| Video and audio as a native input | Paste a YouTube/TikTok/Reel/podcast link — it transcribes and extracts claims automatically | Handles text, images, and PDFs. No native video or audio ingestion — you'd supply a transcript yourself or wire up a third-party tool or MCP server |
| Real-time flagging while you watch | Chrome/Firefox extension surfaces claims in sync as the video plays | Chat interface — no in-page overlay on the video you're watching |
| Standardized 0-100 score on every claim | Every extracted claim gets a consistent numeric score with linked sources, across a whole hour-long video, unprompted | Writes a well-reasoned assessment with inline citations, but not a standardized per-claim numeric score |
| Live web sourcing and citations | Cross-references each claim against live web sources and links the evidence | Even. Claude has web search with inline citations on all plans including free — and it can chase a thread further than a fixed pipeline does |
| Deepfake and AI-generated media signals | Flags manipulation signals in the media itself alongside the claim analysis | Reasons about content, not a media-forensics tool — it doesn't inspect a file for synthesis artifacts |
| Open-ended reasoning, follow-ups, everything else | Single-purpose. It checks video claims and stops there | Clearly better. Claude explains nuance, argues both sides, answers follow-ups, and does the other 95% of knowledge work |