Who Really Controls the Internet?
Credibility score: 32/100 — Low Credibility. High BS alert! Many claims lack evidence or are misleading.
BSmeter analyzed "Who Really Controls the Internet?" and rated it 32/100 for credibility (a BS score of 68/100 — low credibility), on 2026-06-29. Its weakest claim — "Claims activists "manufacture conspiracies" and call people "Nazi" for not complying, using a straw man." — scored 20/100 and was flagged as straw man. 13 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Claims we're experiencing the "highest and biggest level of censorship" between 2014-2024, based on personal experience. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Declaring "highest and biggest level of censorship" based on personal feeling isn't exactly a data-driven analysis, is it? 💀
Speaker frames internet control as an "unholy trinity" of media, capitalism, and activism. — Loaded Language (45/100)
Calling it an "unholy trinity" right off the bat? That's not analysis, that's setting the mood for a conspiracy theory. 😈
Attributing 'woke era' origins to 2010-2014, not COVID. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Calling the 'woke era' a 'disease' and pinpointing its start to 2010-2014 with such certainty is a bold take. Like, where's the diagnostic report? 🦠
Brand friendly means left-leaning, and companies cowtow to this group because they're good at 'institutional capture' — not because they're the majority. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Connects 'brand friendly' to 'left-leaning' and 'institutional capture' with zero actual evidence. Just vibes and a big leap. 🤡
Claims advertisers changed rules for money, not conscience, with 'zero' probability of other reasons. — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Declares the probability is 'zero' that companies grew a conscience. That's a bold claim for something so subjective. 💀
Claims activists "manufacture conspiracies" and call people "Nazi" for not complying, using a straw man. — Straw Man (20/100)
Suggesting that disagreeing automatically makes you a 'Nazi' is a bit of a leap — simplifying complex arguments into a cartoon villain 🤡.
Compares pride, Palestine, and trans flags to 'coexist bumper stickers' as mere social accessories. — False Equivalence (20/100)
Lumping all advocacy flags with 'coexist bumper stickers' as just 'social accessories' is a wild oversimplification. Some of those flags represent actual movements, not just vibes. 🚩
Claims Elon Musk's Twitter purchase 'unlocked everybody's freedom of speech' and shifted discourse from gender to 'which race is the best race.' — False Equivalence (20/100)
Comparing 'not being able to say there are two genders' to 'only talking about which race is the best race' is a wild, unhinged pivot. That's not a shift, that's a fever dream. 💀
Censorship is about money, not social justice, citing 4chan and Twitter as examples. — False Equivalence (20/100)
Comparing 4chan to Twitter/Rumble as if they're all the same kind of 'non-ad-based' platform is a stretch. One's a cesspool, the others are just less strict on moderation. 💀
Framing institutional capture as a 'nuclear weapon' where you either use it or it's used against you ☢️ — False Dilemma (20/100)
Comparing 'institutional capture' to a nuclear weapon with only two options: use it or be destroyed. That's a false dilemma, baby! 💥
Blames "bad faith, unintelligent, uninformed capitalism" by the "lowest common denominator" for societal issues. — Loaded Language (45/100)
He's throwing around "bad faith" and "lowest common denominator" like they're scientific terms — pure emotional appeal, no specifics. 🎭
You can't abstain, because if you don't act, 'they' will act against you — a classic false dilemma. ⚔️ — False Dilemma (20/100)
Presents only two options: act or be acted upon. — Ignores any middle ground or nuance. 🤷♀️
Presenting a false dilemma: act or be acted upon — False Dilemma (20/100)
This 'do it or it'll be done to you' framing is classic false dilemma — like there are only two options in the universe 💀
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →