Freedom to protest is a fundamental right, but every time the ruling party wants to pass…
Credibility score: 39/100 — Low Credibility. High BS alert! Many claims lack evidence or are misleading.
BSmeter analyzed "Freedom to protest is a fundamental right, but every time the ruling party wants to pass…" and rated it 39/100 for credibility (a BS score of 61/100 — low credibility), on 2026-10-30. Its weakest claim — "Warns that protesting will 'literally' destroy the nation's image" — scored 20/100 and was flagged as false equivalence. 4 claims were checked against the post's caption and on-screen text. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the post's text, not independent human verification.
Of 4 claims analyzed: 1 scored under 40, 3 between 40 and 69, and 0 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Claims opposition funding comes from abroad to justify FCR via assumption — Missing Context (45/100)
Using 'we presume' to build a case for FCR is bold. That's not an argument, it's a guess with an agenda 💀
Why this score: The speaker relies on the assumption of foreign funding to justify a specific regulatory outcome (FCR) without providing actual financial data or transparency.
Original quote: “The opposition comes and starts a protest and it is happening since ages and that the funding they get is from Outer countries we presume so it’s very important this FCR happens so these peoples funding stops.”
Dismissing protest in favor of the judiciary as a way to counter power — False Equivalence (45/100)
Telling people to stop protesting and just use the courts is a massive simplification of political power 🚩
Why this score: The speaker equates the act of protesting with a lack of judicial respect, creating a false dichotomy between street-level activism and formal legal systems.
Original quote: “Protesting is not the solution for everything. There is a reason why court is there. There is a working judicial system in our country just because you have influence and power.”
Warns that protesting will 'literally' destroy the nation's image — False Equivalence (20/100)
Equating a protest to 'bringing down the whole country' is some wild hyperbole 💀
Why this score: They are equating the act of civil expression with total national collapse and image destruction, which is a massive leap in logic.
Original quote: “If you start protesting, you can literally bring down the whole country and spoil the image of the country”
Sources: r/TrueUnpopularOpinion on Reddit: Protests that disrupt ordinary people’s lives are anti-democratic, Protect the Protest, r/changemyview on Reddit: CMV: protests are supposed to disrupt order.
Commands 'normal' citizens to avoid supporting protesters — Emotional Button (45/100)
Labeling people 'normal' to create an 'us vs them' trap 😈
Why this score: The speaker uses the emotional weight of 'normal citizens' to create a boundary, making protest-support seem like an elitist or radical deviation.
Original quote: “and we as normal Indian citizens should not support these kind of people.”
See the full analysis with sources →