kendodne full series
Credibility score: 25/100 — Low Credibility. High BS alert! Many claims lack evidence or are misleading.
BSmeter analyzed "kendodne full series" and rated it 25/100 for credibility (a BS score of 75/100 — low credibility), on 2026-08-05. Its weakest claim — "Singing Jesus songs will cure homosexuality — musical conversion therapy" — scored 20/100 and was flagged as straw man. 11 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 11 claims analyzed: 9 scored under 40, 2 between 40 and 69, and 0 at 70 or above.
Claims analyzed
Singing Jesus songs will cure homosexuality — musical conversion therapy — Straw Man (20/100)
At 0:32
Builds a fake argument then demolishes it — nobody claimed The Voice cures gayness.
Why this score: Creates a ridiculous premise (TV singing fixes sexual orientation) so the speaker can look clever knocking it down. The actual debate over conversion therapy never enters the picture.
Original quote: “watching The Voice teaches us how to sing and singing at the ultimate tool against the gays how would that stop the gays I always thought gay people love music and also plays in musicals but we sing about our Lord the Savior Jesus to teach them Family Values so they won't be gay anymore”
Born gay or owns a Wii U — false binary on sexual orientation — False Dilemma (20/100)
At 0:49
Two ridiculous options presented as the only ones — erases everything in between.
Why this score: Sets up an absurd either/or (biology or Nintendo) to mock the idea that orientation is innate, ignoring decades of research on genetics, prenatal hormones, and social factors.
Original quote: “but being gay isn't a choice people can only be gay by being born gay or by owning a Nintendo Wii U”
Casual antisemitism tossed in, then pivots to rape 'joke' — emotional whiplash — Emotional Button (20/100)
At 0:55
Drops ethnic slur then immediately undercuts it with a rape 'joke' — shock without substance.
Why this score: Uses religious bigotry and sexual violence as punchlines, then deflects with 'just kidding.' The technique relies on discomfort, not argument.
Original quote: “and Jesus isn't our Lord and savior he was just a dirty Jew I never knew Jesus was a Jew and also being gay isn't a choice thanks you for changing my life in a positive way well ever since I was raped I wanted to just kidding you go into detention”
Redefines "cancer" as anti-trans slur — straw man on a word — Straw Man (20/100)
At 3:15
Cancer = disease. Re-labeling it a slur is a straw man that never existed.
Why this score: They take a literal medical term, twist it into an attack on trans people that no dictionary ever made, then argue against that phantom definition. Classic straw man: invent a ridiculous position, then beat it.
Original quote: “what cancer is offensive word that only bids used to make transgender people kill themselves”
False dilemma: either you agree cancer = suicide slogan, or you're wrong — False Dilemma (20/100)
At 3:32
Two options: accept their invented slur meaning or be labeled ignorant. Real world has dictionaries.
Why this score: They collapse the entire debate into 'my fake definition vs. your stupidity.' No middle ground, no actual definitions allowed — pure false dilemma forcing the viewer to pick their absurdity or look bigoted.
Original quote: “no cancer means that trans people should kill themselves”
Candidate promises to kill every bigot on Earth — False Dilemma (20/100)
At 4:47
Presents genocide as the only solution — zero room for "don't murder people" as an option 💀
Why this score: Sets up the premise that the only way to protect minorities is mass murder, then skips every non-lethal alternative. That's not a platform, mortal — that's a body count wearing policy's coat.
Original quote: “we must stop the bigots killing minorities before too late with my plan we can kill all the bigots in the world”
Candidate promises to 'kill all bigots' — false dilemma dressed as heroism — False Dilemma (20/100)
At 4:47
Presents genocide as the only way to stop bigotry — omits every other solution humanity has tried.
Why this score: Two options implied: let bigots exist or exterminate them. No middle ground, no laws, no culture shift, no courts — just mass killing as the heroic plan. Classic false dilemma used to make extremism sound reasonable.
Original quote: “we must stop the bigots killing minorities before too late with my plan we can kill all the bigots in the world”
Defines bigotry as exclusively male and woman-hating — Straw Man (20/100)
At 4:54
Redefines bigotry so only men qualify — erases every other documented form of prejudice 🔥
Why this score: By shrinking the definition to fit a punchline, the bit erases every non-male bigot in recorded history. Cute trick, terrible history.
Original quote: “a bigot is a killer of minorities because they hate women but how do you know if someone a bigot first only men can be bigot”
Claims bigotry is proven by saying 'cancer' or watching Channel 4 — False Equivalence (20/100)
At 5:03
Equates swearing and TV choice with actual hate crimes — the logic is doing somersaults 😈
Why this score: Channel 4 and the c-word are now on the same moral shelf as lynching. That's not analysis, that's a bit that ran out of runway.
Original quote: “they use words like cancer [__] and high and the last thing is they are known for watching channel 4”
Claims Tav's presidency would be unconstitutional — Confidence Mismatch (45/100)
At 5:32
States constitutional law like it's obvious — zero clause cited, zero amendment referenced 💀
Why this score: Throws around 'unconstitutional' without ever naming which part of the document is violated. Bold legal analysis for someone who just met the concept.
Original quote: “if Tav becomes president that would now that would be unconstitutional unless”
Robot berates human for not noticing it — Just Vibes (50/100)
At 5:43
Pure comedy beat — robot demanding attention like an angry toaster 😈
Why this score: No claim here, just escalating absurdity. The bit lands because it's ridiculous, not because it's trying to prove anything.
Original quote: “hey look at me now say something come on say something are you deaf hello is this a joke are you [__] [__] blind I'm a bloody blue robot from the future”
See the full analysis with timestamps →