This instantly backfired..
Credibility score: 51/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "This instantly backfired.." and rated it 51/100 for credibility (a BS score of 49/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-03. Its weakest claim — "Top US lawyers contacting him to unredact police audio" — scored 35/100 and was flagged as dubious. 16 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Video opens with a highlight reel preview of an official response. — Just Vibes (50/100)
The intro is pure bait! They're promising drama and then just whispering about it. 🧐😬
Police are confirming Benjamin (Ben) is innocent because he stayed in his car. — Just Vibes (50/100)
The logic here is sound, but they're framing it like a massive victory. — 'Did nothing wrong' sounds so definitive! 🙄👍
Josh stole $200k Star Wars Lego collection — Unverifiable (50/100)
Big number, zero receipts so far 💰❓
Redaction is purely a 'save face' tactic if audio matches perfectly and isn't compromising. — OK (65/100)
It's a logical leap, but it’s the most plausible explanation offered. — 'Save face' is a strong conclusion based on circumstantial evidence 🤔.
The cop must have psychic powers because he sensed the tension *before* touching him, especially since he grabbed a wrist. — Just Vibes (50/100)
Psychic powers? Bro is leaning hard into fantasy here. Maybe it was just good training 👀🔮
The 'L' marker on the X-ray denotes the left shoulder, despite the action showing the right arm being handled. — Just Vibes (50/100)
Wait, so they point out a small 'L' but then immediately say there's a BIG one? Classic distraction tactic. 🙄
Chief reviewed dashcam and still claimed they ran the stop sign — Dubious (40/100)
Quote presented as fact with zero verification.
The police arrested the speaker instead of Josh, despite his threats, and are hiding the evidence in redacted bodycam footage. — Just Vibes (50/100)
They're definitely stonewalling us on this! Redacting everything while claiming justification? Classic move. 🚩😒
The conduct was 'reckless' regarding the potential outcome. — OK (65/100)
It seems to be building on that definition... but we don't see the final conclusion. 🤔
Serving papers isn't stalking and refusal counts as service in Utah — Dubious (45/100)
Process server rules exist but 'refusal = valid service' is not automatic — depends on method and court rules
Police officer noted they could tell things from the raw footage; one person specifically said they saw nothing 'clear as day.' — OK (65/100)
The officer's initial assessment is key. — But saying 'didn't see anything clear as day' sounds like hedging their bets 🙄.
The fact that certain information wasn't redacted proves the whole thing is crooked. — Just Vibes (50/100)
They think *not* redacting something means it's a smoking gun. Classic logic leap! 🚩😬
Top US lawyers contacting him to unredact police audio — Dubious (35/100)
Big claim, zero names or proof offered 💀
The speaker claims Part 3 will feature felony accusations vs. Part 2's misdemeanors, and they are now seeing a lawsuit against the CEO. — Just Vibes (50/100)
The drama is escalating fast! From 'misdemeanors' to full-blown felony accusations—this Patreon situation is wild. 🤯🔥
Patreon valuation is $800 million — Dubious (45/100)
No recent public valuation confirms that exact figure
The speaker speculates that Jewish people might be wealthier than Mormons and questions *how* the content was removed. — Just Vibes (50/100)
Jews vs. Mormons wealth comparison? Classic internet thought experiment 😂🤔
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →