OpenAI responds to the math authorship dispute
Credibility score: 45/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "OpenAI responds to the math authorship dispute" and rated it 45/100 for credibility (a BS score of 55/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-09-28. Its weakest claim — "Claims Sebastian Bubeck shared receipts to prove he never asked for Levent's removal" — scored 45/100 and was flagged as missing context. 3 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Claims Sebastian Bubeck shared receipts to prove he never asked for Levent's removal — Missing Context (45/100)
Using 'receipts' as a shield to avoid accountability — we haven't seen the actual text 📜
Uses personal emotional weight to justify the difficulty of the dispute — Emotional Button (45/100)
Pivot to 'incredibly difficult' to make a corporate dispute feel like a human drama 🎭
Claiming Levent's refusal to attend meetings as a point of contention — Missing Context (45/100)
Painting a picture of conflict without showing the other side's reason for staying away 🎭
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →