GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?
Credibility score: 50/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "GLM-5.2 Is INSANE – Is This the BEST New Open Source Model?" and rated it 50/100 for credibility (a BS score of 50/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-06-14. Its weakest claim — "Past GLM subscription performance was lackluster + price went up a lot" — scored 50/100 and was flagged as personal story. 5 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Past GLM subscription performance was lackluster + price went up a lot — Personal Story (50/100)
He's just sharing his own paid experience — can't fact-check someone's wallet pain
GLM-5.2 GTA city output ranks among best city-scaled results seen — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it one of the most properly city-scaled he's seen — fair subjective take, no numbers to check.
GLM-5.2 produced a much better C++ rally game than Kimi K2.7 from yesterday — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it a 'stark difference' and 'phenomenal' after letting it use RayLib — that's a softer test than raw C++ from scratch
C++ rally game with ray was one of the best results — Opinion (50/100)
Subjective win — he liked the splash screen and overall feel, no objective benchmark given.
GLM-5.2 will likely be the best open-weight model overall — Opinion (50/100)
Calling it the single best open model after one test run — that's a big leap from subway NPCs.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →