These people are genuinely beyond saving..
Credibility score: 47/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "These people are genuinely beyond saving.." and rated it 47/100 for credibility (a BS score of 53/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-07-18. Its weakest claim — "Claims cop gets power fantasy from 'stupid' people" — scored 20/100 and was flagged as straw man. 28 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Claims 'just started' drinking after being asked how much — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Gives the one answer that screams 'avoiding the question' while acting like it helps.
Downplays drinking with vague qualifier — Volume Game (45/100)
Switches from zero to 'not that much' once pressed — quietly admitting while pretending nothing changed.
Claims "not that much" then admits just left Applebee's — downplaying volume — Missing Context (45/100)
Switches from "nothing" to "not that much" then reveals they just left the bar — timing does the work.
Calls driver and passenger incompetent with zero proof — Loaded Language (45/100)
Labels them as too stupid to function — no evidence given, just contempt.
Blanket incompetence label on the woman — sweeping generalization. — Loaded Language (45/100)
Calls her too dumb to function while she's literally handing over documents.
Questions the humanity of the people involved — Emotional Button (45/100)
Turns a traffic stop into 'what's wrong with these people' — pure disgust framing.
Cop states the violation as fact with no supporting detail — No Frame (75/100)
Direct accusation based on what he saw — straightforward, no tricks.
Cop accepts her work claim then immediately pivots to suspicion — Volume Game (45/100)
Says he believes her then undercuts it with 'but I have some concerns' in the same breath.
Claims cop gets power fantasy from 'stupid' people — Straw Man (20/100)
Turns routine DUI stop into 'psychological domination fantasy' — pure projection, zero evidence.
Speaker admits he'd feel superior dealing with 'stupid' people — No Frame (75/100)
Straight admission — he's describing his own attitude, not the cop's.
Officer orders suspect to stay in vehicle during DUI stop — No Frame (75/100)
Standard safety protocol — nothing sinister, just procedure.
Demands female cop while arguing gender matters — Loaded Language (45/100)
Suddenly cares about male vs female distinction only when it serves her — classic selective principle.
Demands female officer while resisting arrest — Emotional Button (45/100)
Weaponizes 'female' like it's a magic shield — the same person who was just 'a woman' now needs special rules.
Claims excessive force while actively resisting — Missing Context (45/100)
Cries 'don't touch me' while refusing to move — the touch only happens because she won't comply.
Refuses to move while claiming rights — Straw Man (45/100)
Acts like officers are violating rights by asking her to walk — when the actual issue is she won't move at all.
Claims to know rights while demanding supervisor she already sees — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Insists supervisor is right there, then immediately asks where he is — the contradiction is doing the work.
Invokes 'I know my rights' while actively defying orders — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Says it like it's a trump card — zero evidence she actually knows what those rights are in this situation.
Frames routine contact as gendered violence — Emotional Button (45/100)
Escalates neutral physical guidance into 'mean to a woman' — fear and outrage as the persuasion tool.
Claims 'guest law' violation for leaving the car — Missing Context (45/100)
No such 'guest law' exists — that's just cop-speak for 'you didn't listen.'
Blames zodiac sign for behavior instead of intoxication — Just Vibes (50/100)
Scorpio as the reason she's resisting arrest — astrology dodging accountability 💀
Instantly labels her actions as battery on an officer — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Calls it battery before any legal finding — that's charging language with zero trial.
Cops left shoe on purpose out of spite — Missing Context (45/100)
Calls it deliberate spite — skips that drunk, cuffed, kicking suspects change the rules fast.
Cop calls case solved the second she admits the pill isn't hers — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Says 'instantly solved' like possession with no ownership = case closed — that's a legal leap.
Refusal by passenger proves both too drunk to know anything — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Reads refusal as proof of blackout drunk — could've been legal advice or distrust. No receipts for the leap.
Passenger falls — speaker declares 100% alcohol with zero supporting evidence — Confidence Mismatch (20/100)
100% certain it's the booze. Officers did nothing. Bold. Stupid, but bold.
Claims double-jointed flips happen 'a lot' with zero data — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
Says 'this happens a lot' — names zero incidents or stats. Classic anonymous authority move.
Calls drivers 'stupid' then pivots to legal advice — Emotional Button (45/100)
Slaps 'stupid' label then gives solid advice — the insult does the persuading.
Calls the arrestees 'so stupid' for repeating the same mistakes — Loaded Language (45/100)
Blanket 'stupid' label does the work instead of showing any actual pattern or data.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →