I Confronted the Most Famous Communist Philosopher LIVE on Piers Morgan (Slavoj Zizek)

Video opens with a highlight reel preview — Just Vibes (50/100)

At 0:00

Bold preview — let's see if the video delivers on these promises.

Why this score: Introductory montage used as a teaser. - Sets the stage for a confrontation between the speaker and Slavoj Žižek. - Introduces the central conflict regarding Donald Trump's political classification.

Original quote: “I was invited on to Pierce Morgan to challenge Slavo Xjek who's considered to be one of the most dangerous philosophers in the west... He's claiming that Trump is a form of fascist.”

The speaker challenges Žižek's self-identification as a communist, citing that communism has led to the death of 100 million people. — Solid (75/100)

At 0:30

That 100 million figure? It's often cited, but it's a hot potato of a statistic, wildly debated. 🙄

Why this score: Estimates for deaths under 20th-century communist regimes vary significantly, from 10-20 million to 148 million. The 100 million figure was popularized by 'The Black Book of Communism' but its methodology has been criticized. However, the scale of mass deaths (tens of millions) is broadly accepted.

Original quote: “he describes himself openly as a communist when communism has led to the death of a 100 million people. Why are you comfortable describing yourself as a communist when over 100 million people have died under communism?”

Piers Morgan asserts that Donald Trump's actions have not resembled those of Mussolini. — Opinion (60/100)

At 0:49

Ah, the classic 'Trump isn't Mussolini' argument. Piers Morgan *loves* to make that distinction. 🤷‍♂️

Why this score: This statement reflects Piers Morgan's consistent stance in debates with Slavoj Žižek. Morgan frequently distinguishes between Trump's rhetoric and the historical actions of figures like Mussolini to argue against labeling Trump a 'fascist'. Žižek, conversely, often uses a broader concept of 'soft fascism' that he applies to Trump-era politics.

Original quote: “But in terms of his actions, which is how I always prefer to judge Trump, he hasn't behaved like Mussolini, has he? No, absolutely not. But you know what they I absolutely agree here. That's why I emphasized that it's just one of the verses.”

The speaker argues that creating multiple versions of fascism leads to over-labeling and criticizes Slavoj Žižek for this, also claiming Žižek isn't a 'real' communist. — Sketchy (35/100)

At 1:49

Calling Žižek not 'really' a communist completely ignores his entire well-documented, if convoluted, philosophical explanation. 💀

Why this score: The 'slippery slope' argument about diluting the term 'fascism' is a common point made by Piers Morgan in his debates with Žižek. However, the assertion that Žižek isn't 'really' a communist misrepresents his position. Žižek explicitly identifies as a communist but *rejects* 20th-century communism as a 'total failure' and a 'catastrophe,' defining communism differently to signal a genuine step outside the existing order. He's even been called a 'moderately conservative communist'.

Original quote: “but do we get into a slippery slope here Savo and I say this with great respect but once you start sort of having all sorts of different versions of fascism it's very easy to then call pretty much everyone a fascist that you don't like. That is the flaw and that is what Slavoy is doing. I also…”

The speaker cites an anecdote where someone called Trump a fascist for trying to get Jimmy Kimmel pulled off air, then discusses if popular understanding can redefine ideologies, noting postmodernists would say yes. — Verified (90/100)

At 2:25

Actually reporting correctly on what some people claim and the philosophical reasoning behind it. Shocking. ✅

Why this score: Jimmy Kimmel's show was indeed suspended in September 2025 after he made critical comments about Donald Trump, prompting Trump's public criticism. Kimmel later used his 'alternative Christmas message' in December 2025 to criticize Trump and warned about 'tyranny' and fascism, directly linking Trump's actions to the rise of fascism. The concept of ideologies and language morphing and changing due to popular understanding aligns with postmodernist thought, which emphasizes the social construction of meaning and skepticism towards fixed definitions.

Original quote: “I was just having this conversation yesterday... where the person claims, well, there are so many people that are accepting this new definition that just what makes Trump a fascist? Well, he's trying to get Jimmy Kimmel pulled off the air. That that's what makes him fascist... They said, 'Well,…”

Speaker defines fascism as 'authoritarian pursuit of national purity through violence' and claims US Founding Fathers anticipated it. — Sketchy (35/100)

At 2:30

A partial definition, sure, but the Founding Fathers anticipating fascism? That's quite a leap. 🤦‍♂️🗓️

Why this score: Fascism is a complex ideology characterized by authoritarian nationalism, militarism, and the suppression of opposition [2, 5, 6]. While 'national purity through violence' describes aspects of certain fascist regimes (e.g., Nazism), it's an incomplete definition for fascism broadly [2, 4, 17]. Claiming the US Founding Fathers 'anticipated' an ideology that only emerged in the early 20th century is anachronistic and highly unlikely [2, 3, 5].

Original quote: “But if we're actually looking at the original definition, the authoritarian pursuit of national purity through violence, I would argue that our founding fathers were so genius in the way they were able to anticipate this ideology before it was ever articulated. It's as though it's always existed…”

Sources: What is Fascism? - American Library Association, Founding Fathers' Warnings - U.S. Constitution

Žižek suggests that even non-communists like Trump and Boris Johnson have acted in a 'communist way.' — Opinion (50/100)

At 4:30

Calling Trump and Boris 'communist-like' is a... take. Definitely a Žižek take. 🤔

Why this score: This is Žižek's *interpretive analysis* of political behavior, not a factual claim that can be verified or refuted with data. It reflects his unique philosophical lens on how certain power dynamics or responses to crises can align with aspects of communist thought, regardless of official ideology.

Original quote: “my solution is not of course what we knew as communism but I think and I'm not even very original here that the problems we are facing look co there I think Trump and Boris Johnson certainly not communists acted almost in a communist way. >> I mean, we can just make these things up. This is going…”

Žižek claims China, with communists in power, follows market rules more faithfully than Russia or the US, acting as an example of communism leading to true capitalism. — Sketchy (35/100)

At 6:30

Žižek implying China's 'communists' are better capitalists than the US or Russia is... a stretch. Very provocative. 🤯🚩

Why this score: Žižek's statement that Chinese communists 'follow more faithfully market rules definitely than Russia or United States' and implies this leads to 'true capitalism' is a highly contentious and provocative philosophical argument rather than a straightforward factual claim. While China has adopted market-oriented reforms, many scholars, and even Žižek himself in other contexts, describe its system as 'authoritarian capitalism' or 'state capitalism,' not 'true capitalism' derived from communism. The argument that China's current economic model is a direct result of its communist party *leading to…

Original quote: “China precisely because communists are in power there. But communists who learned the lesson follows more faithfully market rules definitely than Russia or United States. And then he points to China as an example as though communism leads to true capitalism. It's confusing stuff. >> China is for me…”

Claims 50 million people died due to communist ideology — Solid (80/100)

At 8:30

Actually conservative estimate ✅

Why this score: Historically supported. Estimates for deaths under 20th-century communist regimes (USSR, China, Cambodia) typically range from 50 million to over 100 million due to famine, purges, and forced labor.

Original quote: “The ideology of communism has been detrimental there. And that's where 50 million people died as a result.”

Argues communism requires the abolition of private property — Verified (95/100)

At 8:46

Textbook definition 👌

Why this score: Core tenet. The abolition of private property (means of production) is the central pillar of Marxist and communist theory.

Original quote: “what makes you a communist if you if you're not discussing the inability to control or own private property.”

Claims Žižek says he doesn't like Marxism while advocating for Marx — Just Vibes (50/100)

At 8:57

Classic Zizek—contradicting himself is his entire brand 🌀

Why this score: Philosophical nuance. Žižek often critiques the *application* of Marxism or its rigid dogmas while remaining a neo-Marxist; the speaker interprets this as a contradiction.

Original quote: “He started to go into, "Well, what I'm advocating is more along the lines of what Karl Marx was discussing... He responded by claiming, "I don't like Marxism."”