Credibility score: 48/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "This is genuinely f*cked up.." and rated it 48/100 for credibility (a BS score of 52/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-15. Its weakest claim — "Claims law strips human rights from child abusers" — scored 15/100 and was flagged as bs. 14 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 14 claims analyzed: 1 scored under 40, 13 between 40 and 69, and 0 at 70 or above.
At 4:30
Pure visual guess with zero medical basis — still horrifying either way.
Why this score: Visual speculation only. No forensic details provided. - Timeframe stated as 'about a month' based on appearance alone. - Matches community comments noting the mother seems more panicked about getting caught than the death itself.
Original quote: “That baby's been dead for about a month, it looks like.”
At 8:48
Framing cops as the fix-all tool for child abuse, robbery, and drugs — that's the exact line.
Why this score: Opinion on policing scope. No data offered on how often police actually resolve those cases versus other agencies.
Original quote: “this is one of the reasons why I've always been like a pretty big supporter of the police is that yeah, I mean obviously there's bad police officers and things like that that happen, but like if you've got a deal like I mean they're basically used as a Swiss Army knife for every single problem”
At 9:11
Anecdote about 'all' officers he's spoken to — can't verify the sample size.
Why this score: Personal Story. Speaker cites unnamed conversations; no way to check how many officers or what was said.
Original quote: “I feel like I've talked to some police officers. All of them have had like really bad stories like this. It's crazy.”
At 9:28
Equates accountability talk with supremacy claims — that's a rhetorical leap.
Why this score: Opinion. No evidence presented that most criticism uses supremacy framing; this is the speaker's interpretation.
Original quote: “I find it to be especially disgusting whenever you have like all this negativity and hostility leveraged at police officers like it's some kind of supremacy or something like that”
At 10:30
Calling someone sub-human rational is a moral judgment, not a fact.
Why this score: Opinion claim about mental capacity. No clinical assessment or evidence presented. Speaker is expressing personal view on the suspect's state of mind.
Original quote: “You can't apply a normal human being's rational decision-making skills to a person like this.”
At 10:37
Bold stance — but it's a values take, not something to fact-check.
Why this score: Opinion claim about whether dehumanization is justified. Speaker is stating their ethical position directly.
Original quote: “Absolutely I am. 100 fucking%. Yeah. What do you think?”
At 14:30
Pulls the 2% figure from thin air — no source, just vibes.
Why this score: Pure opinion dressed as statistic. - No data, study, or agency cited for the 2% number - Speaker presents it as established fact after watching "enough of these videos" - Generalizing an entire "subset of people" based on selective clips
Original quote: “this is a 2% [__] I tell y'all this over and over and over that people don't want to admit it, but it is true. And if you watch enough of these videos, you're going to be in the same position that I am. And you know, this is the way these people are. Like there is a there's a a subset of people…”
At 16:30
Cops say the autopsy showed starvation — but no medical examiner report or name is cited here.
Why this score: Unverifiable without documentation. The video states the medical examiner's conclusion but provides no supporting records or named source. - No autopsy report referenced - No official statement or news link given - Community comments accept the claim but offer no evidence either
Original quote: “The medical examiners eventually confirmed the cause of death. It's starvation. The starve the kid.”
Sources: NOT GUILTY: Jury acquits Brandon Cervera in child starvation case, Defense experts dispute starvation as cause of 4-year-old boy's death, Jury finds Brandon Cervera not guilty in the starvation death of his 4-year-old son
At 18:30
Calling child-starvers 'NPCs who can't plan past 15 minutes' sounds tidy — real neglect cases show deliberate, repeated choices over days.
Why this score: Generalization, not evidence. - Top comments note a 2-year-old won't silently starve for a week without protest - The transcript itself describes starvation over time, contradicting the 'no plan' framing - Reduces complex abuse to a personality type with zero supporting data
Original quote: “one thing that you have to understand with people like this is that they don't ever think about, they don't have plans. People like this don't make plans. They just simply live about 5 to 10 minutes, maybe 15 minutes ahead of where they're currently at.”
At 22:30
Straight-up cheering a death on camera — zero context, just raw spite
Why this score: Pure opinion with no factual component to verify. - No claim about evidence or law, just moral judgment - Community comments show widespread disgust at the same statement
Original quote: “He was dead. He deserves to be dead. >> Deserves to be dead.”
At 24:30
Calls for preemptive 'box' detention based on vibes, not evidence.
Why this score: Preventive detention argument with zero legal or statistical backing. Key issues: - No definition of 'Nevron' given - Ignores due process and false positive risks - No data shown that early removal reduces crime rates
Original quote: “if you let people like this run wild, they're going to create all kinds of negative effects all around them... the sooner that you figure out that somebody is a Nevron and you put them in the box, then the problems go away.”
At 26:30
Gives specific sentence numbers but no court link or case name — can't check if the numbers are real.
Why this score: The speaker states precise prison terms and charges. No public records, news articles, or court documents are referenced in the segment or web context to verify the exact sentence lengths or confirm the defendant's identity.
Original quote: “In the end, Jonathan was sentenced to 24 to 50 years on a charge of secondderee murder. 86 months to 10 years on a secondderee child abuse charge. Got him.”
At 28:30
No law exists that removes someone's status as a "human being" — that's not how rights work
Why this score: False legal claim about rights forfeiture. - No US or UK law removes "human being" status from criminals - Rights can be restricted (voting, firearms) but personhood remains - Sounds like rhetorical escalation, not actual statute
Original quote: “There's only one kid that died. And uh yeah, we need a cause and law says you forfeit your rights to human being when you abuse a child”
At 30:30
Grief doesn't come with a streaming ban — people cope weirdly under stress.
Why this score: Personal opinion on how grief should look. - No medical or psychological standard says streaming equals lack of distress. - People process trauma in varied ways; behavior alone doesn't prove intent. - Commenters note the timeline (month later) but that's separate from this claim.
Original quote: “if she was really distraught with what happened to her baby, she wouldn't be streaming. I mean, obviously, right?”