I can't believe this is real..
Credibility score: 44/100 β Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "I can't believe this is real.." and rated it 44/100 for credibility (a BS score of 56/100 β mixed credibility), on 2026-06-16. Its weakest claim β "$4M IRS payment partly funds transgender surgeries" β scored 30/100 and was flagged as sketchy. 8 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 8 claims analyzed: 3 scored under 40, 5 between 40 and 69, and 0 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Video opens with a highlight reel preview β Just Vibes (50/100)
At 0:00
Teaser drops 'free tits on Medicaid' and 'my body is priceless' in one go β already setting the rage bait tone π₯
Why this score: The opening 30 seconds is a rapid montage of the core soundbites the video will use. No individual claims are being made yet β it's pure preview material designed to hook viewers with the most inflammatory lines.
Original quote: β[0:00] Colorado Medicaid covers gender [0:02] transition surgeries for adults draws [0:04] taxpayer backlash. ... [0:30] Why? Cuz my body is priceless. No, howβ
$4M IRS payment partly funds transgender surgeries β Sketchy (30/100)
At 0:30
Dude claims his $4M IRS check is literally buying boobs β that's not how federal taxes work even a little bit π€‘
Why this score: Federal taxes go into the general fund; no line-item for Colorado procedures
- Even if Colorado had the policy, one person's federal payment isn't earmarked for state programs
- The $4M figure itself is presented with zero receipts or context
Original quote: βnot cuz I just wrote a $4 million check the other day to the IRS. If that's paying for literal titties, what are we doing?β
Only solution to democracy's 'death spiral' is stripping voting rights β Opinion (50/100)
At 2:33
Wants to end democracy to save democracy β the math ain't mathing π
Why this score: Classic authoritarian logic dressed as concern. Key issues:
- No mechanism given for who keeps power after votes are gone
- Ignores every historical example where removing voting rights led to worse outcomes
- Treats 'populism' as a disease rather than voters reacting to real problems
Original quote: βIt's only going to get worse until we take away people's right to vote. That's the only thing that can save us.β
Bottom 50% pay just 1% of federal taxes β OK (65/100)
At 2:44
Roughly true on income taxes alone β but leaves out payroll, sales, and state taxes that hit lower earners harder
Why this score: Partially accurate but cherry-picked. Key points:
- IRS data shows bottom 50% pay ~3% of federal income taxes, close to the 1% claim
- Payroll taxes and consumption taxes (regressive) are excluded from this stat
- Doesn't address why low earners pay little income tax: they earn little income
Original quote: βthe bottom 50% of the population only contributes 1% to the federal taxesβ
Taxpayers are forced to pay for trans surgeries and hormones β Sketchy (35/100)
At 2:52
Medicaid covers some gender care in certain states β but 'we pay for your boobs' is pure rage-bait exaggeration
Why this score: Overstates the scope. Key issues:
- Federal law bans Medicaid funding for most transition surgeries
- Some state Medicaid programs cover hormones/surgery; others explicitly don't
- Most transition costs are paid privately or through employer insurance, not direct taxpayer dollars
Original quote: βwe give everything new. Now we pay for your boobs. What else do we pay for? What else did we pay? Do we pay for your hormones?β
Claims Colorado won't pay for implants past A cup size β Sketchy (30/100)
At 4:30
Says there's a strict A-cup cutoff for state coverage β sounds made up on the spot with zero policy link.
Why this score: Specific cutoff rule asserted with no source. Issues:
- No Colorado Medicaid or state policy document establishes an A-cup maximum for coverage
- The "beer bigger" phrasing is casual and imprecise, undermining credibility
- This detail appears invented to fit the narrative rather than drawn from actual eligibility criteria
Original quote: βif you get if you get bigger than an A cup like a beer bigger, they won't pay for it. But because I'm a skinny legend, I only got likeβ
Claims Colorado covers breast implants for trans patients but not biological women β Dubious (45/100)
At 6:30
Said Colorado pays for trans boob jobs but not cis women β zero evidence this policy exists π
Why this score: No public records support this Colorado policy distinction. Key issues:
- Colorado Medicaid covers some gender-affirming surgeries under specific criteria
- Standard breast augmentation for cis women is considered cosmetic and not covered
- No evidence shows trans patients receive coverage for purely cosmetic size upgrades
Original quote: βpaying for biological women's boob jobs for the same boob size? I mean, how is this not discrimination, by the way?β
Would rather vote neocon warmongers than fund trans surgeries with taxes β Opinion (50/100)
At 8:30
Pure political hyperbole β he'd literally resurrect Dick Cheney over this π
Why this score: Strong opinion, not a factual claim.
- Speaker frames tax-funded surgeries as total dealbreaker
- No data offered on actual federal spending levels
- Hyperbolic preference stated for dramatic effect
Original quote: βBy the way, this is the reason why I will never vote for a Democrat. I will vote for the most neocon warmonger [__] uh blood, death, and thunder all around the world Republican every single day of the week before I vote for a single cent of my money to be spent on transgender boob jobs.β
See the full analysis with timestamps β