Sanders Sides INCORRECT QUOTES! - Vol. 7 | Thomas Sanders
Credibility score: 49/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "Sanders Sides INCORRECT QUOTES! - Vol. 7 | Thomas Sanders" and rated it 49/100 for credibility (a BS score of 51/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-08-22. Its weakest claim — "Compares emotional craving to hard drugs, then gets a brutal reality check. 💀" — scored 20/100 and was flagged as false equivalence. 24 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 24 claims analyzed: 1 scored under 40, 23 between 40 and 69, and 0 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Video opens with a highlight reel preview of various character interactions and comedic bits. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 0:04
A rapid-fire montage of character quips and absurd situations — pure entertainment, no claims to dissect. 😈
Why this score: This is a compilation of comedic 'incorrect quotes' attributed to fictional characters. It's designed for humor and character interaction, not to present factual claims or persuasive arguments. It's just a bit of fun, mortal.
Original quote: “[0:04] Care for an apple?
[0:07] >> Do you take us for idiots? We'd never
[0:10] trust food from someone like you.
[0:13] >> Hey, LOOK, APPLE.
[0:14] >> PATTON!
[0:16] >> WHAT DO YOU HAVE?
[0:17] >> A KNIFE.
[0:18] >> NO.
[0:19] >> UGH, WHY DO I FEEL TERRIBLE? Coffee is
[0:21] not a meal.
[0:22] >>…”
The whole setup is just a comedic bit playing on wordplay and character dynamics. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 0:30
They're just riffing, mortal. It's a skit, not a debate. No real claims, just a setup for a punchline. 😈
Why this score: This entire segment is clearly a comedic exchange between characters, designed for entertainment. There are no factual claims being made, only humorous dialogue and character interaction. It's a performance, not an argument. What did you expect, a culinary exposé? 🔥
Original quote: “>> SO, WHAT'S FOR DINNER? >> I CAN'T tell you, it's a surprise. >> Is it soup? >> I suppose it could be. >> Please, enough with the soup puns. >> Wow, you're super mean. >> Stop. >> It's tacos? Fits like a glove. It's a shoe, stupid. IT'S AN EXPRESSION, DUMBASS.”
A sudden, aggressive outburst against a lake, purely for comedic effect. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 0:52
From 'beautiful evening' to 'fuck that lake' in a heartbeat. That's not a mood swing, mortal, that's a joke. 💀
Why this score: This is a classic comedic juxtaposition. One character expresses appreciation for the evening, immediately followed by another's nonsensical, aggressive declaration towards a body of water. It's an absurd, character-driven moment meant to be funny, not taken literally. It's just a bit, nothing more. 🔥
Original quote: “>> What a beautiful evening. >> Take that, you [ __ ] lake.”
A ridiculous escalation of wordplay, ending in an absurd, complex word. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 1:03
From 'A' to 'biostratigraphic' in four steps. That's not how language works, mortal. That's how comedy works. 😈
Why this score: This is a clear example of a comedic 'escalation' bit. It starts with simple word building and then takes an abrupt, nonsensical leap to a highly complex, unrelated word for a punchline. It's a play on expectations and absurdity, not a serious linguistic lesson. It's just a joke, plain and simple. 💀
Original quote: “>> I will put A down to make A. >> Mhm. >> I will add on to your A to make at. >> Mhm. >> I will add on to your at to make rat. >> Mhm. >> I will add on to your rat to MAKE BIOSTRATIGRAPHIC.”
A character's naive request for a toy, followed by a quick, awkward correction. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 1:24
From 'kids meal toy' to 'adult toy' in one breath. That's not a logical leap, mortal, that's a comedic misstep. 😈
Why this score: This is a classic comedic moment of a character making an innocent, slightly childish request, being called out for it, and then attempting a quick, awkward save that only makes it funnier. It's entirely character-driven humor, not a claim to be fact-checked. Just a bit. 🔥
Original quote: “>> OH, WAIT, I FORGOT to ask for a kids meal toy. >> You're not a kid. >> Ooh, yeah. An adult toy, then. >> Excuse me. >> Wait, no.”
A literal interpretation of an idiom, met with an exasperated correction. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 1:42
Taking 'fits like a glove' literally. Mortal, that's not a misunderstanding — that's a setup for a punchline. 💀
Why this score: This is a common comedic trope where one character misunderstands or deliberately misinterprets an idiom, leading to another character's frustrated correction. It's a play on literal versus figurative language, purely for humor. No real claim, just a joke. 🔥
Original quote: “>> Fits like a glove. >> It's a shoe, stupid. IT'S AN EXPRESSION, DUMBASS.”
A comedic accusation and denial, playing on character dynamics. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 1:47
Blaming Virgil for a stomach ache. That's not a medical diagnosis, mortal, that's a character bit. 😈
Why this score: This is a humorous exchange based on established character dynamics within the Sanders Sides universe, where Virgil is often associated with negative emotions or outcomes. It's a comedic accusation and denial, not a serious claim about causation. It's just a joke. 💀
Original quote: “>> THOMAS, WHAT'S WRONG? >> MY STOMACH HURTS. >> VIRGIL, STOP making his stomach hurt. >> Why do you assume it's me? >> Who else would it be?”
A humorous, naive question about the nature of expiration dates. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 1:53
Asking if an expiration date is a 'fun fact.' Mortal, that's not curiosity — that's a setup for a comedic beat. 😈
Why this score: This question is clearly posed for comedic effect, playing on a character's naivety or deliberate obtuseness regarding a common safety guideline. It's not a serious inquiry into food safety, but rather a humorous line designed to elicit a reaction. It's just a bit. 🔥
Original quote: “>> So, is an expiration date like an actual rule or more like a fun fact?”
A nonsensical question about car mechanics, met with an equally absurd, exasperated answer. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 2:17
Pressing gas and brake for a 'screenshot.' Mortal, that's not how cars work — that's how comedy works. 💀
Why this score: This is a classic comedic exchange where a character asks a ridiculous, mechanically impossible question, and another character responds with an equally absurd, sarcastic answer, highlighting their exasperation. It's purely for humor and character interaction. It's just a joke. 🔥
Original quote: “>> What if I press the gas and the brake at the same time? >> The car takes a screenshot. For the last time, get out.”
Claiming 80% awesome, 20% water, 100% handsome, then doubling down on the math error. Pure comedy. 💀 — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 2:47
The math is hilariously off, and he just rolls with it. That's not a claim, mortal, that's a bit. 😂
Why this score: This is a comedic sketch, not a factual statement. The humor comes from the character confidently presenting percentages that add up to 200%, then using the correction to deliver a punchline. It's a deliberate, funny error.
Original quote: “I'm 80% awesome, 20% water, and 100% handsome. >> That's 200%. >> I'm twice the man you'll ever be. Nailed it.”
A classic misdirection, twisting 'menu' into 'men I please.' Predictable, but still lands. 😈 — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 3:04
The oldest trick in the book, mortal. A simple homophone swap for a cheap laugh. Seen it a million times. 🙄
Why this score: This is a wordplay joke, relying on the similar sound of 'menu' and 'men I please.' It's a comedic device, not a claim to be fact-checked. The humor is in the unexpected, suggestive response.
Original quote: “The men I please is none of your business.”
Drawing a 'fact' from movies and applying it to reality. That's not how physics works, mortal. 🎬 — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 3:22
He's taking movie logic as gospel. Movies are for entertainment, not engineering, you fool. 🤦♂️
Why this score: The character is confidently asserting a 'fact' based solely on cinematic tropes, not real-world physics. Popping the back of a raft would likely hinder, not help, propulsion. It's a comedic exaggeration of misplaced confidence.
Original quote: “Look, you can yell at me all you want, but I've watched enough movies to know popping the back of the raft makes it go faster.”
A tale of childhood betrayal involving shapeshifting and a stabbing. That's a hell of a story, mortal. 🔪 — Personal Story (60/100)
At 3:34
A personal anecdote, wild as hell, but it's his story. I've seen worse betrayals, believe me. 😈
Why this score: This is a character's personal, fantastical anecdote. It's presented as a memory within the fictional universe of the show, not a claim about reality. It's meant to be humorous and dramatic, not fact-checked.
Original quote: “There was one time when we were children, he transformed himself into a puppy, and he knows that I love puppies. So, I went to pick up the puppy to admire it, and he transformed back into himself, and he was like, "Black, it's me!" and he stabbed me. We were eight.”
Threatening death by plane crash for not drinking water, then claiming responsibility. Bold, stupid, but bold. 💀 — Emotional Button (45/100)
At 3:52
He's trying to scare them into submission with a completely unrelated, self-incriminating threat. Classic manipulation. 🚩
Why this score: The character is using a fear tactic, linking a refusal to drink water to a plane crash they supposedly caused. This is an attempt to exert control through intimidation and an absurd, non-sequitur threat, playing on an emotional response rather than logic.
Original quote: “The last person who didn't drink water after I suggested it died. In a plane crash. I'm the one who crashed it. Do not disobey me.”
The 'bofa' joke. A classic setup for a cheesy punchline. I've heard worse, mortal. 🙄 — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 4:00
Oh, the 'bofa' joke. It's a setup, not a claim. Predictable, but it gets a groan. 😂
Why this score: This is a well-known 'gotcha' joke, where 'bofa' is used to set up a pun. It's a comedic interaction, not a statement intended to convey factual information.
Original quote: “Bofa my arms wrapped around you in a loving hug.”
The punchline: an 'escape room' that costs $2,500 is jail. A clever twist on expectations. 😈 — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 4:12
A dark joke, mortal. Twisting the mundane into something grim. I appreciate the effort. 💀
Why this score: This is a comedic punchline. The humor comes from the unexpected, literal interpretation of 'escape room' in the context of a high cost, implying bail or a bribe to get out of jail. It's a play on words and expectations.
Original quote: “What kind of escape room costs $2,500? >> Jail.”
Suggests spaghetti, then gets immediately shut down. Classic comedic rejection. 😈 — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 4:33
One character's absurd suggestion is instantly dismissed by another. A simple, effective comedic beat. 💀
Why this score: This isn't a claim to fact-check, mortal. It's a setup and punchline. The humor comes from the immediate, blunt rejection of a ridiculous idea. It's a character dynamic, not a debate. 🔥
Original quote: “Ooh, put spaghetti in it. >> I am currently taking suggestions from everyone but you.”
Compares emotional craving to hard drugs, then gets a brutal reality check. 💀 — False Equivalence (20/100)
At 5:00
One character tries to be profound, equating emotional need with addiction — then another drops the actual, much worse, drug. 😈
Why this score: Ah, the classic 'my emotional pain is worse than your physical suffering' move. It's a false equivalence, mortal. Wanting love isn't 'the worst drug' when actual, life-destroying drugs exist. The second character's bluntness cuts right through the melodrama. 🔥
Original quote: “The worst drug to crave is wanting to be loved. >> I don't know. Meth is pretty [ __ ] bad.”
Exaggerates a simple pet preference into a deep psychological flaw. Over-the-top condemnation. 🚩 — Loaded Language (45/100)
At 5:14
Turning a hypothetical pet choice into a sign of 'perversion' and a 'ridiculous relationship with power' is pure, unadulterated hyperbole. 😈
Why this score: This is a masterclass in taking a harmless thought experiment and escalating it to a full-blown psychological indictment. 'Sick,' 'disgusting instinct for perverts,' 'play God' — all because someone wants a tiny lion. The language is so loaded it's about to explode, all to make a comedic point. It's not about truth, it's about drama. 🔥
Original quote: “Some people's instinct would be to take something very vicious and make it small and take away its viciousness. I think that is sick. I think that's a disgusting instinct for perverts. Who would want a little lion or tiger or bear in your pocket? Do you want to play God? Do you want to own the…”
Plays on the double meaning of 'frank' for a quick, silly joke. 😈 — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 6:21
A simple pun, misinterpreting 'Can I be frank' as a desire to change one's name. It's a classic comedic misunderstanding. 💀
Why this score: This is just a wordplay gag, mortal. No hidden agenda, no grand deception. Just a character taking a common idiom literally for a laugh. It's light, it's harmless, it's a bit of fun. 🔥
Original quote: “Can I be frank with you all? >> Yeah, sure. But I don't see how changing your name is going to help.”
Classic 'who broke it' escalation — everyone lies until Patton confesses — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 6:30
The bit runs the full paranoia-to-confession arc in under forty seconds — every denial is funnier than the last.
Why this score: This is the entire 'who broke it' meme played straight with Sanders Sides characters. The humor lives in watching the blame ricochet until Patton owns up.
Original quote: “So, who broke it? ... Liar! I DON'T EVEN DRINK VASE WATER. ... OKAY, OKAY. LET'S NOT FIGHT. I broke it.”
Failed safety quiz for literal answer — comedy of pedantry — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 7:30
The joke hinges on taking 'steps' as physical movement instead of protocol — classic wordplay bait-and-switch.
Why this score: It's a deliberate misreading of a safety question for the punchline. No real claim being made, just the joy of the misunderstanding.
Original quote: “I failed my safety training course today... Well, apparently [ __ ] large ones ISN'T AN ACCEPTABLE ANSWER.”
Yelling 'It's Tacos!' out of nowhere — pure, unadulterated chaos for comedic effect. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 10:38
Randomly screaming 'It's Tacos!' — that's not a claim, mortal, that's just a man embracing the absurd. 💀
Why this score: This is a moment of pure comedic relief, likely part of the 'Incorrect Quotes' theme of the video. The sudden, out-of-context yelling of 'It's Tacos!' is meant to be funny and unexpected, not to convey any factual information or persuade the viewer of anything. It's a character moment, a bit of silliness.
Original quote: “Peace out. It's tacos!
Just have
Just him sitting here and YELLING IT'S
TACOS.”
Shouting 'Chocolate!' then immediately remembering the neighbors — a classic comedic self-correction. — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 10:55
Another sudden outburst, then the mortal remembers the real world. A brief, relatable moment of comedic self-awareness. 😈
Why this score: Similar to the 'tacos' moment, this is a comedic beat. The speaker's sudden, loud exclamation of 'Chocolate!' followed by the immediate, slightly embarrassed realization that they 'have neighbors' creates a humorous, relatable scenario. It's a performance, a joke, not a claim to be fact-checked or a manipulative framing device.
Original quote: “CHOCOLATE!
OKAY, I HAVE NEIGHBORS.
I HAVE NEIGHBORS.”
See the full analysis with timestamps →