| Check any video or podcast link on demand | Yes — paste any YouTube, TikTok, Instagram Reel, or podcast link and get claim-by-claim scores back in seconds | No — analysts editorially select which statements and viral claims warrant a verdict; you can't queue an arbitrary video for checking |
| Polish politics and local-source context | Generalist AI working from live web sources; no Polish political desk and no dedicated local expertise | Core strength — a decade of verified Polish politician statements, election-promise tracking, and Polish-language primary sourcing |
| Human analysts and fact-checking accreditation | No — fully automated AI analysis, not accredited by any fact-checking network | Yes — named human analysts, IFCN signatory since 2019 and EFCSN member, bound by a published methodology and transparency standards |
| Turnaround per claim | Seconds — transcription, claim extraction, and web cross-referencing run automatically, with the tradeoff that no human reviews the result | Days — human research, primary sourcing, and editorial review before a verdict publishes |
| Watch-along browser extension | Yes — Chrome/Firefox extension scores claims in sync as the video plays, and flags logical fallacies and deepfake/AI-media signals | No — verdicts appear as published articles and, via its TikTok and Meta partnerships, as labels applied on those platforms |
| Citable, permanent record of political claims | Per-analysis results with linked evidence, but not a curated public archive you'd cite in reporting | Yes — a searchable archive of politician-statement verdicts (true / false / partial truth / manipulation / unverifiable) going back to 2014 |