the media when the criminal is finally a white guy #shorts #comedy #funny

Credibility score: 40/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.

BSmeter analyzed "the media when the criminal is finally a white guy #shorts #comedy #funny" and rated it 40/100 for credibility (a BS score of 60/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-10-22. Its weakest claim — "Hypothesizes a plane hijacking scenario, then pretends it's 'unprecedented' and 'could have been anyone.'" — scored 20/100 and was flagged as straw man. 4 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.

Of 4 claims analyzed: 2 scored under 40, 1 between 40 and 69, and 1 at 70 or above.

Claims analyzed

They're setting up the classic media bias trope — knowing one name, not the other. It's a setup, not a claim. 😈 — No Frame (75/100)

At 0:00

They're laying the groundwork for the joke, establishing the premise of selective information. It's a narrative device. 😈

Why this score: This whole exchange is a comedic setup. The 'news reporter' character is intentionally withholding information to illustrate a point about media bias, not making a factual claim about a specific incident. It's a performance. 🎭

Original quote: “Hey, did you hear about that plane? >> Oh, yes. There was a co-pilot who attacked the pilot and then tried to fly the plane into the ground. >> Yeah, do you know who did it? >> Yes, we know the name of the pilot. >> it? >> The pilot who was attacked, his name was >> is the one who attacked the…”

The 'news' character claims to 'only report facts' while clearly omitting one. That's the joke, mortals. 💀 — Missing Context (45/100)

At 0:21

The 'news' character says they 'only report facts' but conveniently leaves out the name of the perpetrator. That's the entire point of the sketch. 😈

Why this score: This is the punchline of the setup. The 'news' character's refusal to 'speculate' or name the perpetrator, despite knowing the other pilot's name, is meant to highlight perceived media hypocrisy regarding race and crime reporting. It's a comedic exaggeration of a common criticism. 🤡

Original quote: “Except for >> Except for the other one, yeah. >> Can you maybe speculate on who he was? >> Nope. We're the news. We only report facts.”

Sources: Characters in InfoWars (The Onion) - TV Tropes, r/unpopularopinion on Reddit: News should be a dry recitation of facts. If it isn't, then it's an opinion intended to stir your emotions into clouding your judgement, Intrepid Reporter - TV Tropes

Hypothesizes a plane hijacking scenario, then pretends it's 'unprecedented' and 'could have been anyone.' — Straw Man (20/100)

At 0:30

He sets up a scenario, then immediately acts like it's a mystery, ignoring the obvious historical parallel. That's not a guess, that's a setup. 💀

Why this score: The speaker describes a scenario that directly mirrors the 9/11 attacks, then feigns ignorance by calling it 'unprecedented' and suggesting the perpetrator 'could have been anyone.' This is a classic straw man, creating a false premise of ambiguity to then highlight a perceived media bias when the 'reveal' comes. He's not speculating; he's leading the witness.

Original quote: “Okay, I'm going to try to speculate. A plane from the Middle East going to Israel was hijacked by a person, and that person tried to crash the plane killing hundreds or thousands. Really unprecedented. It could have been anyone.”

Sources: September 11, 2001 Revisited: Act IV, Part VI | The Center for an Informed America, r/HistoryWhatIf on Reddit: I merely read Osama had intended ten planes for 911. History what if ten got hijacked successfully what would have happened?, Aircraft hijacking | Disasters Wiki | Fandom

Describes a 'serial carjacker' with highly specific, racially coded descriptors, then pretends it 'could be any type of person.' — Straw Man (20/100)

At 0:49

He paints a picture with every racial stereotype in the book, then pretends it's a mystery. That's not a hint, that's a caricature. 😈

Why this score: The speaker provides a series of highly specific, racially charged descriptors for a hypothetical carjacker ('6'6, likes basketball, fried chicken, fat white woman, and has an apostrophe in his name'). He then sarcastically asks if the listener can guess who it is, and the other person plays along by saying 'Really could be any type of person.' This is a straw man argument, constructing a stereotypical image to then mock the idea that media would avoid racial profiling, while simultaneously engaging in it. It's a setup to critique perceived media bias by first creating an exaggerated, biased…

Original quote: “What? There's also a serial carjacker. Apparently, there's this guy going around South Side Chicago stealing cars and robbing convenience stores. Oh, wow. Really? Who's doing it? You don't know? Can you guess? Well, all we know is that he's 6'6, likes basketball, fried chicken, fat white woman, and…”

Sources: carjacker — definition, examples, related words and more at Wordnik, Deconstructing racial code words | Law & Society Review | Cambridge Core

See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →