| What gets checked | Any video or podcast you paste, any topic — health, finance, science, history, politics — including creators with 500 views | Statements by political figures, candidates, interest groups and the media, selected by editors and reader suggestions; overwhelmingly US politics |
| Video and audio as the input | Native: transcribes the video or podcast, then extracts claims from what was actually said, timestamped | A written column. Quotes are pulled from speeches, ads and interviews by a reporter — there's no paste-a-link tool |
| Turnaround | Minutes, on demand, whenever you want it — or live in the browser extension while you watch | Days. Reported, edited and published on the newsroom's schedule, plus a Sunday print column |
| Human reporting and right of reply | None. Automated cross-referencing against web sources — nobody calls the speaker, and the AI can be wrong | A reporter contacts the person who made the claim, works from raw data and original sources, and publishes under a named byline with corrections |
| Rating and reasoning | 0-100 credibility score per claim with the evidence linked, plus logical-fallacy flags | One to four Pinocchios, a Geppetto Checkmark for true claims, an Upside-Down Pinocchio for flip-flops, a Bottomless Pinocchio for falsehoods repeated 20+ times — each argued out in prose |
| Deepfake and AI-media signals | Flags deepfake and AI-generated media signals in the clip itself | Not what a written column does — manipulated media gets covered when it's newsworthy, not as an automated check |