Dating apps broke everything..
Credibility score: 41/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "Dating apps broke everything.." and rated it 41/100 for credibility (a BS score of 59/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-05. Its weakest claim — "All dating-show hosts have 50+ body counts" — scored 5/100 and was flagged as bs. 17 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Video opens with highlight reel preview of dating app experiment — Just Vibes (50/100)
She claims running a guy's Hinge is proving how easy dating apps are — then admits after three days she's never felt worse.
Women on dating apps have extreme delusion about their options — Opinion (50/100)
Pete being a 6 and getting ignored doesn't prove mass female delusion — just proves the algorithm buries average guys
Men gatekeep relationships, women gatekeep sex — Opinion (50/100)
Classic evolutionary-psychology slogan — sounds tidy but ignores how often women initiate and men reject long-term stuff too.
Women only match top 10% of men on dating apps — Dubious (35/100)
The 10% stat is the dating-app version of "all models are size zero" — repeated so much no one checks the source anymore.
Women on apps expect multi-millionaire husbands — Sketchy (20/100)
Hyperbole so big it breaks the app's own math — most users aren't filtering for eight-figure net worth.
Women use apps for ego boosts, men can't — Opinion (50/100)
True that matches feel validating — pretending men don't screenshot their few likes too is just cope.
All dating-show hosts have 50+ body counts — BS (5/100)
Zero evidence, maximum swagger — just throwing shade with no receipts.
6'1, 120k earner can't get dates on apps — Personal Story (50/100)
Anecdote, not data — happens to plenty of guys, but doesn't prove the entire market is broken.
Only top 10% of men get matches on dating apps — Opinion (50/100)
That 10% cutoff is pure lore — no public app data shows an actual threshold.
Body positivity was only for fat women to date each other and they all died so it's over — BS (15/100)
Claims the entire movement died because its founders died from being fat — zero evidence, just a grotesque punchline.
Claims women get dates or sex in under 30 minutes with hundreds of options — Sketchy (35/100)
The "hundreds of men" line is classic manosphere inflation — real data shows far fewer active, quality matches.
Sexual comments work if the guy is hot enough — Opinion (50/100)
Classic halo-effect take — looks decide if it's flirty or creepy.
Women don't want to date wealthy men — Opinion (50/100)
Claims women actively avoid rich guys — gold diggers exist but he says they don't want the role.
Guys blame dating failure on money to dodge personal accountability — Opinion (50/100)
Classic 'it's not you, it's your excuses' take — hits different when you're the one saying it.
Says a guy making $300k isn't 3x more attractive than one making $100k — Opinion (50/100)
Fair point on diminishing returns — once basic stability is covered, extra cash stops moving the needle much.
Looksmaxxing works because it's popular, like steroids and caffeine — Dubious (35/100)
Popularity = effectiveness logic — same defense used for every fad diet and pyramid scheme.
Says wealth alone won't get women to message you — Personal Story (50/100)
Classic "trust me bro" from personal experience — no numbers, just vibes.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →