Bloodborne Perfected Weapons - A Deep Dive on Design
Credibility score: 49/100 — Mixed Credibility. Several questionable claims detected. Watch with healthy skepticism.
BSmeter analyzed "Bloodborne Perfected Weapons - A Deep Dive on Design" and rated it 49/100 for credibility (a BS score of 51/100 — mixed credibility), on 2026-07-18. Its weakest claim — ""Absolutely perfectly crafted" for everyone — sweeping praise with no caveats" — scored 45/100 and was flagged as loaded language. 24 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
"Absolutely perfectly crafted" for everyone — sweeping praise with no caveats — Loaded Language (45/100)
Calls the entire roster "absolutely perfectly" designed — that's not analysis, that's worship.
Saw Spear looks like cleaver but 'vastly different' — only three stabs as spear — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Calls the uses 'vastly different' then only gives one minor mechanical difference.
States exact location without evidence — confident sourcing — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Names 'aqueducts in Yarnardum' like it's canon — no source cited, just dropped.
Calls it 'best friend' for arcane 99 builds — no data shown — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Says it's the 'best friend' for arcane 99 at BL120 — then admits C scaling. Bold claim, thin support.
Defers to unnamed 'legend Speed Lee' for arcane mechanics — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
Hands the arcane deep-dive to 'the legend Speed Lee' — no link, no credentials, just the name.
Claims FromSoft never had this many enemies before Bloodborne — Missing Context (45/100)
Says 'never had this many' — skips DS1's Anor Londo archers and Blighttown crowds. Missing Context.
Assumes enemy density was deliberate engine flexing — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Calls it a 'flex' with zero evidence — just his read on their intent. Confidence Mismatch.
Assumes ornate design means it wasn't made for hunts — Missing Context (45/100)
Fancy = repurposed knight weapon — skips that hunters literally repurpose everything. Missing Context.
Asks for favorite weapon opinions while assuming threaded cane has passionate fans — No Frame (75/100)
Straight question to viewers — no trick, just fishing for engagement.
Claims Ludwig's Holy Blade is most people's favorite weapon — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
Calls it 'most people's favorite' — names zero sources or polls.
States exact scaling values: double B STR/SKL, A ARC, 16 STR / 12 SKL reqs — No Frame (75/100)
Specific numbers delivered plainly — matches the actual game data.
Acknowledges hype then doubles down with 'no way I can't' — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Flags his own hype then immediately claims it's impossible to overstate — classic move.
Kirkhammer was 'original peak of endgame strength' pre-DLC — Missing Context (45/100)
Calls it the 'peak' with zero comparison data or patch history shown.
Suggests arcane scaling as possible holy origin — then pivots to strength as main feature — Volume Game (45/100)
Floats arcane holy link, immediately downplays it for strength scaling — quiet retreat in the same breath.
States Garin wielded the burial blade and its blade is cyerite from the heavens. — Missing Context (45/100)
Mixes canon name with fan name and adds 'heavens' lore the game never says.
Calls meteorite sourcing a 'wonder' without evidence — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Treats the meteorite origin as established fact then acts shocked it happened — zero receipts either way.
Powder Kegs framed as unique heretics who openly embrace violence — Loaded Language (45/100)
Calls them 'heretics' and contrasts them with 'most' hunters like it's a big revelation — emotional framing doing the heavy lifting.
Calls stake driver "everyone's favorite" — no evidence, just assertion — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
Says "everyone's favorite" like it's fact — names zero players or polls 💀
Weapon steeped in victims' blood and souls — loaded lore delivery — Loaded Language (45/100)
Dramatic phrasing ('bathed in pools of blood') does the heavy lifting instead of the actual history.
"exponentially" with zero numbers shown — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
Calls the damage boost 'exponential' like he ran the math — no values, no comparison.
States serration as 'the key weakness' to beasts with no source — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
'The key weakness' — sounds like established fact, names zero text or item description.
Frames Izzy's backstory as total mystery despite in-game hints — Missing Context (45/100)
Calls it 'absolutely no understanding' while game drops beast-claw and tomb-prospector links right there.
Mod endorsement as game-changer — Plain Sales Pitch — Plain Sales Pitch (45/100)
Calls a Nexus mod a 'gamecher' with zero gameplay shown — that's a sales line wearing a review coat.
Etymology from unnamed post — Anonymous Authority — Anonymous Authority (45/100)
Cites 'the detailed post I had seen' — zero link, zero name. Classic 'some guy on the internet' move.
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →