How I Sell Put Options for Monthly Income (With a 89% Win Rate)
Credibility score: 43/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "How I Sell Put Options for Monthly Income (With a 89% Win Rate)" and rated it 43/100 for credibility (a BS score of 57/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-09-04. Its weakest claim — "Frames put-selling as 3-out-of-4 win scenarios — omits payoff sizes" — scored 20/100 and was flagged as false equivalence. 30 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
89% win rate on options — no proof, just flex — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Claims 89% wins and $89k profit — zero receipts, just numbers. 😈
Claims $420k verified profits from put-selling — third-party verification cited — No Frame (75/100)
Names Kinfo as third-party verifier — that's specific, not 'experts say.'
90% win rate on put-selling strategy — stated as fact — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
90% win rate sounds divine until you remember the fourth scenario is a crash. That 10% can erase years.
Frames put-selling as 3-out-of-4 win scenarios — omits payoff sizes — False Equivalence (20/100)
Three wins, one loss — treats them as equal when the crash loss can exceed three wins combined.
Promises $677 profit on one put sale — no track record shown — Plain Sales Pitch (45/100)
One trade, one number, zero history — sounds like a pitch, not proof.
72% profit probability — pulled from thin air, no model cited — Confidence Mismatch (20/100)
72% sounds precise. No source, no model, no back-test. Just the number.
3.5% flat return turns into 'higher annualized' if stock rises — math magic. — Missing Context (45/100)
Tells you the 3.5% but hides the part where you actually lose money if the stock drops.
20% on margin sold as the number, 'high risk' buried right after. — Volume Game (45/100)
Drops the 20% like it's normal, then whispers the risk warning in the same breath.
Pivots from teaching to selling coaching — Plain Sales Pitch (45/100)
Free tip → paid program in one breath. Classic funnel move.
Lists proprietary tools without showing proof they work — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
'My screeners and back test' — names zero results, zero track record.
Praises Moomoo dashboard as uniquely powerful — Plain Sales Pitch (45/100)
Calls it 'very powerful' right before walking through the app — ad energy.
Calls the filtered results 'lucrative' before any data appears — Loaded Language (45/100)
'Lucrative' is doing the heavy lifting before you see a single number.
ROI sort presented as the smart filter — ignores assignment risk — Missing Context (45/100)
Sorting by ROI first makes the biggest numbers look best — leaves out how often you actually get assigned the shares.
5% monthly on leveraged ETFs sold as realistic — omits volatility decay — Confidence Mismatch (20/100)
Says 'easily make 5% or more in a month' like it's normal — 3× ETFs bleed in sideways markets and can erase that premium fast.
Single-trade premium shown as monthly income — no position sizing or capital required — Missing Context (45/100)
$727 looks nice until you realize how much cash you'd need to secure that put — the real yield on capital stays hidden.
Title claims 89% win rate on put-selling strategy — Plain Sales Pitch (45/100)
Puts 89% win rate in the title like it's a product spec sheet — sells the number before showing the math. 💀
Claims 4.3% return on cash-secured put trade — Missing Context (45/100)
4.3% on one trade — doesn't say how many trades per month or what happens when assignment hits. 💀
Claims 26% ROI on put spread with 78% probability — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
26% return paired with 78% probability — the math works until the 22% of trades that don't. 🔥
Calls 20-30 delta the 'ideal setup' — personal preference sold as optimal — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Labels his delta choice 'ideal' with zero comparison to other ranges — confidence without data.
Claims 80-90% win rate at 20-30 delta — no source, just assertion — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
Drops 80-90% win rate like it's math — names no backtest, no account, no timeframe.
Says VIX 15-30 is 'best time' to sell puts — timing rule presented as fact — Missing Context (45/100)
Calls high IV the 'best' window while skipping what happens when IV spikes because the market is tanking.
Claims IV rank >30 and percentile >50 as his rule — No Frame (75/100)
Stated his exact filter — no hidden magic, just a line in the sand.
Moomoo only needs $2k for level 3, $10k for level 4 — Plain Sales Pitch (45/100)
Compares Moomoo's low bar to unnamed 'some brokers' — classic sponsored flex.
Free trades plus up to $1,000 bonus via his link — Sponsored (50/100)
Straight promo read — link in bio, cash in your pocket if you bite.
Sold $1,000 put on Sandisk for $7,200 after 40-50% drop — Missing Context (45/100)
Tells the win price but skips the capital at risk and whether he kept the shares.
245% annualized from 7.3% in 10 days — math works, reality doesn't — Confidence Mismatch (20/100)
You can't just multiply 7.3% × 36.5 and call it a yearly rate. Markets don't give you 36 perfect 10-day windows back-to-back.
Survived 43% crash and still made money — survivor bias on full display — Missing Context (45/100)
He only shows the crash he lived through. The ones that break accounts never make the highlight reel.
One trade turns into 162% annualized despite stock dropping — Missing Context (45/100)
Shows one winner, calls it 162% annualized — leaves out how many losers never get mentioned.
Stock drops 52%, still profitable via rolling — no mention of total failures — Missing Context (45/100)
Rolling keeps the story alive, but every roll adds risk and capital. The 89% win rate stays untouched.
Shows cherry-picked winners as proof of 89% rate — Cherry-Picked (20/100)
Only the winning trades get screen time — the 11% losers stay off-camera. 💀
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →