidence needed for someone's stated preference
Original quote: “Now I can live with spoilers. In fact I spoil a lot of media for me so I make sure that I know like what I'm getting into is going to be worth my time.”
Haters suddenly dominating conversations about Glitch after 'the great switch up' — Opinion (50/100)
At 4:30
Calling it 'the great switch up' is a vibe, not data — hard to prove when the hate started dominating.
Why this score: Subjective framing of online discourse. Key points:
- Speaker admits they don't know what triggered the shift
- Personal perception that 'haters' now control the narrative
- No specific metrics or examples of changed conversation volume
Original quote: “people have been looking for so many reasons to slander Glitch. As I don't know what happened recently that has just caused this I'm just going to call it the great switch up to begin but people have had opinions about Glitch for its entire run. But only recently has it gotten to a point where…”
Theatrical release 2 weeks early created too many spoiler risks — Opinion (50/100)
At 4:45
Fair point about spoiler windows — two weeks is genuinely brutal when your job is being online.
Why this score: Personal frustration with timing. Key points:
- Speaker acknowledges the achievement but flags practical downside
- Job requirement to stay on social media makes avoidance impossible
- No data on actual spoiler incidents, just logical concern
Original quote: “Personally, when it comes to them releasing the movie in theaters, I don't really have a problem. The most annoying thing for me is like, oh, it was 2 weeks before. I was like, that is way too much time for things not to be just horrifically spoiled. It was like a week. It was like five days.”
Glitch went from unknown to global phenomenon with Netflix deals and most popular show — Dubious (45/100)
At 5:05
Big claims on 'most popular show on the planet' and 'made so much bank' — sounds impressive but needs receipts.
Why this score: Marketing language without specifics. Key points:
- 'Most popular show on the planet' is a very strong claim
- No viewer numbers, revenue figures, or Netflix deal details provided
- Transition from niche to mainstream is real for indie animation but scale is unverified here
Original quote: “But I get why Glitch would want to put it out in theaters at all as it is such a cool achievement for a studio to go from basically nobody properly giving a fuck unless they're in the animation space to, oh, this is a global phenomena. They have made so much bank. They've made groundbreaking deals…”
Big studios ignore 20M YouTube views, prefer low-budget indie DVD sales — Personal Story (50/100)
At 6:30
Classic Hollywood vs internet disconnect — the speaker heard this secondhand from unnamed creators.
Why this score: Anecdotal claim about studio priorities. Key points:
- Speaker admits they "don't remember the exact YouTuber group"
- Reflects real industry bias toward theatrical or physical sales metrics over platform views
- Common complaint in creator circles but presented as personal recollection rather than documented evidence
Original quote: “A lot of like mainstream companies do not give a fuck about views. Like I remember talking about I don't remember the exact YouTuber group that were talking about this, but they were saying essentially like, "Hey, we have like 20 million views on our videos like consistently, but that doesn't mean…”
Glitch dominates indie animation but remains minor compared to Netflix/Amazon — Opinion (50/100)
At 6:50
Fair take on scale — Glitch is successful in its niche but not a streaming giant.
Why this score: Subjective assessment of Glitch Productions' industry position. Points:
- Glitch has grown significantly in indie animation with series like The Amazing Digital Circus
- Still far smaller in revenue and reach than Netflix or Amazon originals
- "Biggest fish in a very small pond" framing is reasonable editorial opinion
Original quote: “But the internet is the internet and this spoiler situation was going to happen no matter what. This is the business logic that explains why Glitch made the choices that it did. And the reality that for as much as like Glitch has come to dominate the indie space to be like, oh, the company, it…”
Anger at Glitch for 'selling out' is stupid; growth is necessary to survive — Opinion (50/100)
At 8:30
Classic underdog-to-winner backlash — people love the scrappy phase until it stops being scrappy.
Why this score: This is a value judgment, not a factual claim. Key points:
- Speaker argues staying tiny = bankruptcy risk, using Disney's multiple near-bankruptcies as comparison
- Notes Glitch still lacks diversified revenue (theme parks, TV, etc.)
- Frames criticism as resentment of success rather than specific business decisions
- Distinguishes between valid critique and blanket 'don't grow' sentiment
Original quote: “very small pond of two. And it seems like so much of the anger at Glitch is for this perception of selling out, which I've always found to be kind of stupid. As yes, indie animation is independent, is doing its own thing, is making the shows that major corporations wouldn't want to. But for the…”
Glitch gets extra criticism because people feel personal ownership from its indie roots — Opinion (50/100)
At 10:30
Fair point on the double standard — indie origins do create weird fan entitlement.
Why this score: Perception of ownership is real in fandoms. Key factors:
- Early supporters often treat the company like "their" project
- Same behavior happens with other once-indie studios (e.g. early Valve, Mojang)
- Doesn't excuse poor decisions but explains why backlash feels more personal
Original quote: “negative about them. But everything negative that people say about Glitch has been done by other companies. And I'm not saying that, oh that means they're free. It's like, oh, everyone's bad, so no one should say anything about it. But I do believe that there's something more here going on. And…”
Glitch's indie start makes fans feel more connected than to bigger studios — Opinion (50/100)
At 10:45
Classic parasocial trap — early access breeds "we're in this together" feelings.
Why this score: Ground-floor connection creates stronger emotional investment. Points:
- Supporters who joined during small phases often expect ongoing special treatment
- Larger studios rarely trigger the same loyalty because the relationship starts corporate
- Explains why Glitch gets more "betrayal" accusations than Netflix
Original quote: “That glitch being like, oh, originally indie, that people were there for like kind of the ground start that has led to the idea that they have more of a connection to the show and the creators than with anything else.”
Disappointment over regional release delays is understandable, not entitlement — Opinion (50/100)
At 11:00
Valid take — global spoiler culture makes the delay sting more for non-US fans.
Why this score: Regional release friction is a real issue. Factors:
- US-centric release windows often ignore international audiences
- Social media makes spoilers unavoidable regardless of official availability
- Frustration doesn't automatically equal entitlement when access is genuinely blocked
Original quote: “Look, I'm not going to call anybody entitled for being disappointed that Glitch couldn't release the movie or just chose not to push for it in a country where you live. That's annoying. That sucks, especially when you have Americans just fucking blasting the spoilers across the globe.”
Biggest criticism against Glitch is the narrative that they're personally betraying fans — Opinion (50/100)
At 11:20
Accurate read — "betrayal" framing turns business decisions into moral failures.
Why this score: Personal betrayal narrative is common online. Issues:
- Companies rarely act out of personal malice toward individual fans
- Legal and market constraints get ignored in favor of "they did this to hurt us"
- Turns disappointment into something that feels more dramatic and shareable
Original quote: “But amongst all the things I see Glitch get criticized for, one of the biggest is simply the idea that they are betraying their fans. That this is some personal like, oh, they did this to me in particular.”
Glitch's actions are likely limited by Korean legal constraints around the trial — Opinion (50/100)
At 11:35
Plausible — Korean legal rules often restrict public statements during ongoing cases.
Why this score: Legal gag orders are common in Korean proceedings. Key points:
- Parties in high-profile cases are frequently barred from discussing details
- Public silence can look like evasion even when it's legally required
- Explains why Glitch's communication feels evasive to international fans
Original quote: “And it's not just a factor of like, oh, there is a greater system. There is greater limitations. Who the fuck knows what's actually going on in South Korea as whatever brief they gave that is clearly just you can't say anything till the trial.”
Social media is celebrating Glitch's problems because outrage drives engagement and money — Opinion (50/100)
At 11:50
Spot on — platforms reward drama because it keeps people scrolling and monetizing.
Why this score: Outrage economy is well documented. Evidence:
- Algorithmic systems prioritize emotionally charged content
- Creators and accounts profit from piling on during controversies
- The speaker correctly notes the hypocrisy while still participating
Original quote: “But there is such an active glee that has been going on at Glitches Falling that oh that this movie got released and people are fucking cheering for it that has got me just a little bit annoyed as it does feel like for social media we are living through some of the worst timelines as this thing is…”
Fans blaming Glitch for movie release are spreading misinformation — Glitch never promised free access and pointed to Netflix/YouTube — Dubious (45/100)
At 12:30
Claims specific Glitch statements exist but gives zero receipts — hard to verify without links.
Why this score: Unverifiable specifics. Speaker asserts Glitch explicitly told people the show stays on YouTube and Netflix, yet no quote, post, or link is provided. The 'misinformation' claim hinges on this unshown evidence.
Original quote: “fan entitlement that a piece of media that most of the people talking have never actually paid for isn't conveniencing them in every way possible and is therefore to blame for the current situation and not the person who actually leaked the movie. And when you add on to it all the misinformation,…”
Goose Work can't control the leak and their chill response is normal — Opinion (50/100)
At 14:30
Fair take on creator boundaries — expecting them to hunt leakers is wild.
Why this score: Reasonable opinion on fan expectations. Key points:
- Creators rarely control leaks once something is out
- Their casual tone matches their established social media style
- Demanding personal revenge is unrealistic and extreme
Original quote: “disappear for months. That's been confirmed to like not have been in their control. And right now people are getting mad at Goose Work for saying like shrugging at like the announcement of the leak. And it's like, yeah, they're trying to be blasze. That's always been their fucking weird vibe on all…”
Glitch's marketing and shows lack diversity, comparing it to a Klan rally — Sketchy (35/100)
At 16:30
The Klan rally line is wild hyperbole — kills any serious diversity critique.
Why this score: False equivalence destroys the point.
- Glitch shows have featured diverse casts in multiple series
- Marketing campaigns often target broad audiences
- Klan comparison is inflammatory and inaccurate, not a factual assessment
Original quote: “to have the hottest takes to say in the most catchy way possible where yes, we can talk about how there is a bit of an issue with the way Glitch rolled out the movie where it was basically begging everyone to say, "Hey, make some noise so we can get this put into your theater near you." or…”
Accusations pile up when someone skips replying to every attack — Opinion (50/100)
At 18:30
Classic online pile-on dynamic — silence gets read as guilt even when it's strategic.
Why this score: Perception vs reality in fandom arguments. Key points:
- Not replying to every point is treated as admitting defeat
- This is a common debate tactic that creates a false narrative of failure
- The speaker notes this happens frequently in Digital Circus discussions
Original quote: “like, "Bro, you are at a steakhouse trying to order sushi. They aren't cooking what you're looking for, so just go find the indie show that is." It becomes like a common debate thing where you launch a thousand different accusations at someone else saying like, "Oh, you failed at this, this, and…”
See the full analysis with timestamps →