Credibility score: 38/100 — Low Credibility. High BS alert! Many claims lack evidence or are misleading.
BSmeter analyzed "It happened again. Nobody is safe anymore." and rated it 38/100 for credibility (a BS score of 62/100 — low credibility), on 2026-06-13. Its weakest claim — "Compares unnamed people to Hitler and calls 'Bruce Klein's preschool' deranged" — scored 5/100 and was flagged as bs. 30 claims were checked against the video transcript. Scores are produced by BSmeter's AI analysis of the transcript, not independent human verification.
Of 30 claims analyzed: 12 scored under 40, 18 between 40 and 69, and 0 at 70 or above.
At 0:30
Burnley/Brierfield is in Lancashire, UK — the suspect could easily be British-born.
Why this score: Location confirmed as Burnley, Lancashire. The video gives no evidence the arrested man is foreign-born or non-British; the claim is pure assumption.
Original quote: “Yeah. Where are they from? Not from Britain, I'll tell you that. Certainly not from Britain.”
At 2:30
Anatomy isn't that simple — plenty of neck stabbings aren't instantly fatal
Why this score: Overstated certainty. Key issues: - Neck has multiple non-lethal zones even with deep penetration - Survival depends on exact location, angle, and medical response time - Real-world case data shows many neck stabbings result in survival
Original quote: “if you actually take a knife like more than a two two-in blade knife and you stab it through a person's throat, you will kill them. They're dead. They're dead. That's it. It's over.”
At 2:45
Running after neck trauma doesn't prove it was only a slash — adrenaline works fast
Why this score: Logic gap. Key issues: - People have run with serious neck wounds before help arrives - Doesn't rule out stabbing followed by immediate flight - Community comments note police initially doubted the wound description
Original quote: “Watch the video. She was stabbed twice. ... Yeah, it slashed because she ran away. Yeah. Yeah, because if she didn't run away.”
At 3:10
Arrest part tracks with reports — condition updates often flip early on
Why this score: Mixed accuracy. Key issues: - Arrest of a migrant suspect matches multiple news wires - Early injury reports frequently contradict before official updates - No evidence presented for the specific conflicting posts cited
Original quote: “They said it's not life-threatening. In different posts, it says she's in critical condition. ... the migrant that stabbed her has now been arrested. Wow. What a surprise.”
At 3:30
Charlie Kirk is alive — this is just straight-up false
Why this score: Clear fabrication. Key issues: - No record of Charlie Kirk being stabbed or killed - As of June 2026 he remains active publicly - Reference appears to be a confused or invented parallel
Original quote: “if you really got stabbed in the neck, you would not be able to run away. You would just fall down and die just like Charlie Kirk did, right?”
At 4:30
Says it happened literally an hour ago — no source, no name, no location given.
Why this score: No verifiable details provided. - Speaker references a recent stabbing but offers zero specifics - No police report, victim name, or location mentioned - Community comments reference similar unverified incidents but add no new evidence
Original quote: “17 has been stabbed in the neck. Holy [__] [__] man.”
At 6:30
Calling an entire group of people 'psychos who can't stop themselves' is textbook dehumanization, not analysis.
Why this score: Broad generalization with zero data. Key issues: - No evidence that 'migrants' as a category commit these acts at higher rates - 'They're psychos' is a moral judgment, not a factual claim - Ignores that most violent crime is committed by citizens in every Western country
Original quote: “many of these migrants and these crazy people that are around in these countries, it's only a matter of time that this is going to get a lot worse. It is. It's going to get a lot [__] worse because they're going to keep doing stabbings. They're going to keep doing beheadings. It's because they…”
At 6:38
Mentions a specific incident but gives no source or confirmation — treating it as fact without checking.
Why this score: Single incident presented as trend. Key issues: - No corroboration in the provided web context for this specific Lancaster attack - 'Could set off more riots' is speculation, not reporting - No details on suspect ethnicity or motive given in the clip
Original quote: “Girls 17 stabbed in the neck in Lancaster street attack. Yikes. The footage has gone a bit a tad viral on X. It's brutal. The poor girl. And yes, the suspect is someone who could set off more riots if the girl had died.”
At 6:50
Reddit being 'extremely right-wing' is a wild take that ignores every major subreddit's moderation history.
Why this score: Contradicts observable reality. Key issues: - Reddit's own transparency reports and leaked internal docs show consistent left-leaning moderation bias - Major political subs (r/politics, r/news) are overwhelmingly left-leaning per multiple studies - Claim relies on 'censored right-wing posts we can't see' — unfalsifiable by design
Original quote: “I don't think it matters if he died or not or if she died or not. I don't think it makes a difference. Yeah, Reddit's cracking. Well, Reddit, the thing is that again, Reddit is actually very right-wing. Reddit is extremely right-wing.”
At 8:30
Claims decade-long daily violence that media hid until Musk 'opened the pipe' — zero stats, pure narrative.
Why this score: No supporting data. - 10-year daily violence claim lacks any crime statistics or sources - 'Elon opened the pipe' is metaphorical, not evidence of media suppression - Community comments agree with the sentiment but cite no numbers either
Original quote: “this kind of violence seems to be happening every day now. Here's what's funny is that it's been happening every day for probably 10 years, if not longer than that. The reason why you're hearing about it now is because now the controls and the this is the reason why they're going after Elon Musk so…”
At 10:30
Pulled that 50% figure straight out of the comment section — zero source, zero data.
Why this score: No study or dataset supports the 50% claim. - Facebook has never published comment-level violence stats at that scale. - Internal moderation reports show far lower rates of direct threats. - Sounds like an exaggeration of visible toxic comments, not a measured stat.
Original quote: “Half of the Facebook comments on political posts are people talking about killing each other or how they deserve to be killed”
At 12:30
Knives aren't banned in the UK — possession with intent is illegal, not ownership itself
Why this score: No UK law bans knives outright. - Carrying a blade with intent is illegal, everyday kitchen knives are legal - The speaker treats 'banned' as total prohibition, which it isn't - This is the exact loophole the 'how did he have one' line rests on
Original quote: “Knives were banned in the UK, by the way. Well, then how did he have a knife if it was banned?”
At 14:30
Predicting the exact flavor of the third leader after this one is just tea-leaf reading.
Why this score: Speculative political forecast. - No data or polling cited for the escalation sequence - Assumes voters will skip moderate options entirely - History shows deportation demands can persist across multiple cycles
Original quote: “the people in Europe have the option to solve this problem with somebody moderate like Rupert Lo or with somebody else. And I guarantee you that probably I don't know if it's going to be the next person after him. It might be the next person after that. The next person after that isn't going to be…”
At 16:30
200k years of evolution vs 500 years of society — mixing biology with culture.
Why this score: Biological evolution and cultural change are different timescales. - Human biology has not shifted dramatically in 500 years (correct) - But institutions, norms, and behavior absolutely have (ignored) - Conflates genetic stability with unchanged violence rates
Original quote: “It it's not like we have this there's a big fallacy that I think a lot of people in the modern age have that we have advanced beyond our inclinations. The truth is that the human being has been evolved for let's say like 200,000 years. Okay. Do you really think that we've made that much progress…”
At 18:30
Framing every war crime as proof rules don't exist ignores that international law actually exists and gets enforced unevenly.
Why this score: Historical pattern exists but the leap to 'rules are meaningless' skips context. - US and Allies did commit civilian bombings in WWII and faced post-war legal consequences. - Modern targeting in Gaza and potential US/China scenarios involve different legal and strategic constraints. - 'Nobody left' hyperbole assumes total escalation with zero restraint from politics or nukes.
Original quote: “I think that that's not really true. I think that if you look at the fact that we bombed uh Japan and we just vaporized women and children, it's really not true. We bombed Dresden. We killed thousands of of innocent people. Like it's just it's not true. Like I mean it's it's just not like and we…”
At 20:30
Straightforward isolationist take — nothing to fact-check.
Why this score: Pure opinion with no factual claim to verify. Speaker explicitly frames it as personal preference about U.S. foreign involvement.
Original quote: “will always side with Israel over foreign terrorists like that every single time. Uh but you know what I really side with is America. I don't want to side with Israel. I don't want to side with the foreign terrorists. I don't want to be over there at all. That's my opinion.”
At 22:30
Mentions 'apparent footage' and photos but gives zero sources or dates.
Why this score: No specific video, date, or location named. Unverifiable without more details. - Speaker warns people not to watch without confirming the material exists - Community comments reference a UK stabbing case but transcript provides no link
Original quote: “There is apparent footage circulating of this and I urge you not to don't watch it. Don't watch it. Similey, there are photos of the alleged attacker. Don't look at the Don't You don't want to look out. Oh no. No. You can't see that. Oh my god. What is wrong with these people?”
At 24:30
Attributes a specific view to 'Hindu logic' without citing any text or tradition
Why this score: Vague attribution to an entire religious/philosophical system. - No scripture, school, or thinker named - Reduces complex traditions to a single cause list - Sounds plausible but unsupported here
Original quote: “According to Hindu logic, evil is mainly due to arrogance and anger and the upbringing of the person which kind of makes sense.”
At 26:30
Straight to eugenics territory — 'born wrong, lock 'em up like animals' with zero nuance.
Why this score: Pure opinion with no data offered. - No genetic studies or prevalence numbers cited - Conflates mental illness with inevitable danger - 'Dangerous animal' framing skips any due process discussion
Original quote: “I think they're born with it. I do. I think some people spawn in and they're just [__] They're [__] They're totally totally deranged. there's something wrong with them on a very deep profound level. And as soon as we acknowledge that, we can treat them the way that they should be treated, which is…”
At 28:30
Calls animal torture purely biological — skips every study linking it to abuse and environment.
Why this score: Strong opinion, weak framing. - Twin and adoption studies show *both* genetics and early environment matter - Multiple meta-analyses link childhood animal cruelty to prior abuse or neglect - No mainstream psychologist claims it's "just biological" with zero social input
Original quote: “most kids don't like cats on fire and torture them and kill them. But some kids do that. That's not society. That that that's biological. There's something just profoundly wrong with those people, right?”
At 30:30
Calling street violence "pogroms" then jumping to mass deportation — that's a leap.
Why this score: Exaggerated language and policy leap. - Uses "pogroms" for recent UK events (actual term historically refers to organized anti-Jewish violence) - Connects unrest to deportation of entire groups - No data on who committed violence or deportation feasibility
Original quote: “we've seen the last week uh pogroms and ni Yeah, exactly. is openly whipping up people for migration like some scenes of the National Front, well then they should leave. That's what I think they should do. They should get the [__] out. They're not supposed to be in Britain.”
At 32:30
Calls her 12 in one line, then references the 'Skyrim girl' clip that community notes show as 17 — ages don't match.
Why this score: Age contradiction in the clip itself. - Speaker says '12-year-old girl in Scotland' at 34:01 - Immediately references the viral 'Skyrim girl' footage widely reported as 17 - Community comments repeatedly note the 17-year-old footage, creating direct mismatch with the stated age - No source given for the 'migrant attacker' detail in the provided transcript
Original quote: “a situation where a young girl in Dundee, the city that I'm speaking to you from, took out bladed weapons. Um, two weapons, a knife and a mini a small axe. he's talking about this girl right here. Uh, the Skyrim girl. Yes, the Skyrim girl. So, this is him discussing this topic just in case anybody…”
At 34:30
Says the migrant assault story was "proven in court later on" — but gives zero court records or case details to back it.
Why this score: Key claim lacks sourcing. - Speaker asserts the "defending sister" narrative was disproven in court - No case name, date, or official ruling referenced - Police statement mentioned later only addresses who approached whom, not sexual assault allegations
Original quote: “young person undoubtedly has a significant amount of trauma in her life. I can guarantee that without knowing fully her circumstances. But of course, Elon Musk, Tommy Robinson, and others, sympathizers of the far right, begin to spread misinformation that flies around the world like wildfire that…”
At 36:30
Describes widespread 2026 anti-migrant riots and mosque sieges — no matching current reports.
Why this score: Major event with zero mainstream coverage. - Web search for June 2026 returns no reports of Belfast or Glasgow riots matching this description - Claims of masked men preventing mosque attendance and house burnings over skin color lack any sourcing - Scale described would normally generate immediate news; silence suggests exaggeration or unverified rumor
Original quote: “It's hard to shake off the feeling of how sick I feel watching the scenes that we've witnessed over the last couple of days in Belfast, Glasgow, and up and down the country. In 2026, we're witnessing people's houses being burnt to the ground because of the color of their skin. Worshippers being…”
At 38:30
Names no specific person or case — just drops the accusation cold
Why this score: No named individual or incident given. - Without the actual case or person referenced, impossible to verify the timeline or actions described. - The phrasing treats it as established fact while providing zero sourcing.
Original quote: “This is the exact same person that was running defense for a guy that was sexually pursuing a 14 and a 12year-old girl. This was less than a year ago.”
At 40:30
Speaker admits the story was fake then still uses it to justify mass deportation — wild.
Why this score: Self-refuting. - Explicitly says "none of that was true" - Immediately pivots to using the debunked story anyway - Broad ethnic targeting based on a known falsehood
Original quote: “These young, this young girl was defending her sister from a man who wanted to sexually a migrant, sorry, who wanted to sexually assault her. And of course, that's why we needed all Pakistanis, Muslims, uh, and people of color out of this country, uh, was then, uh, what was followed on. Of course,…”
At 42:30
Cleese never said beheading is legal — speaker invented the specific legal claim to mock him.
Why this score: No evidence Cleese claimed beheading is legal. - Speaker attributes a precise legal position to Cleese without quote or clip - Cleese has criticized certain Islamist practices but never asserted beheading was lawful - This appears to be rhetorical exaggeration rather than reported fact
Original quote: “Medi Hassan. Oh god. Oh no. What about a ban on beheading? John Cle, once a comedic hero of mine, is so redpilled, so lost in online conspiracies of hate, so Islamophobic and obsessed with attacking Muslims on the left that he thinks that beheading is legal.”
At 44:30
Wild blanket accusation — 'always' and 'every single time' with zero evidence offered.
Why this score: Absolute language with no receipts. - The speaker offers no specific examples of the named countries' policies or individuals actively enabling terrorism - Community comments reflect strong agreement with the sentiment but provide no new evidence - The claim collapses under the word 'always' — even critics of certain immigration or foreign policies don't uniformly 'enable terrorism' - Classic escalation from policy disagreement to moral accusation
Original quote: “These people will always fall off on the side of supporting and enabling Muslim terrorism. They will do it every single time... whether it is in Iran, if it is in Qatar, if it's in uh the UK, if it's in Germany, if it's in the United States.”
At 46:30
Cites a 'French orientalist scholar' with zero name, quote, or source. Classic drive-by authority.
Why this score: No verifiable source for the scholar or quote. - 'Men he' appears to be a garbled or invented name - No original text, book title, or page reference provided - Searches turn up zero matching orientalist scholars making this exact claim
Original quote: “The French orientalist scholar men he once wrote that the Quran is not far from considering unbelief, disbelief as an infirmity, as an illness, as a disease of the human mind.”
At 48:30
Compares people to Hitler and references mysterious 'Bruce Klein's preschool' with zero context or evidence.
Why this score: Godwin's law + unidentified target. - Hitler comparison deployed with no specific quotes or actions - 'Bruce Klein's preschool' mentioned but never explained or sourced - Multiple serious accusations without substantiation
Original quote: “By the way, like this is only the beginning. And uh why don't we find Bruce Klein's preschool? What is this? I don't even know what this is. This seems deranged. And uh you going to look at World Cup today? Support for the USA? Maybe. I don't know yet. And uh holy [ __ ] [ __ ] man. They talk like…”