Unbelievable that people like this exist..
Credibility score: 46/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "Unbelievable that people like this exist.." and rated it 46/100 for credibility (a BS score of 54/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-23. Its weakest claim — "Declaring voter ID laws 'racist' and 'bad' without immediate evidence." — scored 45/100 and was flagged as loaded language. 8 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 8 claims analyzed: 0 scored under 40, 8 between 40 and 69, and 0 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Setting the scene for a reaction video — just vibes. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 0:00
Just setting up the watch party, no claims yet — pure intro energy. 🍿
Why this score: The speaker is introducing the video they're about to react to, explaining their viewing process. It's conversational setup, not a factual claim or persuasive argument.
Original quote: “this is crazy I only watched half of it
and I was like I should probably watch
the other half on stream do you have an”
Declaring voter ID laws 'racist' and 'bad' without immediate evidence. — Loaded Language (45/100)
At 0:05
Jumps straight to 'racist' and 'bad' as if it's self-evident — strong words doing the heavy lifting. 🚩
Why this score: The speaker uses emotionally charged terms ('racist,' 'bad') to describe voter ID laws without providing specific examples or data to support why they are inherently racist or bad at this point. This frames the issue negatively from the outset.
Original quote: “opinion on voter ID laws uh yeah they're
usually pretty racist and they're bad I
think voter ID laws are a way to”
Doubling down on voter ID laws 'perpetuating racism' and 'suppressing African-American vote'. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 0:11
Confidently states 'for sure' and 'definitely' about voter suppression — still zero data, just vibes. 🤡
Why this score: The speaker reiterates and strengthens their claim that voter ID laws 'perpetuate racism' and 'definitely' suppress the African-American vote. While this is a common argument, the absolute certainty ('for sure,' 'definitely') is presented without any specific evidence or studies to back it up in this moment, relying solely on conviction.
Original quote: “perpetuate racism would you say they're
would you go as far to say those laws
are racist for sure do you think it
suppresses the African-American vote”
Claiming minority voters are 'less likely to have the kinds of IDs' required. — Missing Context (45/100)
At 0:18
Assumes minority voters 'don't have' the IDs — completely skips *why* or *how many* are affected. 🤷♀️
Why this score: The speaker makes a broad generalization that 'minority voters are less likely to have the kinds of IDs' required, and then starts to imply they 'don't live in areas with' access. This statement lacks crucial context regarding the specific types of IDs, the actual percentage of minority voters affected, or the systemic barriers that might lead to this situation. It presents a conclusion without the supporting details.
Original quote: “definitely minority voters are less
likely to have the kinds of ideas that
have been um described or required these
type of people don't live in areas with”
Claiming Black people lack knowledge or awareness to use the internet for online services. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 0:30
Saying Black people 'don't have the knowledge' or 'aren't aware' of how the internet works, like it's 1998. That's a bold generalization with zero data. 💀
Why this score: The speaker makes a broad, stereotypical assertion about an entire demographic's digital literacy without providing any evidence or specific examples. It's a confident claim that lacks any basis in reality, especially in 2026. The top comments also highlight this as a ridiculous take.
Original quote: “easy access to DMVs or other plac no no no no no no no no get ready do you think that's harder for black people to go online well I feel like they don't have the knowledge of how well I feel like they don't have the knowledge of how of like how it works a lot of people have smartphones but you…”
Connecting felon disenfranchisement in swing states like Florida to 'repression of Black voting.' — Missing Context (45/100)
At 0:53
Linking felon disenfranchisement directly to 'repression of Black voting' in Florida without mentioning the specifics of Amendment 4. It's a half-truth that misses the whole damn story. 🚩
Why this score: While felon disenfranchisement disproportionately affects Black communities, Florida's Amendment 4 (passed in 2018) restored voting rights to most felons, excluding those convicted of murder or felony sexual offenses, upon completion of their sentences. The speaker omits this crucial context, presenting a simplified and potentially misleading picture of 'repression' without acknowledging the significant changes that have occurred.
Original quote: “I also think there's a repression of like black voting with um how they how if you're a convicted telling like you're not allowed to vote and everything and when you look at swing States like Florida that's a huge population of the of the like African Americans like it's got to be fake right I mean…”
Dismissing claims about internet access as 'stupidity' and suggesting 'everybody has access to the internet.' — Missing Context (45/100)
At 1:55
Saying 'everybody has access to the internet' like it's a universal truth. Someone forgot about the digital divide, huh? 🤦♀️
Why this score: While the speaker is reacting to a clearly racist and false stereotype, their counter-argument that 'everybody has access to the internet' is also an oversimplification. Digital access and literacy are not uniform across all demographics, and socioeconomic factors still play a significant role. While the previous claim was BS, this response misses the nuances of actual internet access challenges.
Original quote: “that's just stupidity honestly everybody has access to the internet even a little kid can figure out I work the internet a little kid could figure out how to work the internet yeah I had access to the internet for years what people are they talking to what are who are these people talking to you…”
Asserting that 'poor Black people have no access to the internet' and 'can't figure out how to use it.' — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 2:25
Doubling down on the 'Black people can't internet' trope, specifically targeting 'poor Black people.' It's a stereotype so dusty it needs a museum exhibit. 🤡
Why this score: This is another broad, unsubstantiated generalization that perpetuates harmful stereotypes about digital literacy and access within specific communities. While digital divides exist, claiming 'no access' and 'can't figure out how to use it' for an entire group is a gross oversimplification and lacks any supporting evidence. The community feedback clearly indicates this is a widely rejected and offensive claim.
Original quote: “and I also heard a lot that black people especially poor black people have no access to the internet can't figure out how to use the internet just so serious what that's a”
See the full analysis with timestamps →