Credibility score: 51/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "The finale of looking up Deltarune on deviantart" and rated it 51/100 for credibility (a BS score of 49/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-09-07. Its weakest claim — "Dismisses child content concerns with 'it's fiction'" — scored 20/100 and was flagged as straw man. 19 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 19 claims analyzed: 1 scored under 40, 15 between 40 and 69, and 3 at 70 or above.
At 2:45
Invented a whole nonsense term for fanart and acted shocked by it. Peak comedy.
Why this score: He's not analyzing — he's just stringing random words together to roast the art, which is the entire bit. No claim, just vibes.
Original quote: “Why is he Oh, he's he's just a withered withered jungler. What?”
At 3:18
Straight-up admitting the comments had to teach him basic spelling. Rare moment of honesty.
Why this score: He's not pretending he knew — he's openly crediting the audience for fixing him. Clean, no trick.
Original quote: “I'll try to spell El Nino and uh Lan Oh my god. Lan Nino and El Ninia right this time because I didn't do that last time.”
At 3:37
Saw a censored image and immediately went to medical horror territory. That's commitment.
Why this score: Pure comedy escalation — no actual claim, just seeing how far he can push the gross-out comparison for laughs.
Original quote: “Why is the first one censored? Why does it kind of look like the one trigger warning prolapse image like the sensors for”
At 4:36
Reads blushing and curves like secret decoder ring — zero receipts for the 'certain' motive.
Why this score: Speaker treats visual tropes as smoking-gun proof of fetish intent. No evidence offered beyond 'it's obvious' — classic overread from pattern recognition, not data.
Original quote: “See guys, this is how you this is how you actually draw people who are like plus-sized and not like, you know, you you can tell it's so just look at the facial expressions and like the detailing. That's that's pro tip. That's how you can tell if they do it for um a certain like O. It's very…”
At 5:31
Eye insists they're distinct while screen shows same palette, same pose, same everything.
Why this score: Trying to salvage variety from repetition by sheer assertion. The transcript itself wobbles ('it's just all the same') then backpedals without new evidence — volume game in miniature.
Original quote: “Oh my god. It's just all the same. It's not all the same. Those are three different pree”
At 6:58
Says 'always the heart tongue' dates it pre-2020 — no proof, just vibes.
Why this score: He's treating a stylistic tic as a timestamp. Plenty of artists still use heart tongues post-pandemic; the 'always' claim is pure pattern recognition dressed as certainty.
Original quote: “I was like, "This I've watched too many Hamilton animatics to know when something was made pre-pandemic."”
At 7:33
Presents Toby's color choices as intentional ship code — no canon source backs that.
Why this score: Toby Fox uses yellow/blue across the whole game, not just ships. The speaker is reading shipping intent into a general aesthetic without evidence the palette was chosen for that purpose.
Original quote: “Toby in his yellow blue color palette for ships like or like warm colors and cold colors.”
At 7:55
Just acknowledging the art exists — nothing to fact-check.
Why this score: Pure reaction. No assertion about the art's accuracy, intent, or meaning. Skip.
Original quote: “There's a weirdly buff art. Yep. Yep. Yep.”
At 8:57
Drops 'trigger warning prolapse' like it's Tuesday — pure comedy timing 💀
Why this score: Not a factual claim, just a shocked reaction to fanart content. The humor comes from treating grotesque imagery as routine browsing material.
Original quote: “trigger warning prolapse again”
At 9:09
Predicts 'gorgeous art' for favorite character like the internet has boundaries 😈
Why this score: Speaker's hope collides with known DeviantArt patterns — assuming restraint from a platform famous for the opposite.
Original quote: “hopefully it'll just be like gorgeous art because that's usually what people tend to do with her”
At 9:32
Genuine shock that some artists can draw without going feral — rare W for humanity 🔥
Why this score: Pure reaction content. No claim being sold, just honest surprise at competent artwork in the wild.
Original quote: “most of this is like actually just like really like holy c like”
At 10:05
Straight-up calls out the art for breaking established heights — correct and boringly factual
Why this score: Speaker knows the source material well enough to spot when fanart violates basic character design facts. Rare moment of pure accuracy.
Original quote: “Oh my god. Chris does not look like that. I'm pretty sure Noel's taller than them”
At 12:44
Hunting for Gacha origin stories like they're sacred texts 😈
Why this score: Speaker treats Gacha fanart as potential 'pre-life' canon — that's not how fan content works, mortal. It's pure entertainment, not archaeology.
Original quote: “I can't think Gacha Panos because I want to see if there's anything pre-life to”
At 13:07
Shocked that Gacha mashed up three unrelated fandoms — welcome to the internet 💀
Why this score: Gacha doesn't respect canon boundaries; it just mashes whatever looks cool. Expecting coherence from that is adorable, mortal.
Original quote: “Hey, I'm in Gacha Club now. Hey, Robloxian 100 Poi. This is Rousey from Delt. Why is [clears throat] Chris there?”
At 13:31
Begging the algorithm to time-travel the cringe back to 2018 — it won't 😈
Why this score: Internet never deletes anything. That 2018 Susie smirk will outlive us all, mortal. Get used to it.
Original quote: “Wait, hold. Please be Please revoke from 2018. Damn it. It's 2024. [gasps] Why is Susie looking at me like that? Why is she smirking?”
At 13:38
Trying to parse Gacha's shipping decisions like they're actual plot holes 🔥
Why this score: Gacha doesn't owe you narrative sense, mortal. It's chaos wearing anime skin and it likes it that way.
Original quote: “Why is Del Why is Gash like boys in Why? How is this? Okay, this is just like what if what is a fool? What?”
At 14:59
Straight observation — the drawings are stylized, not documentary realism 😈
Why this score: Speaker simply notes the gap between drawn proportions and real anatomy without claiming it's wrong or bad. That's honest commentary, not a trick.
Original quote: “She does not have all that. ... I have not seen anyone with that tiny of a waist. What would that be? Like I have like if I have it's only in drawing. So it's like um exaggerations or proportions.”
At 15:57
Comedy pivot: goal was rare pairs, found the opposite, rolls with it 🔥
Why this score: Pure reaction bit — no claim being sold, just the absurdity of searching for rare ships and landing on the popular one instead. Entertainment, not persuasion.
Original quote: “do rare pair because I want to see what ships people come up with and see if I could you know I'm like Actually, wait. That's such a Oh, never. Oh, no. Is it queen? Oh, actually. So, it's just be seeing like I want to Okay, curly is not really a rare for”
At 22:24
Turns the issue into 'fiction vs reality' when the actual complaint is about minors accessing explicit child content.
Why this score: The speaker reframes a discussion about age-appropriate access and platform responsibility into a binary 'fiction isn't real' argument — nobody was arguing fiction equals reality. This dodges the core point about uncensored explicit content of child characters being easily accessible.
Original quote: “Don't come with Dolph. It's fiction [ __ ] Like if you're a pro, don't stop watching my [ __ ]”