'They're Leaving!': Trump Swipes At Mamdani, Claims His Policies Are Driving New Yorkers From City
Credibility score: 45/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "'They're Leaving!': Trump Swipes At Mamdani, Claims His Policies Are Driving New Yorkers From City" and rated it 45/100 for credibility (a BS score of 55/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-27. Its weakest claim — "Setting up a false premise about Obama and 'Mondani' not running in 2020." — scored 45/100 and was flagged as missing context. 22 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Setting up a false premise about Obama and 'Mondani' not running in 2020. — Missing Context (45/100)
Talking about 2020 in 2026 like it's a current problem — that ship sailed, chief. 🚢
Claiming tax hikes are 'forcing' New Yorkers to leave for Florida. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Declaring people are 'forced' to leave and 'most' are going to specific Florida cities with zero data. That's a lot of certainty for a hunch. 🤷♂️
Claiming a specific, high percentage of taxes paid by those leaving. That's a bold number with no backup. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Said '90% of your taxes' like it's a known fact, but where's the data, chief? 💀
Claiming a specific group pays 90% of taxes without evidence. Confidence Mismatch. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Said '90% of your taxes' like it's a known fact, but where's the data, chief? That's a bold number to just drop 💀
Claims the people leaving pay 90% of taxes, a bold number with no source 💀 — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
That '90%' number just dropped like it's common knowledge — zero receipts given. Wild confidence for a huge stat. 😬
Claiming a specific group pays 90% of taxes without evidence. Confidence Mismatch. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Said '90% of your taxes' like it's a known fact, but where's the data, chief? That's a bold number to just drop 💀
Claiming the people leaving pay 90% of taxes, a bold number with no source. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Pulled '90% of your taxes' out of thin air like it's a known fact. That's a huge number to just drop. 💀
Exaggerating inheritance tax with an emotional appeal. Emotional Button. — Emotional Button (45/100)
Went straight for the 'loving father/mother' and 'beautiful child' to make a tax sound extra evil. Classic emotional button push 😭
Painting a grim picture of inheritance tax, focusing on the emotional impact. — Emotional Button (45/100)
Went straight for the 'loving father/mother' and 'beautiful child' to make a tax sound like a personal tragedy. 😭
Exaggerating inheritance tax to 50% for a 'beautiful child'. — Emotional Button (45/100)
Went straight for the 'loving father' and 'beautiful child' to make a tax sound extra evil. Classic emotional manipulation. 😭
The 'loving father' scenario with a 50% inheritance tax — a classic emotional button 😭 — Emotional Button (45/100)
The 'loving father' and 'beautiful child' bit is pure emotional leverage for the tax claim. Pulling heartstrings to make a point. 💔
Exaggerating inheritance tax to 50% on top of federal. Emotional Button. — Emotional Button (45/100)
Went straight for the 'loving father' and 'beautiful child' to make that 50% tax hit harder. Classic emotional manipulation 😭
Exaggerating the tax burden to claim people are left with 'nothing,' then calling it 'common sense.' — Loaded Language (45/100)
Claimed 'you're leaving him nothing' after taxes, then tried to pass it off as 'common sense.' That's a leap. 🤡
Claims 50% state tax + federal tax leaves 'nothing' — ignoring the math and other factors 🤡 — Missing Context (45/100)
Saying 50% state tax + federal tax means 'leaving him nothing' is a bit dramatic. It's not 100% gone, chief. 🙄
Claiming high taxes leave heirs 'nothing' and force people to leave. Exaggeration and Missing Context. — Missing Context (45/100)
Said 'leaving him nothing' after a 50% tax, conveniently forgetting the other 50% still exists. Math is hard, I guess 🤡
Claiming high taxes leave heirs 'nothing' and force people to leave, ignoring actual tax structures. — Missing Context (45/100)
Claiming 'you're leaving him nothing' after a 50% tax is a bit dramatic. There are still other 50% left, chief. 🤡
Calling a complex economic issue 'common sense' to simplify and push a narrative. Loaded Language. — Loaded Language (45/100)
Slapped 'common sense' on it to shut down any debate. Because if you disagree, you must be dumb, right? 🙄
Reiterating the 90% tax claim and linking it to people leaving. Volume Game. — Volume Game (45/100)
Doubled down on the '90% of taxes' claim like saying it twice makes it true. Still zero receipts, though 💀
Repeats the '90% of taxes' claim, doubling down without evidence 🚩 — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Still pushing that '90% of taxes' number like it's gospel, even after saying it once. Repetition doesn't make it true. 🤷♀️
Repeating the '90% of taxes' claim, reinforcing it without new evidence. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Doubled down on the '90% of taxes' number. Repetition doesn't make it true, just louder. 📢
Reiterating the 90% tax claim and expanding the exodus to California. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Doubled down on the '90% of taxes' claim without a single shred of evidence. Repetition doesn't make it true. 🚩
Reiterating the 90% tax claim and expanding the 'leaving' narrative. Confidence Mismatch. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Doubled down on the '90% of taxes' and added California for good measure. Still no receipts, just vibes 🤡
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →