I actually can't believe this..

Credibility score: 53/100 β€” Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.

BSmeter analyzed "I actually can't believe this.." and rated it 53/100 for credibility (a BS score of 47/100 β€” mixed credibility), on 2026-06-04. Its weakest claim β€” "Iran agreed to no nuclear weapons" β€” scored 35/100 and was flagged as dubious. 4 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.

Of 4 claims analyzed: 1 scored under 40, 2 between 40 and 69, and 1 at 70 or above.

Claims analyzed

Video opens with highlight reel preview β€” Just Vibes (50/100)

At 0:00

Bold teaser β€” let's see if the rest delivers.

Why this score: Standard intro montage pulling dramatic clips. No specific claims to verify yet.

Original quote: β€œTrump fumes at Net and Yahoo. You're [__] crazy. You'd be in prison if it weren't for me. I'm saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this. Donald Trump confirms he told Benjamin Netanyahu that he's [__] crazy on a phone call. I did. I wasn't angry, but I was a…”

Iran agreed to no nuclear weapons β€” Dubious (35/100)

At 0:22

Big claim with zero current evidence backing it.

Why this score: No active agreement exists. - Iran has not signed any verified deal halting enrichment - Ongoing IAEA reports show continued uranium stockpile growth - JCPOA framework collapsed years ago with no replacement in place

Original quote: β€œWe uh they've already agreed they're not going to have a nuclear weapon. Have they? Oh, yeah. They've agreed to that.”

The people being discussed are confirmed as the ones actually making the decisions for the country. β€” Just Vibes (50/100)

At 0:30

They're basically saying everyone else is just window dressing. Classic political spin! πŸ™„πŸ€”

Why this score: High confidence in the assertion based on context. The speaker dismisses 'various levels of people' who are now 'gone,' implying the remaining group holds the true power.

Original quote: β€œpeople you're talking to there are actually the people making the decisions? >> So, we had various levels of people and the first set is gone, the second set is gone. We're dealing with We know they're the they're the people that are leading the country right now.”

He claims being dyslexic isn't ideal for president, despite saying he's smart. β€” Opinion (75/100)

At 2:30

Says dyslexia is a disqualifier if you're President β€” but the 'smart' part throws shade on that logic πŸ€”. It's an opinion, but it lands hard.

Why this score: Personal assessment of presidential fitness based on one trait. Key issues: - The speaker immediately concedes dyslexia isn't inherently bad ('people have it'). - The core argument hinges on the *inability to read a speech*, which is a specific performance metric, not an absolute barrier. - This aligns with general political discourse that downplays cognitive ability vs. perceived competence.

Original quote: β€œHe said he's stupid person. He said he's dyslexic. He can't >> He said that he's Look, I'm not going to knock dyslexia because people have it. But >> it's not ideal if you're president. >> Well, I b it. >> It's not ideal if you're president. >> you can't read a speech. He said he can't read a…”

See the full analysis with timestamps β†’