Bloodborne Perfected Weapons - A Deep Dive on Design
Credibility score: 49/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "Bloodborne Perfected Weapons - A Deep Dive on Design" and rated it 49/100 for credibility (a BS score of 51/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-07-18. Its weakest claim — ""Absolutely perfectly crafted" for everyone — sweeping praise with no caveats" — scored 45/100 and was flagged as loaded language. 24 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 24 claims analyzed: 0 scored under 40, 22 between 40 and 69, and 2 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
"Absolutely perfectly crafted" for everyone — sweeping praise with no caveats — Loaded Language (45/100)
At 0:47
Calls the entire roster "absolutely perfectly" designed — that's not analysis, that's worship.
Why this score: Loaded Language — the speaker uses absolute superlatives like "absolutely perfectly" and "a weapon for everyone" to frame subjective design preference as objective perfection, skipping any mention of weapons that feel clunky or unbalanced to some players.
Original quote: “But what really made me think was how absolutely perfectly From Software crafted all these different weapons. There's a weapon for everyone in Bloodborne, and they all fit different builds, aesthetics, and general enjoyment.”
Saw Spear looks like cleaver but 'vastly different' — only three stabs as spear — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 4:06
Calls the uses 'vastly different' then only gives one minor mechanical difference.
Why this score: The 'vastly different' framing sets up a big distinction, but the only concrete evidence offered is that three of its attacks stab instead of slash. That's a tweak, not a gulf. The confidence level doesn't match the single data point provided.
Original quote: “A weapon that's visually similar to the saw cleaver, but with vastly different uses. Untransformed, it's wielded similarly to the saw cleaver, but its transformed move set is immediately more distinct. It's swung much wider than the saw cleaver, almost in a way reminding me of a partisan. However,…”
States exact location without evidence — confident sourcing — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 4:35
Names 'aqueducts in Yarnardum' like it's canon — no source cited, just dropped.
Why this score: Speaker presents a precise in-game location as fact while giving zero indication where this information came from. In a deep-dive video, that confidence implies either personal discovery or established lore, yet neither is referenced.
Original quote: “the saw spear can be found abandoned in the aqueducts in Yarnardum and attached to a hanging corpse”
Calls it 'best friend' for arcane 99 builds — no data shown — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 5:19
Says it's the 'best friend' for arcane 99 at BL120 — then admits C scaling. Bold claim, thin support.
Why this score: The speaker asserts the saw spear is optimal for high-arcane builds despite acknowledging only C scaling. No damage numbers, no comparison to alternatives, just the label. The conclusion outruns the evidence given.
Original quote: “it's a 99 arcane user's best friend. When attempting to stay within blood level 120 and capping at arcane 99, the scaling does only go up to a C, but it provides you with an incredibly simple weapon”
Defers to unnamed 'legend Speed Lee' for arcane mechanics — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
At 5:46
Hands the arcane deep-dive to 'the legend Speed Lee' — no link, no credentials, just the name.
Why this score: Speaker invokes an external authority to cover the actual mechanics while offering nothing himself. The move lets him sidestep providing evidence by pointing at someone else's supposed expertise without substantiating why that person qualifies.
Original quote: “At least from what I've seen via the legend Speed Lee. If you want to know all the inner workings of the arcane stat, then they're who you need to check out”
Claims FromSoft never had this many enemies before Bloodborne — Missing Context (45/100)
At 6:54
Says 'never had this many' — skips DS1's Anor Londo archers and Blighttown crowds. Missing Context.
Why this score: The speaker presents a clean 'first time' narrative by ignoring earlier Souls games that already threw big groups at the player. The comparison only works if you forget the precedent.
Original quote: “in comparison to Demon Souls and Dark Souls 1, FromSoft never had this many enemies on screen at once”
Assumes enemy density was deliberate engine flexing — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 6:58
Calls it a 'flex' with zero evidence — just his read on their intent. Confidence Mismatch.
Why this score: The line moves from observation (more enemies) straight to motive (showing off the engine) without any interview, patch note, or dev comment to back it. It's confident speculation dressed as insight.
Original quote: “Honestly, I think they were trying to flex a little with how much their engine had grown from the original Souls titles”
Assumes ornate design means it wasn't made for hunts — Missing Context (45/100)
At 7:40
Fancy = repurposed knight weapon — skips that hunters literally repurpose everything. Missing Context.
Why this score: The logic treats ornate detail as proof of prior use, ignoring that Bloodborne's hunters are defined by scavenging and jury-rigging. The 'too fancy' assumption collapses once you remember the setting's core theme.
Original quote: “It looks way too fancy to have been made on purpose for the hunts”
Asks for favorite weapon opinions while assuming threaded cane has passionate fans — No Frame (75/100)
At 10:42
Straight question to viewers — no trick, just fishing for engagement.
Why this score: He's directly asking the audience for their thoughts and preferences. This is plain audience interaction, not a loaded claim or persuasion tactic.
Original quote: “But more than when I asked about the tenitrous in our previous video, how many of you guys' favorite weapon is the threaded cane? Let me know what your favorite weapon is regardless. But I'd love to hear from the folk that love the threaded cane like no other weapon in Bloodborne and why it speaks…”
Claims Ludwig's Holy Blade is most people's favorite weapon — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
At 11:02
Calls it 'most people's favorite' — names zero sources or polls.
Why this score: He presents community consensus as fact without any data, poll, or evidence. The phrasing does the work of making it sound widely agreed upon when it's just his assertion.
Original quote: “A trick weapon typically used by healing church hunters. It is said that the silver sword was employed by Ludvig, the first hunter of the church. When transformed, it combines with its sheath to form a great sword. It exhibits several departures from the workshop's design, suggesting that the…”
States exact scaling values: double B STR/SKL, A ARC, 16 STR / 12 SKL reqs — No Frame (75/100)
At 11:39
Specific numbers delivered plainly — matches the actual game data.
Why this score: He's citing concrete stat values that align with the game's design. No exaggeration or framing trick here, just accurate description of the weapon's requirements and scaling.
Original quote: “But what makes it really fantastic is how well it scales. With a double B in strength and skill and insane A scaling in Arcane, it's a weapon that works well on any build so long as you meet the 16th strength requirement and the minuscule 12 skill necessity.”
Acknowledges hype then doubles down with 'no way I can't' — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 12:08
Flags his own hype then immediately claims it's impossible to overstate — classic move.
Why this score: He calls out the potential for overhyping, then immediately asserts the weapon is so good that overhyping isn't possible. The confidence exceeds the justification offered.
Original quote: “I'm probably sounding like I'm overhyping this weapon up, but there really is no way I can't. It's just that good and welldesigned.”
Kirkhammer was 'original peak of endgame strength' pre-DLC — Missing Context (45/100)
At 13:42
Calls it the 'peak' with zero comparison data or patch history shown.
Why this score: Speaker asserts the Kirkhammer held the top strength spot before the DLC but provides no stats, patch notes, or community benchmarks to support the claim. The qualifier 'in some cases' softens it without adding evidence.
Original quote: “this weapon was the original peak of endgame strength builds before the old hunter DLC, and in some cases still is the peak of absolute power over speed.”
Suggests arcane scaling as possible holy origin — then pivots to strength as main feature — Volume Game (45/100)
At 14:41
Floats arcane holy link, immediately downplays it for strength scaling — quiet retreat in the same breath.
Why this score: Opens the possibility of sacred chalice origins via arcane, then immediately shifts emphasis to strength scaling as the 'main feature' without addressing the tension between the two.
Original quote: “Well, the Kirkhammer also scales with arcane, so it could be one possibility, but its main feature is its a scaling and strength.”
States Garin wielded the burial blade and its blade is cyerite from the heavens. — Missing Context (45/100)
At 17:22
Mixes canon name with fan name and adds 'heavens' lore the game never says.
Why this score: The weapon is canonically wielded by Gehrman, not 'Garin.' The 'cyerite from the heavens' bit is pure embellishment — the game only says it's made of siderite. He's treating speculation as established fact.
Original quote: “Trick weapon wielded by Garin, the first hunter, a masterpiece that defined the entire array of weapons crafted at the workshop. Its blade is forged with cyerite said to have fallen from the heavens.”
Calls meteorite sourcing a 'wonder' without evidence — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 18:40
Treats the meteorite origin as established fact then acts shocked it happened — zero receipts either way.
Why this score: The speaker presents the meteorite lore as accepted truth, then immediately expresses amazement at its scale. No in-game text, item description, or source is cited to ground the claim, so the wonder feels unearned.
Original quote: “Given its age, it's a miracle the burial blade still functions at all. And it's any wonder as to how Garin was able to procure a large enough piece of meteorite to forge such a complicated weapon.”
Powder Kegs framed as unique heretics who openly embrace violence — Loaded Language (45/100)
At 20:30
Calls them 'heretics' and contrasts them with 'most' hunters like it's a big revelation — emotional framing doing the heavy lifting.
Why this score: The loaded terms 'heretics' and 'most would do' create a dramatic divide without evidence that other factions actually tried to hide their actions or that this was the defining difference.
Original quote: “The powder kegs are by far my favorite faction of Bloodborne. Because compared to the attempt at hiding a hunter's deeds like most would do, the heretics of the powder kegs instead wanted to blow up, smash, and incinerate the beasts they hunted.”
Calls stake driver "everyone's favorite" — no evidence, just assertion — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
At 22:45
Says "everyone's favorite" like it's fact — names zero players or polls 💀
Why this score: Classic anonymous authority move. Speaker presents a subjective preference as collective consensus without citing any actual player data, polls, or community consensus. The claim lands heavier than the evidence supports.
Original quote: “While on the subject of the powder kegs, next is everyone's favorite one-hit killer, the glorious stake driver.”
Weapon steeped in victims' blood and souls — loaded lore delivery — Loaded Language (45/100)
At 24:45
Dramatic phrasing ('bathed in pools of blood') does the heavy lifting instead of the actual history.
Why this score: The speaker piles on evocative horror imagery to make the wheel feel uniquely cursed, but the real brutality comes from the documented medieval breaking wheel mechanics he describes later — the blood-and-soul flavor is just flavor text layered on top.
Original quote: “Weapon wielded by Martyr Legarius's band of executioners used to slaughter vile bloods in Canhurst. Bathed in pools of their blood and forever steeped in their eye.”
"exponentially" with zero numbers shown — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 26:40
Calls the damage boost 'exponential' like he ran the math — no values, no comparison.
Why this score: Word does the heavy lifting. 'Exponential' implies a specific curve, yet nothing on screen or in the description backs the scale. Classic overclaim dressed as flavor.
Original quote: “This saps your health, likely the vile blood spirits eating away at your very being. but it increases your damage exponentially.”
States serration as 'the key weakness' to beasts with no source — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
At 29:01
'The key weakness' — sounds like established fact, names zero text or item description.
Why this score: Presents serration as the definitive counter without quoting any in-game text or NPC line that actually calls it the key weakness. Classic 'we all know' move.
Original quote: “Serration is the key weakness to beasts after all, and bludgeoning them probably wasn't in the style of fast and quick cuts.”
Frames Izzy's backstory as total mystery despite in-game hints — Missing Context (45/100)
At 30:30
Calls it 'absolutely no understanding' while game drops beast-claw and tomb-prospector links right there.
Why this score: Speaker builds intrigue by erasing the partial lore the item descriptions already give. Classic move: pretend the puzzle has zero pieces so the speculation feels bigger.
Original quote: “what kind of man Izzy was to have so many bestial items related to him and absolutely no understanding of where he even came from”
Mod endorsement as game-changer — Plain Sales Pitch — Plain Sales Pitch (45/100)
At 33:20
Calls a Nexus mod a 'gamecher' with zero gameplay shown — that's a sales line wearing a review coat.
Why this score: Speaker pivots from personal annoyance straight into a plug for someone else's mod. The 'I can't endorse it enough' line is doing the work of evidence; no footage, no before-after, just the recommendation itself. Classic soft sell dressed as discovery.
Original quote: “Thankfully, however, someone finally released a mod over on the Nexus that mods out the sound effects, and I can't endorse it enough. If you have access to Chad PS4, my god, it's a gamecher.”
Etymology from unnamed post — Anonymous Authority — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
At 34:55
Cites 'the detailed post I had seen' — zero link, zero name. Classic 'some guy on the internet' move.
Why this score: Speaker builds the weapon's origin story on a single unsourced forum post. No corroboration offered, so the etymology stands or falls on that invisible authority.
Original quote: “Writer Palash, at least according to the detailed post I had seen, is a mix of German and Hungarian. Writer being horseback rider and palash meaning sword. So, it was a horseback rider sword. effectively.”
See the full analysis with timestamps →