They're trying to destroy his life..
Credibility score: 49/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
Claims analyzed
Jury ordered Meta and YouTube to pay millions for promoting apps that cause mental health issues — Dubious (35/100)
No actual verdict named, no case number, no date — just vibes and a Morgan & Morgan ad 💀
Claims he never pushed for new laws, just proper enforcement of existing ones — Opinion (50/100)
Classic 'I'm not asking for new rules' while literally describing how the old ones should crush people 💀
Describes disorderly conduct statute as very broad and applicable here — OK (65/100)
The statute text he read is real — the 'serves no legitimate purpose' bit is genuinely that vague on paper
Says US has always had laws against 'acting like an animal in public' — Dubious (40/100)
Bro really said 'acting like an animal' is a crime — that's not a legal standard, that's just his feelings 😭
Claims disorderly conduct is very common and covers unreasonable noise and fighting — Solid (80/100)
Finally something accurate — disorderly conduct really is one of the most used misdemeanor charges across the US
Wants a tyrant to jail people for using phone speakers in public — Opinion (50/100)
Bro literally said he wants a dictator who throws you in jail for a month over Bluetooth speakers 💀
Praises court for allowing digital appearance in this case — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it "very good" that the court let him appear online — basic tech that most places figured out years ago
Lesser charges are separate from the RICO case — OK (60/100)
Technically true right now — but the next 20 seconds literally explain how those "separate" charges can still feed the RICO 🔥
Lesser charges can become foundation for bigger RICO charges — Opinion (50/100)
Classic prosecutor move and everyone in the comments is nodding like it's obvious 💀
Prosecutors might try to trick defendants — Opinion (50/100)
No shit — that's literally their job description 😭
Speaker claims he already considered not talking to Ben — Opinion (50/100)
Yeah we heard you the first time, bro — no need to pat yourself on the back for basic decency 💀
Claims July 6 hearing will be simple with little controversy — Opinion (50/100)
Calling a court hearing 'very simple' when someone's facing serious charges is some next-level optimism 😭
Claims Ben faces very serious charges requiring a lawyer — Opinion (50/100)
Finally some actual sense — telling someone facing charges to get a lawyer isn't exactly a hot take though 🤷♂️
Claims he's representing Ben's 'estate' against the US as corporations — BS (5/100)
Sovereign citizen word salad — no legal system recognizes 'corporation of the United States' bullshit 💀
Wants 'the same energy' as the people suing Ben over Lego — Opinion (50/100)
Wants the same obsessive legal harassment energy directed at Lego thieves — that's not the flex he thinks it is 😭
Doesn't care if Ben made a 'technical mistake' — only cares who's right — Opinion (50/100)
Dismisses legal technicalities as irrelevant — that's how you end up in actual legal trouble 🧱
Calls this the biggest corporate suicide ever, then admits it's not — Opinion (50/100)
Bro said 'biggest corporate suicide ever' then immediately walked it back — pick a lane 💀
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →