My response to the Police
Credibility score: 45/100 — Mixed Credibility. Analyzed 17 claims. Found 3 low-credibility claim(s).
Claims analyzed
Claims police broke the law to hide swatting details — Mixed Credibility (40/100)
Serious accusation with zero receipts shown
Claims unredacted audio would reveal the truth about the raid — Mixed Credibility (50/100)
Pure speculation dressed as logic — no evidence the audio changes anything 🧐
Claims officer lied about quick movements based on police report — Mixed Credibility (45/100)
Report says he tensed his arm — doesn't prove the officer couldn't feel it first 💀
Police chief claims they ran a stop sign despite dash cam footage — Mixed Credibility (40/100)
Cites chief's statement but provides no dash cam evidence here.
Says officer must have psychic powers or injured him for no reason — Mixed Credibility (20/100)
False dilemma — either psychic or malicious? Real life has more options than that 💀🔥
Chief of police reviewed video and called it running a stop sign — Mixed Credibility (50/100)
No independent confirmation of what chief actually said.
Josh threatened to shoot process server and speaker to avoid court — Mixed Credibility (60/100)
Personal account of alleged threat — can't verify without records.
Police arrested speaker instead of Josh who allegedly threatened murder — Mixed Credibility (50/100)
Arrest decision can't be confirmed from public sources.
American Fork PD redacted bodycam footage from the incident — Mixed Credibility (50/100)
No evidence either confirming or denying redaction.
Police told her Josh's papers were already served on March 10th — Mixed Credibility (35/100)
She says the police confirmed service — then immediately admits the court clerk saw no proof of service. Contradiction in one breath.
Filing a lawsuit against someone isn't stalking — Mixed Credibility (50/100)
Legal process vs. stalking is a real distinction — depends on facts.
Josh isn't reasonable so his fear doesn't count — Mixed Credibility (50/100)
Calling the other guy 'unreasonable' is convenient but subjective.
Threatening murder over papers proves Josh is unreasonable — Mixed Credibility (50/100)
Personal claim — no way to verify the threat happened.
Police ignored that Josh's fear is unreasonable — Mixed Credibility (50/100)
Arguing the cops got the 'reasonable person' test wrong.
Speaker also feels unsafe due to police search — Mixed Credibility (50/100)
Both sides claim fear — classic he-said-she-said.
Police now say they stopped them for glossy eyes, not heroin tip — Mixed Credibility (35/100)
Direct contradiction between speaker and police — needs unredacted footage.
Footage shows Sheldon locking phone, not deleting evidence — Mixed Credibility (45/100)
Bold claim about what footage shows — without the actual video, this is just assertion.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →