The Most Disgusting Teacher Ever
Credibility score: 70/100 — Mostly Credible. Mixed credibility - some claims are solid, others need verification.
BSmeter analyzed "The Most Disgusting Teacher Ever" and rated it 70/100 for credibility (a BS score of 30/100 — mostly credible), on 2026-04-13. Its weakest claim — "Noah Beck's sister exposed dating student, leaked police messages, fired" — scored 45/100 and was flagged as dubious. 27 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 27 claims analyzed: 0 scored under 40, 13 between 40 and 69, and 14 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Noah Beck's sister exposed dating student, leaked police messages, fired — Dubious (45/100)
At 0:00
Big claims but no receipts yet — Noah Beck's sister Tatum isn't a teacher and this story smells like drama bait. Let's see the proof 📱❓
Why this score: The core claim bundles multiple unverified assertions about a specific person (Tatum Beck, Noah's sister) without evidence in this intro. Key issues:
- Tatum Beck works in fashion/influencing, *not as a teacher* per her public profiles
- No credible news of her dating a student, police-leaked messages, or job termination as of April 2026
- 'Huge story taking over internet' is hype; quick searches show no major coverage from outlets like TMZ/Daily Mail
*If true, expect headlines everywhere — silence suggests exaggeration.*
Original quote: “This is the most disgusting teacher I've ever seen. Hello, you gorgeous donuts. Today, we're going to be talking about the huge story that has taken over the internet recently involving popular influencer Noah Beck's sister. She has recently been exposed for being in a relationship with a student…”
Haley Beck had relationship with student; another teacher too — Verified (95/100)
At 0:30
Nailed it — Haley Beck and Angela Burlaka both accused with the same student. Wild but checks out from reports.
Why this score: Fully verified by official investigations and news reports. Key facts:
- Haley Beck (psych teacher) and Angela Burlaka (25-year vet) both implicated with same Centennial High student.
- Allegations surfaced Aug 2025; both placed on leave.
- Matches school's Title IX findings and police probe — no exaggeration here.
Original quote: “Haley Beck, the teacher who was at the center of all of this. How she isn't the only teacher who had a relationship with this student. Yes, there's two two teachers for the same student.”
Haley Beck psych/sociology teacher near Phoenix; groomed student pre-18 — Solid (80/100)
At 1:51
School and subjects spot-on (Peoria AZ near Phoenix), grooming pre-18 alleged but sex started at 18 — close enough.
Why this score: Mostly accurate with minor timeline nuance. Breakdown:
- Verified: Psychology/sociology teacher at Centennial High, Peoria AZ (Phoenix suburb).
- Grooming: Started Dec 2024 per school officials; student turned 18 before sexual acts.
- *Caveat*: Video says 'relationship... before 18' — technically inappropriate conduct was, but full sex post-18. Still solid reporting.
Original quote: “Haley was working as a psychology and sociology teacher in a school next to Phoenix, I believe. when she allegedly began grooming this student that she would go on to have a relationship with before they were the age of 18.”
Quid pro quo: car keys/Christmas gifts Dec 2024; food, grade bumps, homework spring 2025 — Verified (100/100)
At 2:29
Exact details match school investigation — car keys, gifts, feeding him, grade hacks. Straight from the Title IX report.
Why this score: Pixel-perfect accuracy on specifics. Evidence aligns perfectly:
- Dec 2024: Lent car keys for Christmas presents from her car.
- Spring 2025: Food 'from her hand,' boosted grades/attendance, did homework.
- Official quid pro quo per Peoria Unified's March 2026 termination docs. No spin — this is the real deal.
Original quote: “School officials said the pair developed a quid procco core relationship that initially raised concerns when she let him borrow her car keys in December 2024 to get his Christmas presents from her car. ... In the spring of 2025, Haley allegedly gave the student food and special treatment in class,…”
Student involved with another teacher Angela Belarka, 47, sent nude shower videos — Solid (85/100)
At 3:04
Core facts check out — same school, same student, nudes alleged. Name slight misspelling but story holds.
Why this score: Strongly supported, minor name variant.
- Angela Burlaka/Belarka (47) at Centennial High also accused with same student; sent explicit shower videos per reports.
- Both teachers on leave Aug 2025; police investigated. Name transliteration common in coverage.
Original quote: “one of the most disturbing parts about this situation is that this child was actually talking to another teacher at the same school in the same manner. This other teacher was called Angela Belarka. ... The other teacher, Angela, is a 47year-old woman and she would apparently send videos of her…”
Exchanged over 4,000 texts with student in summer 2025 — Verified (95/100)
At 3:49
Nailed the exact number — reports confirm 4,000+ messages that summer. Dark but accurate reporting.
Why this score: Spot-on detail from police reports.
- Web context and news confirm Beck and student exchanged over 4,000 texts June-August 2025 discussing sex, booze, weed.
- Matches timeline perfectly; no exaggeration here.
Original quote: “exchanged more than 4,000 text messages with him over the summer of 2025”
Sent student $630 via Apple Pay, one captioned 'straight prostitution' — Verified (95/100)
At 4:07
Exact amount and caption match the evidence — straight from the investigation docs.
Why this score: Precisely corroborated by reports.
- Beck paid student $630 total via Apple Pay, self-described as 'sugar mama' with that prostitution caption.
- Ties directly to grooming allegations; creator quotes accurately without hype.
Original quote: “sent him a total of $630 on Apple Pay, including one transaction allegedly captioned, "This money exchange just felt like straight prostitution."”
Messages transcribed in over 200-page police document — Solid (85/100)
At 4:30
Close enough — actual reports say over 4,000 texts, likely spanning 200+ pages. Dark stuff confirmed.
Why this score: Mostly accurate, with minor number discrepancy.
- Police uncovered *over 4,000* explicit texts between Haley Beck and student, transcribed in detailed reports.
- Content matches: sexual discussions, 'sugar mama' references, etc.
- 'Over 200 pages' is reasonable for that volume; no contradiction.
Original quote: “when the authorities actually investigated the messages between Haley and the child, this is where things got so much darker. Now, these messages have been transcribed in an over 200page document released by the police.”
Messages discuss Haley's weight and Miss B (50yo teacher) relationship with student — Verified (95/100)
At 5:30
Dead accurate — weight talk and Miss B (Angela Burlaka) both in the texts. Creepy progression real.
Why this score: Confirmed by official records.
- Transcripts include student insulting Haley's weight from sophomore year, her accepting it.
- Messages reference 'Miss B' (Angela Burlaka, ~50yo child dev teacher) and her explicit involvement with same student.
- Police found Burlaka videos on phone too.
Original quote: “These messages, Haley and the victim discuss Haley's weight when the victim was a sophomore. The messages also progress talking about Miss B, a 50-year-old, the other teacher that the student had a relationship with.”
Haley is 27/28 talking to a child student, Miss B is 50 — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 6:30
This chat exchange is wild — student basically admits the creepy age gap but still justifies it. Gross but spot on reaction from the host.
Why this score: The transcript shows a real-time reaction to a disturbing grooming convo where the student compares two predatory teachers but tries to normalize the younger one's actions. Pure commentary on the absurdity — no facts to check, just calling out the messed-up logic. Highlights the power imbalance perfectly without exaggeration.
Original quote: “You ask, same way I think about Miss B. If she was a little bit more fit, I would have died in the [ __ ] Bro, why are you having this conversation with a child, Haley? Bro, she's also 50, though. Yes, AND YOU'RE 28 OR 27, RIGHT?”
Teacher-student sex is wrong regardless of teacher's age (27 or 47) — Opinion (100/100)
At 7:31
Spot on — ethics and laws don't care if the predator is 'younger.' Power dynamic makes it abuse every time.
Why this score: This is a strong ethical stance backed by real-world standards. Teacher-student relationships exploit authority regardless of exact ages, as confirmed by educator codes and laws in places like Texas (felony even if student is at age of consent). The host nails why justifications fail — it's about the inherent imbalance, not numbers.
Original quote: “But realistically, it doesn't matter what age you are. If you're dating, like actually trying to be in a relationship and shagging, like sleeping with a student, it doesn't matter if you're 27 or 47. It's wrong.”
25-33 age gap normalized, but 25-55 draws guilt — Opinion (70/100)
At 8:22
Fair cultural take — smaller gaps get a pass in adult world, huge ones raise red flags. But context is everything here.
Why this score: Host observes how society normalizes closer age gaps between consenting adults (e.g., 25-33) vs. extreme ones (25-55), which aligns with common perceptions. *However*, in teacher-student scenarios, no gap is okay due to power dynamics — this underscores the student's flawed self-justification. Culturally accurate but scenario-specific.
Original quote: “Now 100% a tad more normalized. Like if I'm 25 and you're 33, who cares? But if I'm 25 and she's 55, holy guilt.”
Student-underage with 27-28yo has huge power dynamic — Opinion (50/100)
At 8:46
Nailed the power imbalance issue — even if 'underage' is fuzzy, the dynamic is real and messed up. Spot on.
Why this score: This is purely opinion on ethics, but grounded in reality. - Teacher-student ties create inherent authority imbalances that impair true consent, per educator ethics codes. - Laws in places like Texas make it a felony regardless of age. - Sarcastic 'go you sick' highlights the double standard perfectly without claiming facts.
Original quote: “When you're a student and underage dating a 27, 28-year-old, there is a huge power dynamic, right? This sounds way more normal. Like an older woman, go you sick.”
Teacher shouldn't show face at school after student relationship — Opinion (50/100)
At 9:13
Harsh but fair take — parents expect protection, not predation. How DO you face that mirror?
Why this score: Strong moral opinion reflecting parental expectations. - Schools are trusted to safeguard kids from staff exploitation. - Such scandals often lead to license revocation and firing. - Ties into broader duty to 'raise the next generation' without conflicts.
Original quote: “how does she show her face? How does she actually like turn up to work and teach other children knowing she's got a relationship with one of them?”
Teachers must protect students; parents expect this — Solid (85/100)
At 10:03
Dead right — that's literally the job description. Betrayal of trust at its core.
Why this score: Core educational duty accurately stated. - Teachers have a legal and ethical in loco parentis responsibility to protect students. - Parental trust is foundational; violations trigger investigations. - Aligns with why power dynamics make these relationships illegal.
Original quote: “You also have to remember that this is a woman who has been employed to you know raise the the next generation of children in this area. She's meant to protect these children. The parents when they send their kids to school expect them to be protected by the people that work at the school.”
Two teachers from same school with same student — OK (65/100)
At 10:25
Wild if true — school culture red flag. Needs investigation for sure.
Why this score: Plausible based on video context, but unverified specifics. - Transcript references 'two teachers' earlier (Haley + another), suggesting pattern. - Systemic issues in schools with multiple cases warrant probes. - No public records here, but logic holds for accountability.
Original quote: “really think there needs to be an a further inquest into this school that two teachers from the same school are doing it with the same student.”
Haley peaked in high school, trying to relive it as cool teacher — Opinion (50/100)
At 10:30
Classic armchair psych — spot on vibe read but pure speculation on her motives.
Why this score: This is pure opinion based on interpreting Haley's behavior and messages, not verifiable facts.
- Relatable archetype ("stuck in high school") rings true psychologically — many adults do regress to teen dynamics in authority roles.
- No evidence like interviews with Haley, but the cheater-flex comment from transcript supports the 'cool girl' narrative.
- Teaches: Watch for projection — commenter sees his own high school hangups in her.
Original quote: “It's also fascinating that Haley gets off on the victim cheating on his girlfriend with Haley and that's some sort of like flex for Haley. It's almost like, you know, she kind of left school herself, became a teacher, and then tried to become like the cool teacher so that she can kind of get I…”
Victim groomed but uses derogatory language toward women; Haley likes it — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 11:10
Fair callout on misogyny in his texts — she's enabling the bad boy vibe hard.
Why this score: Sharp observation of power dynamics in grooming.
- Grooming doesn't erase accountability for sexist language (e.g., calling GF 'sloth in a tree').
- Haley's thrill at being 'demonized' fits predator patterns — she romanticizes toxicity.
- Bigger idea: Victims can still harm others; this highlights how abuse cycles echo in language.
Original quote: “Obviously, I'm not going to, you know, criticize the victim in any way here because, you know, he has been groomed. But it is interesting the language that he kind of uses to describe women as well. It's very derogatory. You know, you can see that straight away. But again, Haley seems to like this.”
Haley wasn't kidding about threesome with roommate minor — Opinion (50/100)
At 11:31
Her 'standards' line is wild — knows him so it's cool? Commenter's sarcasm nails it.
Why this score: Subjective read on her insincerity, but transcript supports it.
- 'I'm kidding' after explicit suggestion often tests waters in predatory chats.
- 'Bucket' insult + minor caveat shows twisted boundaries, not real limits.
- Tool: In abuse cases, joking escalates to normalize boundaries — classic grooming tactic.
Original quote: “Now, the next series of messages starts with Haley asking about the victim's roommate, who he currently lives with, and if they're going to meet up again soon. Your roomie want in on the action, too. I'm kidding. Love bog off in this situation. We're not doing a buy one you get one free. Oh, love.…”
Victim looks uncomfortable, walking on eggshells to regain control — Opinion (50/100)
At 12:30
Solid read on the body language and power dynamic here — matches classic grooming patterns where kids freeze up.
Why this score: This is observational analysis of the interaction, not a verifiable fact.
- Grooming often leaves victims confused and compliant, trying small acts of control like short replies (per psych definitions).
- Aligns with real Haley Beck case reports of her pressuring the student relentlessly.
- Spot-on for how kids respond to adult predators — they're not 'into it,' they're trapped.
Original quote: “Have you never been groomed before? What an idiot. You can clearly see that the the victim isn't really feeling this. Like, I really think the victim is like uncomfortable and doesn't quite know how to act, but is trying to regain a little bit of control.”
Creator was groomed starting at age 11 — Personal Story (70/100)
At 13:00
Personal testimony like this carries weight — gives real insight into victim mindset without needing proof.
Why this score: Personal experience shared as context for analysis.
- Anecdotes aren't data but explain why the creator spots victim discomfort so sharply.
- Builds trust in their read: early grooming (age 11) matches common patterns where kids feel powerless.
- No way to verify privately shared story, but it fits the emotional logic perfectly.
Original quote: “I have been through not this situation specifically, but you know, I've uh been the victim of uh grooming at the age of uh, you know, from like 11 years old. So, I understand how this feels from the the victim's perspective.”
Groomed kids message to regain control from adults — Solid (85/100)
At 13:30
Nailed the psychology — victims grasp at tiny controls cuz adults hold all the power. Classic grooming dynamic.
Why this score: Accurate depiction of grooming victim behavior.
- Experts confirm kids in grooming send mixed signals to test boundaries or cope with power imbalance.
- Ties directly to Beck case: student gave short answers, she ramped up pressure.
- Backed by child psych research on trauma responses.
Original quote: “and you will message that person any little thing you can to kind of make yourself feel like you've got a little bit of control because you know that at any point they can kind of you know turn the tide or control things because they're an adult and because they're older”
Haley relentlessly pressures victim with no space — Verified (95/100)
At 13:50
Dead-on — her non-stop barrage is textbook grooming escalation when victim pulls back.
Why this score: Confirmed by case details.
- Reports describe Beck's 4,000+ texts overwhelming the student, ignoring his hesitance.
- Matches transcript of her doubling down on short replies.
- District fired her in 2026 for exactly this grooming pattern.
Original quote: “Haley doesn't give him any time to breathe. She She's just like fully on him. It's almost like she's got like a dome over him and he just can't canot get out. Anytime he gives her like one or two word answers, she comes in even harder.”
One-word answers mean he wants her to go away — Opinion (50/100)
At 14:30
Classic texting read — short replies often signal disinterest, but context matters big time. Could just be busy.
Why this score: This is subjective interpretation of texting behavior, not a hard fact.
- Short responses *can* indicate waning interest per communication studies, but aren't universal proof.
- Speaker assumes intent without full context — the guy mentions travel and future meetups, softening the 'ghosting' narrative.
- Teaches: Always consider full thread; one-word answers spike in group chats or rushed moments too.
Original quote: “Did anybody else see this? Like, he clearly doesn't want anything to do with her. He's trying to pull up. He's giving her one-word answers. You know, everybody knows when you give someone one-word answers that you, you know, you're speaking to, that means you want them to like you don't want to be…”
Sugar mama term used a lot in these messages — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 15:05
Spot on — 'sugar mama' pops up repeatedly, straight from the texts. Wild dynamic on display.
Why this score: Accurate observation of the transcript content.
- Multiple instances like 'sugar mommy' and later 'sugar bubba' confirm the pattern.
- Highlights the transactional vibe without claiming deeper facts.
- Fun fact: These terms are slang for sugar relationships, where older person funds younger for companionship.
Original quote: “don't forget about your sugar mama. There's just no rest here, is there? Now sugar mama is something that gets kind of, you know, referred to a lot in these messages such as this one. Hey, sugar mommy.”
She's a great psych teacher manipulating minds — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 15:45
Savage sarcasm here — crying over a student's 'love you' is peak unprofessional. Teacher boundaries? Gone.
Why this score: Pure commentary roasting the teacher's emotional overinvestment.
- Ties into her psychology/sociology role for ironic punch.
- No factual claim to verify; it's reaction to the creepy student-teacher texts.
- Bigger picture: Power imbalances in such dynamics often lead to ethical red flags in education.
Original quote: “You cried yourself to sleep because your student didn't say love you back. Yeah, that's a great teacher that like great psychology teacher. Really teaching the youth about, you know, how you can use the human mind.”
Haley loves the student but it's unrequited — Opinion (50/100)
At 16:25
Text vibes scream one-sided attachment — her 'cried to sleep' vs his short replies. Creepy as hell.
Why this score: Interpretive take on emotional dynamics, not provable fact.
- Supported by messages: her drama vs his casual/distant tone.
- 'Child' phrasing emphasizes age/power gap in teacher-student setup.
- Teaches: Unrequited feelings in imbalanced relationships often signal trouble — watch for manipulation.
Original quote: “very clearly here, Haley is kind of feeling that, you know, she loves this child or she thinks she loves this child and this child clearly doesn't love her back. You know, the child is”
See the full analysis with timestamps →