Women have gone insane..
Credibility score: 45/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "Women have gone insane.." and rated it 45/100 for credibility (a BS score of 55/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-05. Its weakest claim — "DEI hiring is 94% non-white, only 6% white" — scored 15/100 and was flagged as bs. 30 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Video opens with a highlight reel preview — Just Vibes (50/100)
Teaser montage of angry dating stories and social media blame — sets up the whole rant before any evidence appears.
Young women 35-50% positive on men vs men's 72% on women — Dubious (40/100)
Exact percentages dropped with no poll link or date — can't verify the numbers.
Only 35% of women under 25 view men positively — Unverifiable (50/100)
Pulled the 35% number with zero source mentioned — no poll, study, or link attached.
Under-25 women believe the system is stacked against them — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it the 'COVID generation' framing a worldview as fact — that's just vibes, not data.
60% won't date Gaza disagreers, 75% won't date Trump disagreers — Unverifiable (50/100)
Threw out 6-in-10 and 3-out-of-4 dating stats with zero source — could be real, could be made up on the spot.
Super liberal women's birth rates are 0.6-0.8, causing self-extinction — Sketchy (25/100)
Said birth rates are '6 or 8' — that's not how fertility rates work, and no data backs the extinction claim.
This chat is the main base of operations for all internet incels — Opinion (50/100)
Calling his own audience the 'main base of operations' for incels — bold self-own or just farming engagement?
Young educated white women hold strongest negative views on careers and property — OK (55/100)
Repeats the survey finding but gives no source or sample size.
No research needed — speaker already knew young women lean communist — Opinion (50/100)
Claims personal knowledge beats actual polling data.
Says grooming by grown men on Instagram makes girls hate men — Opinion (50/100)
Personal theory linking DMs to widespread man-hate — no data, just vibes.
Female grads more positive on communism, feminism, socialism than non-grads — Dubious (40/100)
Lists the finding but never names the actual study or year.
Claims he was groomed on MSN at age nine — Personal Story (50/100)
His own childhood story — can't verify, but it's his lived experience.
Tumblr and online spaces multiplied anti-men messaging for underage girls — Opinion (50/100)
Blames Tumblr-era content plus DMs for scaling up resentment — still just his read.
White women more likely than minorities to call the country racist — Dubious (35/100)
Reverses typical polling pattern without showing any source.
Says any girl online as a minor will confirm this happens — Opinion (50/100)
Appeals to universal female experience — sweeping generalization with zero sourcing.
Grooming at 15 permanently warps women via bonsai-like damage and cycle of abuse — Opinion (50/100)
Framing grooming as inevitable bonsai-level reprogramming for every girl who meets an older guy — zero data, just the metaphor.
Says online creeps and pedos make girls hate all men — Opinion (50/100)
This is a causal leap — exposure to creeps doesn't automatically equal hating every man.
Uses old analogy to claim women are more selective than men in sex — Opinion (50/100)
The 'master key vs faulty lock' line is just a recycled incel slogan dressed as biology.
Chinese billionaire paid 100 kids to be born in US for citizenship fraud — Sketchy (35/100)
No name, no court record, no news hit — sounds like a viral rumor that never got sourced.
Women follow group consensus over rational thinking as a literal fact — Opinion (50/100)
Called it 'a literal fact' while admitting zero sources — that's just his opinion dressed up.
Twitter staff photos changed from romance novel club to Warhammer 40k after Musk — Dubious (35/100)
Speaker admits "There's no image of this" then describes the exact comparison — can't fact-check what isn't shown.
Universities force equal gender participation in lucrative fields via artificial programs — Opinion (50/100)
Calls programs 'artificial' without naming which ones — just vibes about fairness.
Women only got into college via systematic advantages and would drop back without them — Opinion (50/100)
Calls affirmative action the sole reason women reach 'par' — zero data on actual admission stats.
Quotes that progress comes only from heretics and rebels — Opinion (50/100)
Just dropped a quote like it's self-evident truth — no context on why this specific line fits the rant.
NEETs are mostly men who sit online all day — Opinion (50/100)
NEET is literally gender-neutral — she says so herself two seconds later.
Married single-income families deserve bigger tax breaks than Somali welfare fraud cases in Minnesota — Opinion (50/100)
Compares two unrelated policy targets with no numbers — just vibes about who deserves the bigger handout
Calling capitalism poisonous for valuing people by money — Opinion (50/100)
Capitalism measures output, not 'worth' — speaker conflates the two.
OnlyFans creators get surgery, look like Jigsaw, then have breakdowns at 29 — Sketchy (30/100)
Jigsaw comparison is wild — no evidence most creators end up there.
DEI hiring is 94% non-white, only 6% white — BS (15/100)
Pulled a 94% number with zero source — sounds like a single company's internal stat turned into a national claim
1 in 6 hiring managers told to stop hiring white men — BS (15/100)
No data, study, or source given for that 1-in-6 number — just dropped it cold.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →