| Fact-check any video or podcast link on demand | Yes — paste any YouTube, TikTok, Instagram Reel or podcast URL and it transcribes, extracts claims, and scores each 0-100 with sources | No — Correctiv's team selects which claims to investigate based on reach and public relevance; there's no self-serve tool that analyzes an arbitrary video for you |
| Watch-along browser extension | Chrome and Firefox extension flags claims in sync while the video plays | No browser extension; fact-checks are published as articles on correctiv.org, with a WhatsApp channel and hotline for submitting and receiving them |
| Time from question to answer | Minutes — automated transcription and live web cross-referencing | Days, by design — submissions go to a human team that researches and publishes a reported article. Slower because a person is actually doing the work |
| Depth on a single manipulated image or clip | Automated deepfake and AI-media signals plus fallacy flags — a fast first-pass signal, not a forensic conclusion | Better. Trained journalists do manual OSINT verification — reverse image search, geolocation, source tracing — and reach a defensible conclusion on the items they take up |
| IFCN-accredited process, named authors, corrections policy | No accreditation. An AI pipeline with sources linked so you can check its work yourself | Better. Signatory of the IFCN Code of Principles, with bylined journalists, an editorial process, and published corrections |
| Original investigative reporting | None. BSmeter checks claims that already exist in a video; it does not report | Better — and it isn't close. Correctiv breaks stories: the 2023 Potsdam far-right meeting scoop that drew mass protests across Germany, the CumEx-Files, MH17. This is a category BSmeter doesn't compete in |