The unredacted footage is even worse..
Credibility score: 49/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "The unredacted footage is even worse.." and rated it 49/100 for credibility (a BS score of 51/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-09. Its weakest claim — "He's outside U.S. jurisdiction so police can't reach him" — scored 10/100 and was flagged as bs. 30 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
New owner took inventory but kept money from original owner — Unverifiable (50/100)
Core accusation with zero receipts shown so far — just stated as fact.
Josh lied to police about LEGO sets in store — Unverifiable (50/100)
Says metadata and pictures prove Josh lied — no actual files shown here.
Ben Schneider threatened to murder the manager — Dubious (40/100)
Accusation of murder threat dropped then immediately denied — zero receipts either way.
Says police can serve papers by just saying "you're served" and dropping them — Dubious (45/100)
Service rules aren't that casual — "drop and declare" isn't standard in most US jurisdictions
Not accepting papers on video counts as acknowledging service — Sketchy (35/100)
Avoiding physical acceptance usually doesn't equal legal acknowledgment — courts want clear proof of delivery
Police are brainstorming charges instead of serving papers — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it "making stuff up" is speculation — the transcript shows discussion, not fabrication
Papers are fake court documents, police confirm nothing filed — Unverifiable (50/100)
Guy says Keizer PD verified no case exists — we only hear his side of that call.
Questions logic of process server arriving with harasser — Opinion (50/100)
Rhetorical question, not a verifiable claim — pure speculation on motive.
Claims Josh is fabricating stories to avoid being served — Opinion (50/100)
Speculates on Josh's knowledge and motives with zero receipts shown.
Accuses Josh of felony for lying about threat to police — Dubious (45/100)
Calling it a felony requires proving intent and elements of crime — transcript shows accusation, not proof.
Claims cops muted audio to dodge serving papers liability — Opinion (50/100)
Interprets police behavior as deliberate cover — no transcript of muted section provided.
Opinion that the cop should be jailed for conduct — Opinion (50/100)
Personal call for jail time — strong take, zero legal analysis offered.
Claims the papers are fake and the lawsuit was printed up — Opinion (50/100)
He's calling it fake while the officer is literally explaining how easy it is to serve papers legally in Utah.
Says a real process server wouldn't ride with the YouTuber — Opinion (50/100)
He's framing the ride-along as proof of fakery, but nothing in Utah law actually prohibits that.
Police are ready to arrest for cyberbullying and digital stalking under Utah law — Dubious (45/100)
Utah has cyberstalking statutes, but "cyber bullying" is mostly a school thing — adults usually get charged under harassment or stalking laws.
Utah process server requirements are just 18+, unaffiliated, not an attorney — Solid (80/100)
This one actually checks out — Utah has some of the loosest process server rules in the country.
Girl qualifies as process server under Utah law — OK (60/100)
Utah rules match the three requirements he listed — but 'met her 10 minutes ago' isn't exactly ironclad proof.
Anyone 18+ and unaffiliated can serve papers in Utah — Solid (75/100)
That's literally what the statute says — no license required.
Woman is impersonating a process server — Opinion (50/100)
Josh's legal theory — still waiting on any evidence beyond 'I say so.'
Only three ways to be impersonating — all ruled out — OK (65/100)
Logic holds if the ID check and 'never met' statements are accurate — both rest on unshown evidence.
Josh can't know she's an attorney if he's never met her — Opinion (50/100)
Clever rhetorical trap — doesn't actually prove anything about her status.
Amon committed obstruction of justice by lying to police — Dubious (35/100)
Calling it obstruction requires proving intent and materiality — none shown here.
Refusing service means he's been legally served and case is over — Dubious (45/100)
Refusing papers doesn't automatically equal service — depends on jurisdiction rules.
They stole $200k and breached a signed contract — Dubious (45/100)
The $200k theft figure is stated as fact — web sources mention accusations but no confirmed amount.
Sources: r/SALEM on Reddit: The $200k LEGO Thief Scandal is Insane, Bricks & Minifigs - Salem, OR Reviews 2026 | Trustindex.io, r/missoula on Reddit: Bricks & Minifigs Stole a Man's $200,000 LEGO Collection
Claims these videos prove anti-cop people right about police corruption — Opinion (50/100)
He's admitting the footage backs the critics he hates. That's the whole point of releasing it.
Claims IRS approved 'Scientology sucks' as a religion — Dubious (45/100)
IRS doesn't hand out official religion stamps — anyone can file as a church for tax purposes.
He's outside U.S. jurisdiction so police can't reach him — BS (10/100)
He's literally on a recorded police call in Utah — the "no jurisdiction" line is pure theater.
Says the situation deserves presidential and DA involvement — Opinion (50/100)
Calling for the president and DA over a Lego corporate split — that's escalation on another level
CEO tried to jail Ben and stole Legos from a dying man — Dubious (40/100)
Accuses CEO of trying to jail Ben and stealing from dying man — both are serious claims with zero receipts here.
Police colluded with fraudsters to ruin lives and block lawsuits — Dubious (45/100)
Strong accusation of coordinated cover-up — the footage backs interference but not the full collusion-for-fraud plot.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →