how AI companies thought we’d react to this
Credibility score: 35/100 — Low Credibility. High BS alert! Many claims lack evidence or are misleading.
BSmeter analyzed "how AI companies thought we’d react to this" and rated it 35/100 for credibility (a BS score of 65/100 — low credibility), on 2026-07-26. Its weakest claim — "Claims "hundreds" of jobs — quietly adds "singular temporarily" to undermine it" — scored 25/100 and was flagged as loaded language. 4 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Claims analyzed
Dismisses job-loss link as 'unrelated' — missing context move — Missing Context (35/100)
Speaker actively steers away from the human cost angle they just raised, treating it as off-topic.
Drops 'bringing jobs' as the upside — plain sales pitch framing — Plain Sales Pitch (40/100)
Counterbalances the 'right behind your house' threat with an economic upside that has zero numbers attached.
Claims "hundreds" of jobs — quietly adds "singular temporarily" to undermine it — Loaded Language (25/100)
Promises big numbers then undercuts them with three killer words in one breath
"Many have" said no — then pivots to the value you'd lose by joining them — Missing Context (40/100)
Acknowledges resistance exists, then immediately reframes opting out as missing out on value
See the full analysis with sources and timestamps →