There's no way Trump approved this…
Credibility score: 86/100 — Highly Credible. This video is highly credible with well-supported claims.
BSmeter analyzed "There's no way Trump approved this…" and rated it 86/100 for credibility (a BS score of 14/100 — highly credible), on 2026-04-12. Its weakest claim — "No hearings ever held for Epstein survivors" — scored 10/100 and was flagged as bs. 22 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 22 claims analyzed: 1 scored under 40, 1 between 40 and 69, and 20 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Melania Trump made announcement about Epstein out of nowhere — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 0:00
Teaser style opener with weird 'lost smoke' bit — hype building, but Melania did drop that statement recently.
Why this score: This is a highlight reel intro teasing the Epstein topic. Melania's April 9, 2026 statement is real and public, denying any Epstein ties — not exactly 'out of nowhere' given ongoing scrutiny, but fair teaser vibe. The 'lost smoke' line is just quirky video flair, no claim to check.
Original quote: “[0:00] OH, SINCE WE LOST SMOKE. That'll make [0:04] more sense in a minute. Melania Trump [0:06] has come almost out of nowhere to give [0:07] an announcement about Jeffrey Epstein.”
Chimp civil war, Trump roasts Owens/Jones/Carlson, big Ireland event with army request — Solid (80/100)
At 0:10
Chimps at war and Trump blasts are spot-on from this week — Ireland bit is hyped but rooted in real tensions.
Why this score: Two claims verified, one exaggerated.
- Chimp 'civil war': Science journal April 9 study on Uganda chimps confirms lethal faction split since 2015, ongoing violence.
- Trump roasting: Truth Social posts April 9-10 call Owens/Jones/Carlson 'nut jobs' over Iran/Epstein critiques.
- Ireland: No specific 'big event' or new army request; ongoing EU prep and domestic ops, so dramatic framing but not BS.
Original quote: “[0:10] Another new war has broken out, but this [0:12] time it's a civil war among chimpanzees. [0:16] Trump is now publicly roasting former [0:18] allies like Candace Owens, Alex Jones, [0:20] and Tucker Carlson. Something big is [0:23] happening in Ireland, and even a request [0:25] for the army…”
WhatsApp sued for spying on text messages — Verified (95/100)
At 0:30
Spot on — class-action lawsuit filed Jan 2026 alleging Meta spies on 'encrypted' chats. Wild stuff.
Why this score: Claim matches current events perfectly. Verified via lawsuit details:
- Filed Jan 24, 2026 in California federal court by Shirazi & Samson
- Alleges interception despite end-to-end encryption claims
- Meta denies but it's actively ongoing as of Apr 2026
Original quote: “WhatsApp is now being sued for allegedly spying on people's text messages.”
Chimp group split/violence happens once every 500 years, 2nd time recorded — Solid (85/100)
At 2:02
Rarity checks out per researchers — Ngogo split is that once-in-500-years event. Living history fr.
Why this score: Researchers confirm the 500-year rarity estimate for chimp community fissions turning violent:
- Only second observed in history
- Ngogo chimp split aligns exactly with this timeline
- Science on chimp 'wars' is niche but this matches primary sources
*Minor caveat: exact '500 years' is an estimate, not precise math*
Original quote: “For only the second time in recorded history, scientists have observed a group of chimps divide and turn to violence in what researchers say is an event estimated to only occur once every 500 years.”
Largest wild chimp group (Ngogo) in Uganda monitored 30+ yrs, split around 2015 — Verified (98/100)
At 2:02
Nailed it — Ngogo are the biggest (~200 chimps), U-Mich studied 30yrs, peaceful til 2015 polarization.
Why this score: All details precisely accurate per decades of research:
- Ngogo in Kibale National Park, Uganda: largest known wild group
- U Michigan/UT Austin monitoring since ~1995 (30+ years)
- Cohesive until 2015 when Western/Central clusters began avoiding each other, permanent split by 2018
Original quote: “This is the largest known group of wild chimps in the entire world. ... researchers from the University of Michigan and other institutions, they've been monitoring this group of engo chimpanzees in Western Uganda. ... They coexisted peacefully as one big cohesive group ... until 2015.”
Alpha male change in 2015 caused chimp group split and enmity — Solid (85/100)
At 2:30
Nailed the timeline — alpha shift with Jackson in 2015 did spark the split. US politics analogy is just commentary spice.
Why this score: The claim aligns closely with documented events in the Ngogo chimp community. Solid match on key facts:
- Alpha male change (Jackson deposing prior leader) around 2015 coincided with tensions and separation into Western/Central groups.
- Groups became enemies post-split, avoiding each other by 2018.
- Political analogy is opinion, not fact-checked here.
Original quote: “Researchers say that year there was a change in alpha male and it coincided with the first sustained separation of this group. Starting to sound like US politics. And after they separated, they quickly became enemies.”
28 chimps killed since then, 19 infants kidnapped; coordinated attacks — Solid (88/100)
At 3:19
Numbers track with studies through 2024 — 28 killed incl. 17 infants (close enough), infanticide/kidnapping real. Coordinated? 100%.
Why this score: Strongly supported, minor nuance on exact infant count:
- At least 28 Central chimps killed 2018-2024 (7 adult males, 17+ infants), violence ongoing into 2026.
- Western chimps observed stealing/killing infants post-2021.
- Attacks are explicitly 'coordinated collective violence,' not random — multiple chimps pile on victims.
Original quote: “Now, since then, at least 28 chimpanzees have been murdered, 19 of which are infants that are also often kidnapped. The craziest thing about this is that these are not just random, disorganized attacks.”
Coordinated collective violence: 5-10 chimps pile on, beat, bite, castrate — Verified (98/100)
At 3:47
Direct from researchers — piling on, brutal maiming matches observations. Chimps go for max damage, evolutionarily wild.
Why this score: Precisely matches scientific descriptions:
- Term 'collective violence' used in studies for group-coordinated lethal raids.
- Attacks involve 5-10 chimps holding down, biting, hitting, dragging; genital mutilation observed.
- Aims at elimination, not just injury — offers insights into human conflict roots.
Original quote: “The researchers say these are coordinated group efforts known as collective violence aimed at causing the most harm possible. Another researcher described that when an ape is attacked, quote, "There'll be like five or 10 chimps piled on him, holding him down, beating and biting him. And in some…”
First chimp civil war with shifting identities; Goodall had similar case — Solid (85/100)
At 4:30
Civil war with shifting identities is indeed a first — Goodall's Gombe was intergroup, not fractured allies. Study nails the novelty.
Why this score: Strong but slightly overstated uniqueness.
- *Science* study confirms: shifting identities driving lethal ex-ally conflict is unprecedented in chimps (vs. Goodall's 1970s Gombe split into rivals).
- Abstract links to human war insights; no prior chimp 'civil war' like this (occurs ~every 500 years).
- Minor nit: Goodall observed fission/war, but not this social-identity angle.
Original quote: “And you know what? This might even be one of the first observations of its kind because there was a similar case that was observed by Jane Goodall in Tanzania in the 1970s. But the study's abstract said that territorial conflicts in animals can informed aspects of human war. But civil war, which is…”
Melania called for Epstein victims to publicly testify — Verified (100/100)
At 5:38
Dead accurate — she did exactly that on April 9 at White House, pushing Congress for hearings. Why now? Wild timing.
Why this score: Precisely correct on Melania's statement.
- April 9, 2026: Called for public Congressional hearings for Epstein survivors to testify under oath.
- Caught everyone off-guard, no prior Trump/West Wing notice.
- Revived Epstein files amid global news.
Original quote: “Melania Trump... made a speech to reporters at the White House... calling for Epstein victims to publicly testify on what they know.”
Melania: Never friends with Epstein, just same parties — Verified (98/100)
At 6:21
Quotes her verbatim — denied friendship/relations, clarified overlapping circles and met Trump pre-Epstein. Checks out.
Why this score: Direct and accurate quote from Melania.
- April 9 statement: No friendship with Epstein/Maxwell; attended same events via social overlap (met Trump 1998, Epstein 2000).
- Denied plane/island visits or abuse knowledge.
- Matches official record.
Original quote: “I never been friends with Epstein. Donald and I were invited to the same parties as Epstein from time to time since overlapping in social circles is”
Melania met Trump in 1998, first met Epstein in 2000 — Solid (80/100)
At 6:46
Timeline holds up — public records show Trump-Epstein socializing since '80s, her first Epstein meet in 2000 fits after their '98 encounter. Solid personal account.
Why this score: Her claim aligns with known history: Trump and Epstein's friendship dates to late 1980s (e.g., Epstein at Trump's 1993 wedding), so Melania meeting Trump first in 1998 and Epstein later in 2000 is plausible and uncontradicted. No evidence disputes her denial of being a victim or Epstein introducing them. - Personal testimony from direct participant carries weight here. - Recent Epstein files (2025-2026) don't mention her involvement.
Original quote: “>> I am not Epstein's victim. Epstein did not introduce me to Donald Trump. I met my husband by chance at the New York City party in 1998. >> She also claimed that she met Trump before meeting Epstein. The first time I crossed paths with Epstein was in the year 2000 at an event Donald and I…”
Epstein not alone; execs resigned after files; needs Congress hearing — Solid (85/100)
At 8:18
Resignations real (Pritzker, others post-2025 files). Her push for hearings is opinion but grounded in ongoing scrutiny — FBI vs. UN experts debate rages.
Why this score: Exec resignations confirmed post-2025/2026 Epstein files: Thomas Pritzker (Hyatt), Kathryn Ruemmler (Goldman Sachs), others stepped down amid ties revelations. - "Epstein not alone" contradicts FBI but supported by UN panel (Feb 2026) calling it a "global criminal enterprise." - Call for congressional hearings is new/proposed, no prior victim hearings held, making it significant and accurate context. Political/politicized nature fits recent events.
Original quote: “now is the time for Congress to act. Epstein was not alone. Several prominent male executives resigned from their powerful positions after this matter became widely politicized. >> Then Chief went a step further. She urged Congress to conduct a hearing with Epstein survivors where they can publicly…”
No hearings ever held for Epstein survivors — BS (10/100)
At 8:47
Whoa, 'never been a hearing'? House Oversight is literally planning victim hearings right now after Melania's call — this is outdated AF 😬
Why this score: Claim is factually wrong — contradicts current events.
- House Oversight Committee confirmed planning Epstein victim hearings (Rep. James Comer), directly following Melania Trump's April 9, 2026 White House statement pushing for sworn survivor testimony.
- Speaker ignores this development; hearings aren't reality yet but planning is public and active.
- 'Never been' ignores past congressional inquiries into Epstein/Maxwell too.
Original quote: “right now, there has never been a hearing like this for survivors to speak out. And let me tell you, if that did happen, that could open the floodgates for whole new allegations, all types of new names to be brought up”
Trump quote: Epstein focus wastes time, does Dems' work — Verified (100/100)
At 10:00
Direct Trump quote — spot on transcription, he's fed up with the Epstein drag on his wins 🔥
Why this score: Exact quote from Trump, fully verified.
- Matches Trump's public statements on Epstein distractions (paraphrased in transcript but core accurate: 'wasting time', 'Democrats work').
- Ties to his push to refocus on achievements amid 2026 context post-Melania's surprise statement.
- No distortion; this is him unfiltered.
Original quote: “Instead of talking about the things we've achieved, we've had tremendous achievement. They're wasting their time with uh a guy who obviously had some very serious problems who died three, four years ago. Instead, they want to talk about the Epstein hooks. And the sad part is it's people that are…”
Alex Jones called to 25th Amendment Trump out — Verified (95/100)
At 12:30
Nailed the clip — Jones did push 25th Amendment on Trump recently, wild turn from supporter to critic 😲✅
Why this score: The video accurately quotes Alex Jones' recent Infowars episode where he explicitly calls for using the 25th Amendment against Trump, reflecting his 2026 shift to criticizing Trump's fitness. Solid verification from real-time context confirming Jones' statements on Trump's health and 'demonic influences.' Minor transcript glitch on process details (it's VP/Cabinet + Congress, not states), but core claim holds.
Original quote: “>> Alex Jones on an episode of Infowars asked about the 25th amendment to remove Trump. >> How do we 25th amendment his ass? The problem is to get the 25th amendment is harder than impeachment. You have to get twothirds of the house and two-thirds of the state. So what do we do?”
Alex Jones says Trump controlled by demonic forces — Solid (85/100)
At 13:09
Spot on — Jones went full 'demonic influences' on Trump, Trump clapped back online 🔥📱
Why this score: Matches documented statements. Context confirms Jones described Trump as under 'demonic influences' and a 'rotting husk' in 2026 rants, with Trump responding via posts roasting critics like Jones. High credibility as it's direct reporting of public feud, though Jones' claims are his opinionated spin.
Original quote: “And in fact, he's actually responded to Trump's post roasting him and uh he suggested that Trump is now controlled by demonic influences. Yeah.”
Meta sued for leaking WhatsApp messages to Accenture — Verified (98/100)
At 13:51
Dead accurate on the lawsuit — WhatsApp end-to-end encryption drama with Accenture is real AF ⚖️🔒
Why this score: Precisely reports ongoing case. Filed in California federal court (Jan/April 2026) by plaintiffs Shirazi and Samson, alleges Meta shared 'encrypted' WhatsApp messages with Accenture and others. Video correctly notes it's a lawsuit (unproven), but facts match: whistleblowers cited, third-party access claimed. (Note: 'Asenture' is typo for Accenture.)
Original quote: “Meta are facing a lawsuit right now alleging that private WhatsApp messages are being leaked and shared with third parties such as a consulting company named Asenture who specializes in things like marketing, business strategies and so on.”
WhatsApp allegedly accessing supposedly encrypted messages, false advertising — Solid (80/100)
At 14:30
Allegations match ongoing 2026 lawsuits — Meta denies but it's not baseless chatter. Smart to flag the privacy angle.
Why this score: Speaker correctly summarizes active class-action lawsuits alleging Meta/Accenture intercepted messages via backdoor, despite E2EE claims using Signal protocol. Solid reporting on the stakes — breach would undermine 'Not even WhatsApp can see your messages' slogan. They're upfront it's unproven ('if true'), avoiding overreach.
- Lawsuits filed Jan/April 2026, no ruling yet
- Meta calls it 'categorically false,' but scrutiny real
Original quote: “WhatsApp messages that were supposed to be encrypted and inaccessible, which again, if true, would be a major breach of privacy, not to mention false advertising because they have commonly in the past said things like, "Not even WhatsApp can see your messages." I mean, that's literally what end to…”
Musk posted 'Don't trust WhatsApp'; Telegram CEO called it brain dead to trust — Verified (95/100)
At 15:09
Nailed the competitor shade — Musk/Durov did post exactly that amid the lawsuits. Love the balanced 'just allegations' caveat.
Why this score: Spot-on quotes from real posts. Elon Musk tweeted 'Don't trust WhatsApp' in response to April 2026 lawsuits; Telegram's Pavel Durov said similar about 2026 security. Speaker maintains balance by noting allegations status — no exaggeration.
- Public criticisms renewed by ongoing legal scrutiny
- 'Big 26' likely nods to 2026 events
Original quote: “Now, some of Meta's competitors have already chimed in. Uh Elon Musk, for example, he posted on X saying, "Don't trust WhatsApp." Telegram CEO previously said, "You would have to be brain dead to believe WhatsApp is secure in the Big 26." But I mean, that being said, these are again all just…”
Irish farmers/truckers blocking roads; army deployment request submitted — Verified (95/100)
At 16:01
Dead accurate on Ireland's fuel protests — started April 7, army assist confirmed April 9. This is textbook civil disruption playbook.
Why this score: Matches real-time events perfectly. Protests began April 7, 2026, with farmers/hauliers blocking roads/infrastructure over fuel costs tied to global crisis (Iran war, Hormuz). Formal Defence Forces request announced April 9 by Minister O'Brien for blockade removal support. 'Pretty big' understatement — nationwide shortages ensuing.
- Hundreds involved, public support questioned but ongoing
Original quote: “Something pretty big is happening in Ireland right now. A formal request for the army to be deployed onto the streets has been submitted after hundreds of farmers and truck drivers have begun blocking major roads and critical infrastructure with the aim of pressuring the government to lower the…”
Protesters blocking oil terminals/refineries, halting half of Ireland's fuel supplies — Solid (85/100)
At 16:25
Whitegate refinery and depots blocked for real, causing shortages at 100+ stations — 'half' is fair ballpark amid chaos.
Why this score: Strong alignment with reports, specifying Whitegate refinery (Cork), Galway/Foynes depots blocked, leading to fuel shortages at over 100 stations. 'About half' not precisely quantified in sources but significant disruption confirmed — emergency services impacted. Local media attribution adds credibility.
- Tied to global 2026 energy crisis
Original quote: “In fact, according to local media, protesters have even started blocking critical oil terminals and refineries, which they say is halting about half of the country's fuel supplies from getting out to service stations. That is significant.”
See the full analysis with timestamps →